2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

This is an insane list

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are Capital Oranges results for 25s and 26s also unusually good and not to be expected for 27 and beyond?

See you go by the past to make a prediction and from past success you can extrapolate that the 27 and 28 class will be more along the line with that of the 23 and 24 class. The 23 and 24 class also sent 4-9 girls to Top 25 schools.......

The 23 and 24 classes were top ~10 teams (12 and 8). The OP was asking about teams in club in the past who are at or close to 25, where Capital's teams are now. So you'd have to extrapolate for other clubs that were down there in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are Capital Oranges results for 25s and 26s also unusually good and not to be expected for 27 and beyond?

See you go by the past to make a prediction and from past success you can extrapolate that the 27 and 28 class will be more along the line with that of the 23 and 24 class. The 23 and 24 class also sent 4-9 girls to Top 25 schools.......

The 23 and 24 classes were top ~10 teams (12 and 8). The OP was asking about teams in club in the past who are at or close to 25, where Capital's teams are now. So you'd have to extrapolate for other clubs that were down there in the past.

The OP asked, "what percentage of recruited girls play on a top 25 team?"—not about teams ranked around 25. Just clarifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are Capital Oranges results for 25s and 26s also unusually good and not to be expected for 27 and beyond?

See you go by the past to make a prediction and from past success you can extrapolate that the 27 and 28 class will be more along the line with that of the 23 and 24 class. The 23 and 24 class also sent 4-9 girls to Top 25 schools.......

The 23 and 24 classes were top ~10 teams (12 and 8). The OP was asking about teams in club in the past who are at or close to 25, where Capital's teams are now. So you'd have to extrapolate for other clubs that were down there in the past.

The OP asked, "what percentage of recruited girls play on a top 25 team?"—not about teams ranked around 25. Just clarifying.

No, she didn't. It's just that most of her fellow Cap brethren can't read. She also came back on to clarify it for you, as having it explained was still difficult. Seems it still is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For people who know and/or have been through the process, what is the percentage of girls who get recruited who play on a top 25 team?

This the original post. No indication she is asking abut teams at or close to 25.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

You had a polar opposite understanding of what was asked originally, with an explanation, and then with a clarification from the actual OP. You still didn't get it. I am not at all surprised that your comprehension is still wanting. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for some of you to get by day to day.

Why don't you just stagger teams with results at various intervals up to 25 if you insist on stubbornly not just saying "my bad" as an Anonymous poster?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

You had a polar opposite understanding of what was asked originally, with an explanation, and then with a clarification from the actual OP. You still didn't get it. I am not at all surprised that your comprehension is still wanting. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for some of you to get by day to day.

Why don't you just stagger teams with results at various intervals up to 25 if you insist on stubbornly not just saying "my bad" as an Anonymous poster?

Give it up lady. You got clobbered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

You had a polar opposite understanding of what was asked originally, with an explanation, and then with a clarification from the actual OP. You still didn't get it. I am not at all surprised that your comprehension is still wanting. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for some of you to get by day to day.

Why don't you just stagger teams with results at various intervals up to 25 if you insist on stubbornly not just saying "my bad" as an Anonymous poster?

Give it up lady. You got clobbered.

Nice try? 1 or 4 people on here have zero understanding, maybe still, of what the OP was asking. Even with multiple explanations.
Pro tip - when someone asks what a "top 15" team does in recruiting typically? They're not asking about the #1 team's recruiting. They're asking about a team that might be in the neighborhood of 15, what does their recruiting look like.. Now do the same with "top 20" and "top 25".

This isn't some new type thing. When people discuss rankings (of their own team, other teams, teams they play, football, basketball, whatever), putting it in chunks of 5 and 10 is typical. A team that's ranked 19? "A top 20 team". A team that's 8? "A top 10 team". Same with top 5 and 25, 30 and on. That's understood universally everywhere unless you have a group of people who are dense as a box of rocks and are only now getting exposed to sports because they have a progeny involved. When you group a list of "who went to top 25 schools"? Then you get a tally. It's called reading comprehension

Somebody post the recruiting results of clubs in the last several years who were in the mid-20's so we can have an idea how the Capital teams might fare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

You had a polar opposite understanding of what was asked originally, with an explanation, and then with a clarification from the actual OP. You still didn't get it. I am not at all surprised that your comprehension is still wanting. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for some of you to get by day to day.

Why don't you just stagger teams with results at various intervals up to 25 if you insist on stubbornly not just saying "my bad" as an Anonymous poster?

Give it up lady. You got clobbered.

Nice try? 1 or 4 people on here have zero understanding, maybe still, of what the OP was asking. Even with multiple explanations.
Pro tip - when someone asks what a "top 15" team does in recruiting typically? They're not asking about the #1 team's recruiting. They're asking about a team that might be in the neighborhood of 15, what does their recruiting look like.. Now do the same with "top 20" and "top 25".

This isn't some new type thing. When people discuss rankings (of their own team, other teams, teams they play, football, basketball, whatever), putting it in chunks of 5 and 10 is typical. A team that's ranked 19? "A top 20 team". A team that's 8? "A top 10 team". Same with top 5 and 25, 30 and on. That's understood universally everywhere unless you have a group of people who are dense as a box of rocks and are only now getting exposed to sports because they have a progeny involved. When you group a list of "who went to top 25 schools"? Then you get a tally. It's called reading comprehension

Somebody post the recruiting results of clubs in the last several years who were in the mid-20's so we can have an idea how the Capital teams might fare.

I am the OP and this is spot on. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am the OP and I am a she and Cap B parent. Was just curious as to how many girls percentage wise get recruited by colleges who play on a top 25 club team. That’s all.

Here is the clarification. Still not seeing that she is asking about teams at or close to 25.

You had a polar opposite understanding of what was asked originally, with an explanation, and then with a clarification from the actual OP. You still didn't get it. I am not at all surprised that your comprehension is still wanting. I can't imagine how difficult it must be for some of you to get by day to day.

Why don't you just stagger teams with results at various intervals up to 25 if you insist on stubbornly not just saying "my bad" as an Anonymous poster?

Give it up lady. You got clobbered.

Nice try? 1 or 4 people on here have zero understanding, maybe still, of what the OP was asking. Even with multiple explanations.
Pro tip - when someone asks what a "top 15" team does in recruiting typically? They're not asking about the #1 team's recruiting. They're asking about a team that might be in the neighborhood of 15, what does their recruiting look like.. Now do the same with "top 20" and "top 25".

This isn't some new type thing. When people discuss rankings (of their own team, other teams, teams they play, football, basketball, whatever), putting it in chunks of 5 and 10 is typical. A team that's ranked 19? "A top 20 team". A team that's 8? "A top 10 team". Same with top 5 and 25, 30 and on. That's understood universally everywhere unless you have a group of people who are dense as a box of rocks and are only now getting exposed to sports because they have a progeny involved. When you group a list of "who went to top 25 schools"? Then you get a tally. It's called reading comprehension

Somebody post the recruiting results of clubs in the last several years who were in the mid-20's so we can have an idea how the Capital teams might fare.

Something tells me there are people intentionally missing the point because they will take any opportunity to post 2026 recruiting results, thereby reassuring themselves and others of Capital's supremacy. They have them stored in their Notes App, ready to copy paste whenever someone mentions anything even remotely related.

[Anonymous]

About 19.8 percent of girls play on top 25 teams based on 126 teams and 9 girls per year per team. About 20-68% percent of players on a top 25 club team will be recruited to a top 25 program. Some clubs have more players some have better players. If you isolate on Capital blue your odds are approximately 35-50% your player will wind up at a top 25. Numbers can be misleading though and if you massage them enough you can usually get the answer you want. For example picking a coaches poll vs strength of schedule ranking or using the final club poll vs a poll from a previous period of time. Also, to be fair in college the 18-25 range can vary significantly by year which can swing your results. Having said all that playing anywhere is a major accomplishment and should not be diminished.

[Anonymous]

Those are really good % at Capital Blue! Even looking back to Class of 2023 (thanks to whoever posted that info) the % playing on top 25 teams any given year knowing the rankings of D1 programs change is still amazing.

[Anonymous]

Capital 23-26 teams also sent players to major academic schools outside the top 25 rankings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Capital 23-26 teams also sent players to major academic schools outside the top 25 rankings.

This is a great point. ‘28s will be just fine. Look forward to the fall.