Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t good. They’re in violation of the law passed by congress and the senate and signed by the president. They have had plenty of time to go through them and redact.

It only begs the question...what are they trying to hide.

[Anonymous]

Ever served on a Grand Jury? Tell us about the defense, please. Explain how you determine who is telling the truth.

So, if the Grand Jury decided not to prosecute, then how valid is the testimony that was presented?

No fan of Epstein, but we do have a right to defense.

And, I do believe if there were anything damning about Trump that Garland would have released it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today is the deadline. So what’s everyone’s wager on what the regime does today?
- blow off deadline and release nothing
- release a few files and claim that’s everything
- release lots of stuff with so many redactions its unreadable
- release everything in compliance with law and invade Venezuela to distract attention
- other?

Other.

What is the legal process/procedure or typical path/approach for missing such a deadline?

What agencies/office/role and people ate held accountable and in what way?

** Please answer as if the U.S. had a functioning Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today is the deadline. So what’s everyone’s wager on what the regime does today?
- blow off deadline and release nothing
- release a few files and claim that’s everything
- release lots of stuff with so many redactions its unreadable
- release everything in compliance with law and invade Venezuela to distract attention
- other?

Other.

What is the legal process/procedure or typical path/approach for missing such a deadline?

What agencies/office/role and people ate held accountable and in what way?

** Please answer as if the U.S. had a functioning Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branc.

I “think” Congress has a facility in which people who are in contempt of Congress can be held. But it may be a matter for DOJ - hence the reasoning for it being independent from the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today is the deadline. So what’s everyone’s wager on what the regime does today?
- blow off deadline and release nothing
- release a few files and claim that’s everything
- release lots of stuff with so many redactions its unreadable
- release everything in compliance with law and invade Venezuela to distract attention
- other?

Other.

What is the legal process/procedure or typical path/approach for missing such a deadline?

What agencies/office/role and people ate held accountable and in what way?

** Please answer as if the U.S. had a functioning Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branc.

I “think” Congress has a facility in which people who are in contempt of Congress can be held. But it may be a matter for DOJ - hence the reasoning for it being independent from the White House.

Congress is controlled by Republicans currently and not doing anything to ensure that the Trump administration adheres to laws. So....are they going to be held accountable for missing a Congressionally mandated deadline? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stick to facts, people. The above is clearly a fabrication. Smoke, lies and dissimulation do not belong in this important thread.

If it were all lies, Marla and Trump could easily sue this person.

Wouldn't the statute of limitations have run long ago?

When did the person say this?

Marla supposedly said this over 30 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Of course they aren't releasing the documents and are breaking the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ever served on a Grand Jury? Tell us about the defense, please. Explain how you determine who is telling the truth.

So, if the Grand Jury decided not to prosecute, then how valid is the testimony that was presented?

No fan of Epstein, but we do have a right to defense.

And, I do believe if there were anything damning about Trump that Garland would have released it.

The same Garland that got us a second round of PedOTUS?

Hahahaha

[Anonymous]

What is Trump trying to hide by not releasing the files today, the congressionally mandated deadline? It’s not like they didn’t know this date was coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ever served on a Grand Jury? Tell us about the defense, please. Explain how you determine who is telling the truth.

So, if the Grand Jury decided not to prosecute, then how valid is the testimony that was presented?

No fan of Epstein, but we do have a right to defense.

And, I do believe if there were anything damning about Trump that Garland would have released it.

It's not the Grand Jury that chose not to prosecute. It was Pam Bondi, as the AG in Florida who chose not to prosecute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lmao, im so shocked:

A New York Times columnist has appeared in newly surfaced photos from Epstein’s estate, just weeks after he bashed Democrats for releasing information related to the sex offender's crimes.

https://trib.al/aWa5noi

NYT columnist David Brooks wrote an op-ed a few weeks ago titled, "The Epstein Story? Count Me Out,” lamenting people are too focused on the Epstein scandal + saying "the QAnon mentality has taken over."

Today he appeared in 4 photos from the Epstein dump.

Nobody is shocked that a GOP journalist doesn't want this released.

It was journalistic malpractice for Brooks to not disclose his meeting with Epstein in 2011 after Epstein was a convicted child rapist. His dismissive comments about the whole Epstein case really tell a story. He should be fired for the NYT and PBS.

Agreed. But hoping MAGA and conservatives will a/ have a spine, b/ be transparent, c/ show remorse, or d/ do anything that isn't for their own benefit is futile.

This is the biggest group of liars, grifters, and cheats we've ever seen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Today is the deadline. So what’s everyone’s wager on what the regime does today?
- blow off deadline and release nothing
- release a few files and claim that’s everything
- release lots of stuff with so many redactions its unreadable
- release everything in compliance with law and invade Venezuela to distract attention
- other?

Other.

What is the legal process/procedure or typical path/approach for missing such a deadline?

What agencies/office/role and people ate held accountable and in what way?

** Please answer as if the U.S. had a functioning Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branc.

Contempt for the attorneys responsible, file bar actions and impeachment for the AG and President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t good. They’re in violation of the law passed by congress and the senate and signed by the president. They have had plenty of time to go through them and redact.

No worries. Blanche will just prosecute himself. He'll assign it to Halligan thus making sure he gets a not guilty verdict.