You can download here, and filter/sort by Tier.
http://www.dcpcsb.org/schoolquality |
WTF Bridges?
Congrats to ITS for climbing up to Tier 1. LAMB's numbers are astounding. |
(They are still loading in the reports. It looks like they are up to M or so) |
Glad to see Cap City rising from Tier 2 to Tier 1. |
Middle is still Tier 2. Lower and high school are Tier 1. |
Creative Minds is still tier 2? |
DCB crushed it. |
Lee is Tier 2. I think this is their first time being tiered?
SSMA is as well. Went from 60% to 44%? |
You need 2 years of testing data to get a Tier -- although there was a partial report for Lee last year that left the "tier" and growth piece off. Lee 2016 report http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/Lee%20Montessori%20PCS_EC_PK-2_2016.pdf |
Woohoo E.L. Haynes! |
Looks like Bridges was hurt by their ELA PARCC scores (including a lack of growth on them year over year) and reenrollment. Sad news. |
CMI is on high side of tier 2. If their tier score increases the same amount this year as last, they'll make tier 1 next year. 2 years at the latest before they make tier 1, IMO. They're on a similar trajectory as ITS. |
Yep. I dont have a kid there but it almost seems fishy to me. |
Very proud of this school. The administration's hard work is truly showing. |
It's not fishy -- it's the methodology (last year they got a 75, this year an 81). Median growth percentile counts for a LOT in this measure. More than just 'proficiency.' So a school where students are improving on PARCC year to year, even if they are not yet at 60-70% proficiency, will be rewarded in the ratings. The reports will show the relative weightings of the different factors. http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2016-10-11%20PMF%20Score%20Card%20SY15-16_DC%20Bilingual%20PCS_EC_PK3-8_2016.pdf (Note - the formula does also control for students who are already proficient having less 'room' to improve - but I'm not sure how). |