TJ Comp Sci choices

[Anonymous]

Would like to hear from parents of TJ kids who took up Foundations Comp Sci Course Accelerated option with Python / Java instead of the Foundations with Java alone. The course description says it is intended for those with 1 year experience but not ready for AP comp sci direcctly, instead is a better preparation for AP comp sci course than the base course.

[Anonymous]

Our DS did Acc. CompSci since he had 1 year of Java learning experience and also didn't want to rush into taking AP CompSci. It is pretty normal class if your kid has done some programming in past. Lots of labs and programming exercises in HW. Our DD definitely feels ready for AP CompSci next year. thanks!

[Anonymous]

And our DC took non accelerated Comp Sci and was very ready for AP Comp Sci.

[Anonymous]

Thanks. Just wanted to get a sense of work involved.

[Anonymous]

The regular CS class is perfectly adequate preparation for AP CS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And our DC took non accelerated Comp Sci and was very ready for AP Comp Sci.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our DS did Acc. CompSci since he had 1 year of Java learning experience and also didn't want to rush into taking AP CompSci. It is pretty normal class if your kid has done some programming in past. Lots of labs and programming exercises in HW. Our DD definitely feels ready for AP CompSci next year. thanks!

Same here. Our child was self-taught when it came to Java, so it was useful to be taught in a formal setting to learn efficient code. Kind of like the situation where many people can decorate a cake OK, but it takes training to make it look really good!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our DS did Acc. CompSci since he had 1 year of Java learning experience and also didn't want to rush into taking AP CompSci. It is pretty normal class if your kid has done some programming in past. Lots of labs and programming exercises in HW. Our DD definitely feels ready for AP CompSci next year. thanks!

Same here. Our child was self-taught when it came to Java, so it was useful to be taught in a formal setting to learn efficient code. Kind of like the situation where many people can decorate a cake OK, but it takes training to make it look really good!

Whatever level they teach isn't enough to make them truly knowledgeable in Java or any comp sci concepts. They are left with a lot of holes in their knowledge not knowing several key concepts, and this is fine, because these courses are supposed to be introductory, even the post-AP courses. The real learning still happens in a professional setting.