Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

I know the fans of other artists want to think that for whatever reason, but her album sales and streams are so far above any other album new releases that even without the variants, she would blow them out of the water. The stats speak to this without question. It’s just a phenomenon we haven’t seen before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

Exactly. I should have put "competitors" in quotes. She's just running her business as she fits.

[Anonymous]

[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

How old are you? Do you understand free markets? Capitalism generally? You seem confused. Did you wander out of some commune? Are these other pop stars in need of charitable help to achieve similar sales? I don’t think you have quite thought this one out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

charlie xcx that fat london pop girl?

why is this even bring mentioned, no one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

Are you also mad at whatever network purchases rights to air the Superbowl? It’s a very popular program, and that means people are probably not watching programs on competitive channels. Unfair!!!! This is a conspiracy that must be stopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

charlie xcx that fat london pop girl?

why is this even bring mentioned, no one cares.

People are trying to make it a thing because she’s dating a guy in the 1975 and wrote a diss song about one of the band members girlfriends who people were trying to say was about Taylor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her and Travis are endgame. Travis is highly driven and goal oriented and wants his threepeat and Taylor. Does anyone here understand male psychology?

He is dumb and fat. I’ve heard he can barely read. I’d never marry and procreate with him, and I am not TS who has unlimited options.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt Charli XCX cares she's far more talented than Swift anyway.

Still a shitty thing to do. She just did the same thing with Billie Eilish. She cares so much about her public perception…how does she not know how bad a look this is?

It’s why Matty etc dumped her. She is emotionally and socially stunted, which is not necessarily her fault - she’s just a product of her circumstances (in the spotlight since a young age). I like her music but not her immature personality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her and Travis are endgame. Travis is highly driven and goal oriented and wants his threepeat and Taylor. Does anyone here understand male psychology?

He is dumb and fat. I’ve heard he can barely read. I’d never marry and procreate with him, and I am not TS who has unlimited options.

What a relief for you that he’ll never ask you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her and Travis are endgame. Travis is highly driven and goal oriented and wants his threepeat and Taylor. Does anyone here understand male psychology?

He is dumb and fat. I’ve heard he can barely read. I’d never marry and procreate with him, and I am not TS who has unlimited options.

You can not like him all you want, but he has dyslexia and this comment makes you a tool.

[Anonymous]

He's fat now? I guess compared to some of these other twinks she's dated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her and Travis are endgame. Travis is highly driven and goal oriented and wants his threepeat and Taylor. Does anyone here understand male psychology?

He is dumb and fat. I’ve heard he can barely read. I’d never marry and procreate with him, and I am not TS who has unlimited options.

He’s dyslexic… so is Charles Swabb.. can’t read and often mixes up net and gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

How old are you? Do you understand free markets? Capitalism generally? You seem confused. Did you wander out of some commune? Are these other pop stars in need of charitable help to achieve similar sales? I don’t think you have quite thought this one out.

If she was a man, she’d be the man.