IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where’s the crime?

Bribery, unlike Trump who was impeached

Who bribed who to what result?

Why was Joe put on speakerphone and/or in attendance over 20 times with his son's business dealings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someday is today.

Joe's conveniently on vaca.
Will the media move on from this over the coming week, or will they question Joe about the lies he has told once he returns from vacation?

My bet is they will move on with the exception of a few journalists who Joe will call "dog faced pony soldiers" if they ask about his lies.

Already moved on. NOTHING in today's WAPO print edition about Devon Archer testimony. But, a front page article today (and everyday) about Trump's court cases.

It’s almost like WAPO understands this is made up story.

Why was Joe put on speakerphone and/or in attendance over 20 times with his son's business dealings?

According tp Dan Goldman, it was because of Beau's death... victimhood not lost on Mr Levi Strauss heir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where’s the crime?

Bribery, unlike Trump who was impeached

Who bribed who to what result?

Is this the "there was no quid pro quo" defense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man to think we would know nothing if not for the laptop from hell.

There have been whispers long before the laptop, but complicit media has been running interference for a while.

Trump really exposed the media by piercing through their supposed neutrality. All media biases are nakedly plain now and too difficult to ignore. It's a horrible information ecosystem.

When the NY Times has to be hundreds of millions to settle a liable suit, come talk to me about ALL MEDIA BIASES...in the mean time, maybe examine the biases on the right, where suits related to lying seem to be successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someday is today.

Joe's conveniently on vaca.
Will the media move on from this over the coming week, or will they question Joe about the lies he has told once he returns from vacation?

My bet is they will move on with the exception of a few journalists who Joe will call "dog faced pony soldiers" if they ask about his lies.

Already moved on. NOTHING in today's WAPO print edition about Devon Archer testimony. But, a front page article today (and everyday) about Trump's court cases.

It’s almost like WAPO understands this is made up story.

Why was Joe put on speakerphone and/or in attendance over 20 times with his son's business dealings?

According tp Dan Goldman, it was because of Beau's death... victimhood not lost on Mr Levi Strauss heir.

A total Bull$hit answer. Having Joe on speakerphone during business meetings has nothing to do with Beau's death.
Not only does Joe pull the victim card when convenient. Seems it is a Democratic tactic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man to think we would know nothing if not for the laptop from hell.

Yes. If not for the laptop, the most corrupt family in history would have gotten away with everything. The amount of corruption is staggering, and nobody knew about it until a small computer was broken into.

[Anonymous]

The GOP’s star witness to prove that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter’s business schemes testified under oath that Biden didn’t talk business?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man to think we would know nothing if not for the laptop from hell.

Yes. If not for the laptop, the most corrupt family in history would have gotten away with everything. The amount of corruption is staggering, and nobody knew about it until a small computer was broken into.

"everything" such as?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, where’s the crime?

Bribery, unlike Trump who was impeached

You have no evidence of bribery, unlike the Trump case when he said before I give you the money that Congress appropriated for you, I need you to do me a political favor.

We have Joe on video telling the story about how he got the prosecutor in Ukraine fired.
Just like the owner of Burisma wanted.

The former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, George Kent, testified in Trump's impeachment inquiry that Shokin, the Ukrainian prosecutor was corrupt and should be fired; the US and its allies had made a coordinated effort to oust him. Biden was the public voice of that effort, but it had worldwide support including the GOP in the senate.

He was fired for NOT INVESTIGATING BURISMA. I don't know where you get the bolded. Burisma was corrupt and Shokin was removed because he wouldn't investigate them. Once he was removed, the corrpution at Burisma was removed as well.

That is what happened. That is what the testimony under oath yielded during the Trump impeachment. That all happened before Joe Biden decided to run for president.

Devon Archer.

[Anonymous]

Nothing shady is going on with Hunter Biden and his overseas business.”

“Hunter’s laptop is Russian disinformation.”

“Okay, the laptop is real but it doesn’t prove anything.”

“There is no proof who ‘the Big Guy’ is.”

“Okay, the Big Guy is Joe Biden but he still didn’t do anything wrong.”

“Joe Biden never got paid for Hunter’s overseas business dealings.”

“Okay, Hunter Biden said Joe got paid but there is no proof.”

“Joe Biden had no knowledge of his son’s business dealings.”

“Okay, Joe knew about the dealings but he didn’t partake in them.”

“Okay, Joe took business calls with Hunter but they were just talking about the weather!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The GOP’s star witness to prove that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter’s business schemes testified under oath that Biden didn’t talk business?

...according to Dan Goldman. We all know better. Some of us just refuse to admit it.
The message was.... "I have influence with my dad who has power in DC."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The GOP’s star witness to prove that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter’s business schemes testified under oath that Biden didn’t talk business?

...according to Dan Goldman. We all know better. Some of us just refuse to admit it.
The message was.... "I have influence with my dad who has power in DC."

Talk about being willfully obtuse...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The GOP’s star witness to prove that Joe Biden was involved in Hunter’s business schemes testified under oath that Biden didn’t talk business?

...according to Dan Goldman. We all know better. Some of us just refuse to admit it.
The message was.... "I have influence with my dad who has power in DC."

Not a crime

[Anonymous]

Go watch the lies Joe Biden told the first time he ran for President. Decades ago. Then, come back and tell us how he is telling the truth now.

He had to drop out because he was caught plagiarizing. But, the lies were also egregious. "Top of his class in law school." "only one with a full ride",etc.

That has not changed.

[Anonymous]

Seems on par.