Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Alabama journalists say that rumors about Moore's pedophilia circulated for years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

No. Humans are flawed, party aside. Plenty of democratic scumbags. Democrats, imo, don't compound their sins for the most part by also being hypocrites. They dont usually run on a platform of "family values" and "moral clarity" or whatever.

What is astonishing here (and with the Trump gross tapes) is that people are defending him, slandering the victim etc. I would have thought that you would rather be represented by a democrat than a pedophile but it's not the way the good people of Alabama seem to think.

We are defending the right to due process and speaking out against the press using their power to turn accusations into fact without due process.

Hey all, there is no point discussing this anymore. Seems like conservatives everywhere (DCUMer here, not just Alabama) will give their men a free pass to sexual assaults as long as there is no picture or tape to prove the act. No wonder they have elected a morally scumbag for their leader. What's the point of this debate when Alabama is going to elect Moore anyway. Conservatives admire the middle east kind of strong men moral values, as long as it is one of them does it. No woman should be believed when then they accuse a conservative leader, that is the message.

Lets move on.

Your candidate and your donors were as shady as an ancient oak in the heat of July for DECADES.

[Anonymous]

This is so gross. I honestly thought the GOP would draw the line at pedophilia. Naive of me I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

So 30 people lied. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

No. Humans are flawed, party aside. Plenty of democratic scumbags. Democrats, imo, don't compound their sins for the most part by also being hypocrites. They dont usually run on a platform of "family values" and "moral clarity" or whatever.

What is astonishing here (and with the Trump gross tapes) is that people are defending him, slandering the victim etc. I would have thought that you would rather be represented by a democrat than a pedophile but it's not the way the good people of Alabama seem to think.

We are defending the right to due process and speaking out against the press using their power to turn accusations into fact without due process.

Uh huh, you keep telling yourself that, hun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

So 30 people lied. Got it.

The Dems were probably cultivating this for years and waiting for the right time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

So 30 people lied. Got it.

The Dems were probably cultivating this for years and waiting for the right time.

Ya, that's it. They lured a 14 year old girl to entrap an Assistant DA in 1979 in the hopes that one day, 38 years later, that Assistant DA would run for office and the Dems could spring it on the world.



(And back then, I would assume that Moore was a dem)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

No. Humans are flawed, party aside. Plenty of democratic scumbags. Democrats, imo, don't compound their sins for the most part by also being hypocrites. They dont usually run on a platform of "family values" and "moral clarity" or whatever.

What is astonishing here (and with the Trump gross tapes) is that people are defending him, slandering the victim etc. I would have thought that you would rather be represented by a democrat than a pedophile but it's not the way the good people of Alabama seem to think.

We are defending the right to due process and speaking out against the press using their power to turn accusations into fact without due process.

Hey all, there is no point discussing this anymore. Seems like conservatives everywhere (DCUMer here, not just Alabama) will give their men a free pass to sexual assaults as long as there is no picture or tape to prove the act. No wonder they have elected a morally scumbag for their leader. What's the point of this debate when Alabama is going to elect Moore anyway. Conservatives admire the middle east kind of strong men moral values, as long as it is one of them does it. No woman should be believed when then they accuse a conservative leader, that is the message.

Lets move on.

Your candidate and your donors were as shady as an ancient oak in the heat of July for DECADES.

Sexual abuse of a 14 year old girl. Try to stay focused. It’s not hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

So 30 people lied. Got it.

The Dems were probably cultivating this for years and waiting for the right time.

Thank god for our national tin foil reserves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

No. Humans are flawed, party aside. Plenty of democratic scumbags. Democrats, imo, don't compound their sins for the most part by also being hypocrites. They dont usually run on a platform of "family values" and "moral clarity" or whatever.

What is astonishing here (and with the Trump gross tapes) is that people are defending him, slandering the victim etc. I would have thought that you would rather be represented by a democrat than a pedophile but it's not the way the good people of Alabama seem to think.

We are defending the right to due process and speaking out against the press using their power to turn accusations into fact without due process.

Hey all, there is no point discussing this anymore. Seems like conservatives everywhere (DCUMer here, not just Alabama) will give their men a free pass to sexual assaults as long as there is no picture or tape to prove the act. No wonder they have elected a morally scumbag for their leader. What's the point of this debate when Alabama is going to elect Moore anyway. Conservatives admire the middle east kind of strong men moral values, as long as it is one of them does it. No woman should be believed when then they accuse a conservative leader, that is the message.

Lets move on.

Your candidate and your donors were as shady as an ancient oak in the heat of July for DECADES.

Sexual abuse of a 14 year old girl. Try to stay focused. It’s not hard.

But I just can't stop thinking of Hill and Bill. I'm not blessed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

So 30 people lied. Got it.

The Dems were probably cultivating this for years and waiting for the right time.

You have got to be kidding. Then they are sicker than Moore using that logic.

[Anonymous]

deplorables are pedophilia lovers: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/11/10/daily-202-as-roy-moore-declines-to-step-aside-a-tale-of-two-republican-parties-emerges/5a04e1dd30fb045a2e002f77/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_daily202-8a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

[Anonymous]

Oh man, Luther Strange's oppo guy is going to really have to work to find his next gig.

[Anonymous]

And Moore advocated from the Bench on this

https://thinkprogress.org/this-is-what-roy-moore-has-said-about-child-abuse-and-sexual-assault-c844cf8ff480/

Moore was the only vote in favor of a day care worker who raped a 12-year-old, claiming there was no ‘implied threat of serious physical injury’.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And Moore advocated from the Bench on this

https://thinkprogress.org/this-is-what-roy-moore-has-said-about-child-abuse-and-sexual-assault-c844cf8ff480/

Moore was the only vote in favor of a day care worker who raped a 12-year-old, claiming there was no ‘implied threat of serious physical injury’.

Moore was clearly voting from personal experience.