Nicole Shanahan says RFK Jr. campaign considering joining forces with Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harsh but fair.

They are terrible. I don't like Trump either, but making a public statement saying your own brother has betrayed the family is just flat out evil. If they truly loved their brother they would not be making public statements like this.

They have the mob mentality like the family patri-Aaah-k Joe Kennedy Sr.

I don’t understand how it’s a betrayal to have family members with different political views. Do we all have to move in packs and have herd mentality?

Apparently so to the Kennedys

Insurrection isn’t a “different political view.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harsh but fair.

They are terrible. I don't like Trump either, but making a public statement saying your own brother has betrayed the family is just flat out evil. If they truly loved their brother they would not be making public statements like this.

They have the mob mentality like the family patri-Aaah-k Joe Kennedy Sr.

I don’t understand how it’s a betrayal to have family members with different political views. Do we all have to move in packs and have herd mentality?

Apparently so to the Kennedys

I think many Democrats have this feeling of superiority and their way or the highway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that a lifelong Democrat from the most famous family of Democrats in history has concluded that the Democrats are now the party of corruption and anti-democracy ought to give the Dems reason to pause and take a close look in the mirror. It should also give them concern over the election. It will be razor thin and decided by the small number of undecided and unaffiliated voters in 8-10 states, who absolutely will listen to JFK's position that the new Dems are all about power, but have no substantive message and a hollow candidate. The fact that the Dems only response is ad hominem attacks on RFK proves his point, and shows their own lack of self-awareness.

The man had a brain worm and serious drug issues. His family has disavowed him because he is not well.

But he is totally on brand for MAGA.

His family disavowed him when he sold his soul to MAGA. They supported him until then, through his sickness.

RFK Jr asked the Harris campaign for a meeting with Kamala. Kamala said no.

Which was the correct thing to do.

Why?

DP.

One does not give every crackpot that wants to meet with you, a meeting.

I have not been a huge fan of Harris. But the discipline with which she has run this campaign so far, her choice of VP, and the decision to not give any air to conspiracy theorist nut jobs has made me come around on her.

This is the part that should be said out loud every single day. We’re being fleeced in this forum by the nut jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that a lifelong Democrat from the most famous family of Democrats in history has concluded that the Democrats are now the party of corruption and anti-democracy ought to give the Dems reason to pause and take a close look in the mirror. It should also give them concern over the election. It will be razor thin and decided by the small number of undecided and unaffiliated voters in 8-10 states, who absolutely will listen to JFK's position that the new Dems are all about power, but have no substantive message and a hollow candidate. The fact that the Dems only response is ad hominem attacks on RFK proves his point, and shows their own lack of self-awareness.

The man had a brain worm and serious drug issues. His family has disavowed him because he is not well.

But he is totally on brand for MAGA.

His family disavowed him when he sold his soul to MAGA. They supported him until then, through his sickness.

RFK Jr asked the Harris campaign for a meeting with Kamala. Kamala said no.

Can you provide a reputable citation to back up this comment?

Google is your friend. https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/rfk-jr-attempted-to-arrange-meeting-with-kamala-harris-sources-say/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that a lifelong Democrat from the most famous family of Democrats in history has concluded that the Democrats are now the party of corruption and anti-democracy ought to give the Dems reason to pause and take a close look in the mirror. It should also give them concern over the election. It will be razor thin and decided by the small number of undecided and unaffiliated voters in 8-10 states, who absolutely will listen to JFK's position that the new Dems are all about power, but have no substantive message and a hollow candidate. The fact that the Dems only response is ad hominem attacks on RFK proves his point, and shows their own lack of self-awareness.

The man had a brain worm and serious drug issues. His family has disavowed him because he is not well.

But he is totally on brand for MAGA.

His family disavowed him when he sold his soul to MAGA. They supported him until then, through his sickness.

RFK Jr asked the Harris campaign for a meeting with Kamala. Kamala said no.

Which was the correct thing to do.

Why?

DP.

One does not give every crackpot that wants to meet with you, a meeting.

I have not been a huge fan of Harris. But the discipline with which she has run this campaign so far, her choice of VP, and the decision to not give any air to conspiracy theorist nut jobs has made me come around on her.

Me, too. Really appreciating the good judgment and disciplined campaigning so far.

Kamala has not sat for a single interview nor has she held a single press conference

Her presidential website only contains her bio and multiple links to donate money to her campaign.

She hasn’t released a single policy statement nor has she released a platform.

How is that disciplined campaigning?

She received the democratic presidential nomination without winning a single vote, delegate, or state in the primary.

This is beyond ludicrous.

What she's doing is working for her. So far, no one seems to care that she doesn't have reams of policy papers, except a few people on internet fora. Mrs. Clinton had reams of policy papers on her website, which no one really read, and look where that got her. I'm sure that if it benefits her to do interviews or publish policy papers or whatever, then she will. Part of running a disciplined campaign, is not getting in your own way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only way forced birth will ever gain traction is if we can prove and show that the mortality rate and injury to women is less than 1% for every pregnancy..... Otherwise you were asking a woman to literally risk her life.... Something no man ever has to do for another human being. Not even his own children that are living

Pregnancy isn’t airborne. There’s way to avoid it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only way forced birth will ever gain traction is if we can prove and show that the mortality rate and injury to women is less than 1% for every pregnancy..... Otherwise you were asking a woman to literally risk her life.... Something no man ever has to do for another human being. Not even his own children that are living

Pregnancy isn’t airborne. There’s way to avoid it

Not only that, but I guarantee there is a less than 1% chance of death for pregnant women, especially when factoring in the ability to abort after life threatening issues are identified for the woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Bobby Kennedy represents many Trump voters.

They don’t agree with Trump on every single issue. But, on the issues most important to them, they are in lockstep with Trump.

At least Trump was willing to listen to RFK and engage with him on commonalities.

This is why Trump was great with foreign leaders too. He knows how to build alliances even with enemies. Democrats don’t know how to listen or negotiate. They have zero finesse. Zero skill. Zero way to be dominant and get their rivals on their corner. Trump just made someone he was running against now in his corner and convinced him to take his name off the rolls in swing states, and endorse him in exchange for a cabinet position.

Genius master stroke.

Democrats just lost a Kennedy to the Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Bobby Kennedy represents many Trump voters.

They don’t agree with Trump on every single issue. But, on the issues most important to them, they are in lockstep with Trump.

At least Trump was willing to listen to RFK and engage with him on commonalities.

This is why Trump was great with foreign leaders too. He knows how to build alliances even with enemies. Democrats don’t know how to listen or negotiate. They have zero finesse. Zero skill. Zero way to be dominant and get their rivals on their corner. Trump just made someone he was running against now in his corner and convinced him to take his name off the rolls in swing states, and endorse him in exchange for a cabinet position.

Genius master stroke.

Democrats just lost a Kennedy to the Republicans.

Not one worth fighting for

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only way forced birth will ever gain traction is if we can prove and show that the mortality rate and injury to women is less than 1% for every pregnancy..... Otherwise you were asking a woman to literally risk her life.... Something no man ever has to do for another human being. Not even his own children that are living

Pregnancy isn’t airborne. There’s way to avoid it

Not only that, but I guarantee there is a less than 1% chance of death for pregnant women, especially when factoring in the ability to abort after life threatening issues are identified for the woman.

It’s a false argument anyway because the vast majority of abortions are not because women are “fearful of giving birth” as most of those women go on to give birth in the future anyway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Bobby Kennedy represents many Trump voters.

They don’t agree with Trump on every single issue. But, on the issues most important to them, they are in lockstep with Trump.

At least Trump was willing to listen to RFK and engage with him on commonalities.

This is why Trump was great with foreign leaders too. He knows how to build alliances even with enemies. Democrats don’t know how to listen or negotiate. They have zero finesse. Zero skill. Zero way to be dominant and get their rivals on their corner. Trump just made someone he was running against now in his corner and convinced him to take his name off the rolls in swing states, and endorse him in exchange for a cabinet position.

Genius master stroke.

Democrats just lost a Kennedy to the Republicans.

Trump can keep the crackpot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Bobby Kennedy represents many Trump voters.

They don’t agree with Trump on every single issue. But, on the issues most important to them, they are in lockstep with Trump.

At least Trump was willing to listen to RFK and engage with him on commonalities.

This is why Trump was great with foreign leaders too. He knows how to build alliances even with enemies. Democrats don’t know how to listen or negotiate. They have zero finesse. Zero skill. Zero way to be dominant and get their rivals on their corner. Trump just made someone he was running against now in his corner and convinced him to take his name off the rolls in swing states, and endorse him in exchange for a cabinet position.

Genius master stroke.

Democrats just lost a Kennedy to the Republicans.

Not one worth fighting for

The point is Trump knows how to break eggs and make omelet.

Democrats are dumb strategy wise and too ideologically radical to be pragmatist with world leaders or domestic.

A smart DNC would’ve given people like RFK Jr or Jill Stein some sort of bone instead of acting like they’re too stupid to live.

The hubris and arrogance of the Dem Party is disgusting. While they were mocking assasination attempts, couches, and hand size and rich people all on the world stage, Trump was reaching across the aisle and breaking bread with a political rival instead of trying to mock or kill his political rival.

[Anonymous]

If women can abort, men should be able to be deadbeats and cancel child support.

Why can only women reject parenthood when they feel like it? “It’s a woman’s body” and it’s their physical burden but it’s also a man’s biggest financial burden.

Why can’t he be a deadbeat without social derision or the state mandating child support?

This is the problem with feminism gone amuk

[Anonymous]

Many things have gone awry, but hopefully a Trump and RFK administration will have us on the mend to gender equity and male empowerment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Bobby Kennedy represents many Trump voters.

They don’t agree with Trump on every single issue. But, on the issues most important to them, they are in lockstep with Trump.

At least Trump was willing to listen to RFK and engage with him on commonalities.

This is why Trump was great with foreign leaders too. He knows how to build alliances even with enemies. Democrats don’t know how to listen or negotiate. They have zero finesse. Zero skill. Zero way to be dominant and get their rivals on their corner. Trump just made someone he was running against now in his corner and convinced him to take his name off the rolls in swing states, and endorse him in exchange for a cabinet position.

Genius master stroke.

Democrats just lost a Kennedy to the Republicans.

Yeah, you've said the whole "genius master stroke" thing before. You are easily impressed.

This is what we call a dodged bullet, soon. You'll see.