|
Doing college tours and we’re noticing that there are a lot more “attractive” kids on campus compared to when we were students in the late 80s and 90s
Have others noticed this? |
|
This is a weird observation.
But, I will say that the internet has changed things for a lot of young adults; it take a lot less time to buy cool clothes, learn how to do your hair, research a good product for acne, etc. Everyone is becoming more attractive. |
| It's not the grunge era any longer. Ivy students were almost oppressively attractive at Princeton in the early 80s. Harvard and Columbia students, not so much. |
| Yes, but they are much heavier, by far. |
| My Ivy picked good looking people to give the tours. |
| I was shocked to see how heavy the women were in a recent college magazine. |
| My alma mater's students are less attractive than when I was there in the early-mid aughts, but I think it's mostly because they dress so badly. The students were fairly preppy when I was in school, but now they seem to favor ill-fitting t-shirts. |
Same |
| Smart rich kids don't eat fast food. They're all into organic everything and tea and smoothies. Middle class kids don't have the same dietary sophistication. |
| From my observation Princeton, Penn, Brown have the most attractive students. Harvard has the least attractive ones. Maybe it is correlated with the fact that Haravrd students are the brainiest. |
let me guess...you didn't actually go to school with smart rich kids? |
| I think in the late 80s and 90s we dressed so very differently. We were, as a pp noted, often purposely in "grunge" clothes. I wore beat up stuff from the Army Navy store, and I wasn't a particular trend-follower - its just what we did back then. I do think kids today are much more fashion conscious and spend time trying to be pretty. |
| Yes, of course OP. Money can buy a lot of things that help with good looks |
|
Rich/upper-middle-class kids are generally better looking than lower-middle-class/poor kids. It's not fair, but the more fortunate kids benefit from better nutrition, more exercise, genetics, good parental modeling, better healthcare, better clothes, etc.
Many LMC/poor kids subsist mostly on microwaved dinners and junk food, and rely on video games for entertainment (as opposed to organized sports/activities). |
| I think OP is just having a Roy Moore problem leering at teenage girls. |