So almost a month after I get an email saying they can’t release my child’s player card unless I pay the winter fees because it’s part of the 2020 portion of the season? I feel like I’m being conned here and I’m unsure how to go about it. One poster suggested reach out to VYSA but it’s been almost 10 days and no word back. Has anyone been in this situation before? With Loudoun or another club? Any suggestions are highly welcomed. TIA! |
Pretty standard policy at the VYSA level. https://www.vysa.com/Default.aspx?tabid=2519941 Also, pretty clear what Loudoun’s policy is. You should read more carefully. https://bsbproduction.s3.amazonaws.com/portals/28638/docs/travel/2020-21-ls%20financial%20policy%20x.pdf If you can get the new club to pay all or a portion to what you agreed to pay Loudoun, then Loudoun will release you. They don’t care if your kid leaves they just want your payment which you agreed to. All the clubs require the same thing. Now, if you switch to a team that plays US Club vs VYSA, then no issue as the card system is totally separate. |
This is standard practice. Clubs need some level of roster certainty and don't allow midseason transfers, much like in the NCAA. VYSA will not help you here. |
There are 3 seasons in a year. Fall winter spring You only paid and participated in fall. You’re being robbed by Loudoun. Not sure why you’re surprised? The folks defending the criminal activity are simpletons with vested interests or staffers. Nothing justifies stealing and lying. Let alone in youth sports. |
It is not stealing. It is written policy. Read it first before signing and paying. You may not like it, but it is standard practice amongst most clubs. Loudoun is no better or worse. If you want to complain, then complain about VYSA, US Soccer, and US Club Soccer. It is their policies that allow this to happen. FCV is the same too (yes, we know who you’re affiliated with PP). And no, I don’t work for Loudoun. I’ve just had kids play at many clubs (FCV, Loudoun, as well as others) and they are all the same. |
| It’s interesting that with all this BS the kids get screwed. I’d reach out to the Loudon Soccer Board of Directors as well as VYSA. Setting up a system were people have to effectively pay to get their card is concerning. |
Yes I agree that this appears to give the club an unfair degree of leverage in negotiations with a dissatisfied customer. |
| I recommend skipping travel soccer altogether in the future if the money lost is this big of a deal. Travel soccer is not cheap. Not worth this amount of stress is it? And don't go down the equestrian, gymnastics or volleyball route, they are more expensive. Try softball or swimming. |
| Loudoun Soccer is a nicely run organization. But do the players really get anything out of the virtual training sessions? |
It’s called a duopoly and it’s what VYSA and US Club soccer have in Virginia. They collude with the clubs to set these policies. Like the other poster said, it is what it is and if you don’t like it then don’t play travel. |
| i don't understand the confusion here. the family signed a one season agreement with a club to play travel soccer. a soccer season starts late summer/fall and ends late spring. whoever said soccer consists of separate fall, winter, and travel seasons has zero idea how travel soccer works, or is most likely a troll with a vested interest in fcv or var. can tom brady walk away from tampa bay midseason because he feels like it? can trevor lawrence transfer to notre dame next week because they have a better political science program? can you terminate your fios bill whenver you want? of course not, that is literally why contracts exist. |
What's var? |
I don't think there's any confusion. It's just that the customer is not happy with the product they have received which they believe is not what they were sold. Under such circumstances it is entirely reasonable to withhold further payment and investigate a different supplier. And with any other product this is what would happen. If the club felt that they had delivered as promised then they could go to court to seek to enforce their contract - because that's the mechanism we have for enforcing contracts in our society. The player card mechanism which prevents the customer from purchasing a product from a competitor appears to me to violate anti-trust law - although I'm not a lawyer. |
The club is not seeking injunctive relief but rather the parent. So the onus would be on the parent as plaintiff to file in court. |
Well yes. But it's only that way around because of the player card issue. Without the player card the club would have to go to court and seek relief from the paernt and prove that the money is owed. But the player card turns that on its head because it acts as a mechanism to prevent the player from purchasing from any other club - which definitely looks like illegal collusion between clubs to me. |