Why does an article about a MCPS teacher having his sex abuse conviction erased get deleted on this

[Anonymous]

forum?

News is not allowed?

[Anonymous]

I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

News is trolling? Articles are not to be copies, you get that, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

News is trolling? Articles are not to be copies, you get that, right?

Do you get that providing the context of a link can be provided without copying the article? Do you get that people don't like clicking blind links? Get offline Grandma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

News is trolling? Articles are not to be copies, you get that, right?

You get the rules of this forum, right?

[Anonymous]

So you wrote this then reposted the article in another thread with a title in ALL CAPS? Smooth move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

News is trolling? Articles are not to be copies, you get that, right?

Do you get that providing the context of a link can be provided without copying the article? Do you get that people don't like clicking blind links? Get offline Grandma.

A headline that says

JUDGE STRIKES SEX ABUSE CONVICTION OF FORMER MCPS TEACHER

is too hard to read for this forum?

What's with the name calling? You would rather not know news about a MCPS teacher because you hate the anonymous person that posted it? Are you a MCPS grad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a thread with a link that wasn't explained. Be more descriptive in your trolling.

News is trolling? Articles are not to be copies, you get that, right?

Do you get that providing the context of a link can be provided without copying the article? Do you get that people don't like clicking blind links? Get offline Grandma.

I looked at the link. The teacher was caught in a sting with the victim. He was going to have sex with a 16 year old student. He may get his record erased, including being removed from the registry.

[Anonymous]

I'm guessing that the OP is outraged about this, but it would be helpful to know specifically what the OP is outraged about, and whom the OP is outraged at.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing that the OP is outraged about this, but it would be helpful to know specifically what the OP is outraged about, and whom the OP is outraged at.

There is a link farther down.

Not the OP but I am guessing it is this story.

http://www.thesentinel.com/mont/news/local/item/5776-judge-strikes-sex-abuse-conviction-of-former-mcps-teacher

[Anonymous]

If OP posted a link with no other text, it will get deleted, according to the site's rules.

[Anonymous]

Even the internet has rules, OP. On DCUM, posts consisting of just a link are deleted because to avoid spam, regardless of content.

If you had bothered to read the rules before posting, you wouldn't be incensed at your own stupidity right now.

You can repost the link with a simple explanatory sentence. Please don't shout in all caps, though, because it makes you look crazy.