Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And big surprise, the Trump administration will ignore the law and not release the files.

You do realize the Trump administration wrote and passed the law, right?

Administrations don’t write and pass laws, dear.

No, they just reluctantly sign them because their veto would have been overturned.

[Anonymous]

Is Obama on the Epstein list? What about Bush?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Obama on the Epstein list? What about Bush?

They weren't sleazy cheaters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeffrey Epstein was not just a successful financier, he was also a convicted sex offender. To me, the most troubling part is not that Trump and other rich people would pal around together, to me it’s that they would associate with a sex offender

Well prepare to be shocked. The art world in particular is full of pedophiles and drug traffickers using art as a cover. The rich and the famous and the artistes see sex /sexuality as fluid and some include underage or children in that spectrum. There’s even an old clip surfacing now of a roast of Reiner where Al Franken said he let men bang his son. It was said as a joke but who jokes like that? That roast was done in 2000 fyi . I’m not pointing fingers but the boring life of the middle class or UMC is way better than the morality of the rich which leans toward skeevy

[Anonymous]

Who was Epstein working for? That's as important as knowing which people he tried to compromise and leverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Obama on the Epstein list? What about Bush?

Honestly it just doesn’t seem like their crowd of people. Most of these people involved are the New York and Foreign super rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The last name Clinton has over 100 hits. Didn’t find anything when I searched for current presidents last name. Interesting

The coverup continues

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Obama on the Epstein list? What about Bush?

Mentioned in connection with news articles, not as johns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Who was Epstein working for? That's as important as knowing which people he tried to compromise and leverage.

Himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Who was Epstein working for? That's as important as knowing which people he tried to compromise and leverage.

He worked for the zionists. Everybody knows that already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who was Epstein working for? That's as important as knowing which people he tried to compromise and leverage.

He worked for the zionists. Everybody knows that already.

I'm surprised people are still even asking the question. It is as obvious now as it was many years ago that he was connected to Zionists both in the US and abroad.

[Anonymous]

It's not surprise that almost everything is redacted: assume Trump's name and lot of Republicans are all over those files. This just proves it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not surprise that almost everything is redacted: assume Trump's name and lot of Republicans are all over those files. This just proves it.

The Trump Administration continues to protect and cover up for pedophiles and sex traffickers.

This "release" is a non-release. For all intents and purposes they are in violation of the court order.

Bondi, Patel and others involved need to be impeached and prosecuted for this complete sham.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not surprise that almost everything is redacted: assume Trump's name and lot of Republicans are all over those files. This just proves it.

He is the files.

They are the Trump files featuring Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeffrey Epstein was not just a successful financier, he was also a convicted sex offender. To me, the most troubling part is not that Trump and other rich people would pal around together, to me it’s that they would associate with a sex offender

Well prepare to be shocked. The art world in particular is full of pedophiles and drug traffickers using art as a cover. The rich and the famous and the artistes see sex /sexuality as fluid and some include underage or children in that spectrum. There’s even an old clip surfacing now of a roast of Reiner where Al Franken said he let men bang his son. It was said as a joke but who jokes like that? That roast was done in 2000 fyi . I’m not pointing fingers but the boring life of the middle class or UMC is way better than the morality of the rich which leans toward skeevy

Do you have any citations for this utter BS?