Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bloomberg reporter Jason Leopold obtained an email dump proving that Trump paid over $800,000, for 1,000 FBI agents to remove his name from the Epstein files.

They had Power Point instructions on how to remove every trace of Donald Trump’s name and prepare the evidence for release.

Doesn't sound right. I can't imagine 1,000 individuals and nobody talked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, our tax dollars being put to good use.

This is beyond the pale! So trump paid from his own pocket, $800,000 for FBI agents to spend a week redacting his name from Epstein files! My mind is truly boggled!

Would this be in compliance with the law that was just approved? I think not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the info is still not being released? Was the idea to pass legislation and then just ignore it?

There does seem to be some issues possibly national security or otherwise. It appears that caught substantial amounts of the legislative/governmental information in their investigation.

EG Larry Summers doing Democrat planning, Epstein giving instructions to legislators. So, it may not be as simple as DOJ core dump. Like they didn't just have information about visits to the Island. I'm waiting to see what does come out before forming an opinion here.

But how could they justify, within the letter of the new law, going in and selectively removing all mentions of DJT?

[Anonymous]

Why isn't his name being redacted a bigger scandal?

If he's innocent of any wrong doing, why would his name even need to be redacted when it's common knowledge that they were friends?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the info is still not being released? Was the idea to pass legislation and then just ignore it?

There does seem to be some issues possibly national security or otherwise. It appears that caught substantial amounts of the legislative/governmental information in their investigation.

EG Larry Summers doing Democrat planning, Epstein giving instructions to legislators. So, it may not be as simple as DOJ core dump. Like they didn't just have information about visits to the Island. I'm waiting to see what does come out before forming an opinion here.

AKA, we have to protect the entrenched corruption from daylight.

Unfortunately, that may be the case. I hope they get as much of it out as is possible without totally screwing the country over or running over political norms like eaves dropping on political rivals and what not.

The people want to burn it all down, so Dems should do it. They were too scared to call out Trump in November for rigging the election and now we have a sh-t economy, poisoned water and air, a gestapo roughing up American teenagers, and open-air corruption. I'm not sure at this point, it will be much worse.

I don't want to hear it from the Democrats about Trump these days. Did you see the video about Larry Summers project 2029, was that what you wanted?

That’s the issue?

I mean, if Summers had something to do with Epstein he can go down with Trump and the rest, but the version of 2029 (it’s not the only Project 2029 plan) is the beginnings of a new start for America, a sane one.

Governance & Democracy
• Limit corporate influence in politics — curb the power of big money and corporations in elections and policymaking. 
• Provide universal access to democracy & make every vote count — reforms to ensure fair representation and reduce barriers to voting. 
• End wars of conquest and occupation — a foreign-policy stance favoring peace and reducing interventionist wars. 
• Indigenous governance over their own communities — policies recognizing and strengthening indigenous sovereignty. 

Economy & Social Welfare
• Progressive tax on extreme wealth — increase taxes on the wealthy to reduce inequality and fund public investment. 
• Ensure fair pay for all workers & strengthen unions / labor protections — explicitly support labor rights, collective bargaining, and worker protections. 
• Treat healthcare as a human right — expand access to healthcare (likely via public options or broader coverage). 
• Make higher education accessible — proposals to lower cost or expand access to higher education. 
• Fix the housing crisis — policies to expand affordable housing, address cost burdens, tackle housing inequity. 
• Support families and children — social policies aimed at improving support systems for families (could include childcare, social services, etc.). 
• Create a pathway to citizenship — immigration reform to allow immigrants a path to legal status / citizenship under more humane terms. 
• Address long-term injustice and inequities — initiatives to deal with historical injustices and systemic discrimination. 

Justice, Legal/Institutional Reform & Civil Rights
• No one is above the law / fairness in justice system — accountability, rule of law, judicial fairness. 
• End lifetime power in the judiciary — proposals such as term limits or reforms to judicial lifetime tenure. 
• Restore competition and fairness — antitrust measures, challenge monopolies, curb corporate abuses. 
• Shift to harm-reduction, rehabilitation; abolish private prisons; overhaul sentencing — criminal justice reforms aiming for rehabilitation over punitive incarceration. 
• Prevent “surveillance capitalism” — protect privacy and limit corporate or governmental data/ surveillance overreach. 

Broader Social & Environmental Vision
• Embrace diversity — strengthen protections and inclusion for marginalized communities, support civil rights. 
• Safeguard reproductive freedom — ensure reproductive rights, likely including access to abortion and reproductive healthcare. 
• Take bold action on climate / reverse global warming — environmental reforms, investment in sustainability, green energy, climate justice. 
• Promote sustainable international development and global justice — foreign policy and global engagement aiming for fairness, not exploitation. 

Where's the one about ending lifetime foreign aid to beggar nations that refuse to end apartheid?

Also, no requirement that all foreign agents and their proxies need to register under FARA?

So not much is different in foreign policy then. Won't sit well with the progressive wing.

Most of the other policies are pie in the sky ideas that may sound great to some but won't get passed or will involve the courts. In fact most seem similar to the old platform.

Expect to get wrecked by a 3rd party populist candidate if the DNC plays games again during primary season. Dems already approved of this approach to their voters by bailing from their duly elected mayoral candidate in NYC. So now that's meddling in the past 2 presidential elections and the most important city in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bloomberg reporter Jason Leopold obtained an email dump proving that Trump paid over $800,000, for 1,000 FBI agents to remove his name from the Epstein files.

They had Power Point instructions on how to remove every trace of Donald Trump’s name and prepare the evidence for release.

Doesn't sound right. I can't imagine 1,000 individuals and nobody talked.

Well now we know. And anyone who ISN'T talking is complicit in the biggest government coverup in decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bloomberg reporter Jason Leopold obtained an email dump proving that Trump paid over $800,000, for 1,000 FBI agents to remove his name from the Epstein files.

They had Power Point instructions on how to remove every trace of Donald Trump’s name and prepare the evidence for release.

Doesn't sound right. I can't imagine 1,000 individuals and nobody talked.

Well now we know. And anyone who ISN'T talking is complicit in the biggest government coverup in decades.

https://newrepublic.com/post/203762/trump-fbi-redacted-epstein-files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, our tax dollars being put to good use.

This is beyond the pale! So trump paid from his own pocket, $800,000 for FBI agents to spend a week redacting his name from Epstein files! My mind is truly boggled!

Trump paying $800,000 for a “special redaction” report. The President of the US can’t face himself with any degree of honesty… talk about a SNOWFLAKE!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't his name being redacted a bigger scandal?

If he's innocent of any wrong doing, why would his name even need to be redacted when it's common knowledge that they were friends?

Only evidence I have seen was of Epstein and the Democrats working together to try to smear Trump.

Really? If so, again there would be no reason to redact Trump's name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't his name being redacted a bigger scandal?

If he's innocent of any wrong doing, why would his name even need to be redacted when it's common knowledge that they were friends?

Only evidence I have seen was of Epstein and the Democrats working together to try to smear Trump.

Really? If so, again there would be no reason to redact Trump's name.

It'll all get out there soon enough, but once you realize how much Epstein was communicating with DC in particular Democrats, it'll make sense that a large portion of these emails are irrelevant to the scandal and Trump's name in them don't really mean much. 1000's of times people emailed back and forth about Trump in 2016 so what.

[Anonymous]

Still waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't his name being redacted a bigger scandal?

If he's innocent of any wrong doing, why would his name even need to be redacted when it's common knowledge that they were friends?

Only evidence I have seen was of Epstein and the Democrats working together to try to smear Trump.

Really? If so, again there would be no reason to redact Trump's name.

And so much so that Trump paid 1000 FBI agents nearly $1m in overtime to get his name and his interests redacted.

Must be pretty damning stuff.

[Anonymous]

I am praying that someone will leak the photos of Trump and underage girls. This would be eca lovely Christmas gift to MAGAS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't his name being redacted a bigger scandal?

If he's innocent of any wrong doing, why would his name even need to be redacted when it's common knowledge that they were friends?

Only evidence I have seen was of Epstein and the Democrats working together to try to smear Trump.

Really? If so, again there would be no reason to redact Trump's name.

And so much so that Trump paid 1000 FBI agents nearly $1m in overtime to get his name and his interests redacted.

Must be pretty damning stuff.

Anyone still pushing the narrative that he is innocent is a bot or a Russian mark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am praying that someone will leak the photos of Trump and underage girls. This would be eca lovely Christmas gift to MAGAS.

Not photos, but the Epstein estate just released another load of files to the committee and Patel is whining that the FBI didn’t get it first.