Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I have a feeling that the Dems on the oversight committee are waiting to see what Bondi and Patel release and if it's primarily redacted pages then they will release files with extreme prejudice to trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Truth... there are far more pictures of Trump with Epstein and teenaged girls than there are of him with his own children.

He continues to refer to Barron as Melania's son. I'm sure Barron is Trump's son so why doesn't he say our son? Just seems weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See 16 new photos:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/12/politics/epstein-photos-trump-clinton-bannon

🤮
gross. how many of those girls in that pic with trump are underaged

None were, the faces were blocked by the Dems so that people would assume they were children. The unredacted photo is online, they were all adults.

Wow, you really are in denial.

NP. What, exactly, did the PP say that is untrue that would mean s/he's in denial?

Follow along. Those pictures have been in the public for years. Those were not underaged girls and it made no sense that their faces were covered unless they were trying to imply the girls were underage.

If you read the posts here, it obviously worked with some of you.

The names and faces of all the victims are redacted. Some of the trafficking victims were underaged and some were not.

Then, why did the Dems redact the faces of adult women who were not victims and had nothing to do with Epstein? Was it not to mislead people into thinking these women were victims and underage?
FWIW, this was a public picture of Hawaiian Tropic Models at Mar-a-Lago.
There was a reporter on MsNow who assumed they were underage because the Dems redacted their faces.

If you are somehow offering this as proof, maga is cooked. We have no idea how the redactions were done. Maybe they are concerned for their safety? MAGA nutcases love nothing more than terrorizing women. Maybe they are being sensitive to the fact that people don’t like having their picture taken with people of ill repute because it makes them seems guilty, too.

Haven’t you ever seen a documentary about serial killers?

[Anonymous]

Maybe because that is her only kid. He has several other kids. Or his dementia started when tall boy kid was born and orange can't remember details

[Anonymous]

The pictures that are leaking out are horrific.

That is all.

[Anonymous]

Trump is loving the distraction offered by the recent mass shootings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is loving the distraction offered by the recent mass shootings.

Absolutely, good time to do some false flags.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See 16 new photos:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/12/politics/epstein-photos-trump-clinton-bannon

🤮
gross. how many of those girls in that pic with trump are underaged

None were, the faces were blocked by the Dems so that people would assume they were children. The unredacted photo is online, they were all adults.

Wow, you really are in denial.

NP. What, exactly, did the PP say that is untrue that would mean s/he's in denial?

Follow along. Those pictures have been in the public for years. Those were not underaged girls and it made no sense that their faces were covered unless they were trying to imply the girls were underage.

If you read the posts here, it obviously worked with some of you.

Victims faces are blocked because they are victims of crime. Why are you fixating on age?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The pictures that are leaking out are horrific.

That is all.

The one of Epstein in the bathtub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is loving the distraction offered by the recent mass shootings.

Sorry MAGA, but we aren't low-IQ people with dementia or other memory issues. We aren't forgetting about the Epstein files no matter how much other crap you try to spam the public with to try and distract us.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe because that is her only kid. He has several other kids. Or his dementia started when tall boy kid was born and orange can't remember details

I believe that he did not want another child
After all, he wanted Marla to abort Tiffany.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

HA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is on record as saying Epstein was a creep, and not allowed as his properties, before it all came out. I’m no Trump fan, but he was not his friend.

Google and and you see many photos of Epstein , trump and Melania.

What's your point? So there's photos of Epstein, Trump, and Melania. There's also photos of Clinton and Epstein. That doesn't mean anything. Sorry, Dems but there's nothing here on Trump. If there was, Biden would have released them during his term.

[Anonymous]

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/16/us/politics/susie-wiles-takeaways-trump.html

Trump keeps claiming that Bill Clinton visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island. But Wiles says he is “wrong about that.”
Ms. Wiles acknowledged that Mr. Trump had not been telling the truth about former President Bill Clinton’s relationship with the sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, and faulted Attorney General Pam Bondi for her handling of the investigative files about him.

While Mr. Trump for years has repeatedly claimed that Mr. Clinton visited Mr. Epstein’s private island, Ms. Wiles said “there is no evidence” of that. Asked if there was any incriminating information about Mr. Clinton in the Epstein files, she said, “The president was wrong about that.”

As for Ms. Bondi, a friend of Ms. Wiles’s, she said the attorney general did not recognize the fervor of the president’s right-wing supporters about Mr. Epstein. “I think she completely whiffed on appreciating that that was the very targeted group that cared about this. First, she gave them binders full of nothingness. And then she said that the witness list, or the client list, was on her desk. There is no client list, and it sure as hell wasn’t on her desk.”