Roy Moore the Pedophile

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.


If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.


Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "


Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.


Obtuse really applies to the Wapo and everyone who wants to read nefarious, evil, perverted intent into a grown man wooing a grown woman.

I still say prove it with the 14 year old, which has nothing to do with whether he bought *gasp* an 18 year old alcohol.

Our society, or certain segments of it rather, are becoming rather puritanical as of late. Hard to believe normal, healthy behavior of being attracted to and trying to date a fully grown woman is suddenly a scandal. I weep for the future and our society's critical reasoning abilities.


Have you forgotten that we’re discussing someone who’s been called the Ayatollah of Alabama? Puritanical? Nah. Neanderthal


I am still failing to see the problem with a 32 year old asking an 18 year old woman out. It's as if his political opponents want this to be seen in the same light as Harvey Weinstein raping actresses in his hotel room. Society is becoming a Starr Chamber.


Fabulous movie reference. Huge points, PP! You are correct - the liberals have seen the success outing Hollywood slime and said "Look, this works...let's do this to conservatives", forgetting that the liberals like Weinstein and Spacey are actually checking themselves into sex rehab clinics, and with other liberals like Weiner, there are photos and texts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nothing puritanical about not wanting a 32 year old lawyer representing the government to NOT prey on a 14 year old at a custody hearing. F-ING disgusting frankly. Talk about grooming. Just a grotesque abuse of power and child. So he only felt her up and tried to get her to touch his p—s instead of more, still the act of a pedophile. That he did the same with several others is just more gross. IMO He needs to be on a sex offender registry — after being convicted of assault on a minor.


The GOP is circling its wagons around a predator. Brilliant. I’m grown tired of all the WINNING.


And this conservative female is sick and tired of watching men get railroaded by liberals, unless they are men of color or of their pet religions that consistently treat women like garbage. Duke case taught you nothing. Atlanta bombing case taught you nothing. Brawley case taught you nothing. UVA case taught you nothing. But when women are consistently sentenced to beatings for BEING raped, and little boys are raped on our military bases in Afghanistan, it's 'culture'.

Liberals are the epitome of hypocrisy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.


You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.


If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.


Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "


Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.


Obtuse really applies to the Wapo and everyone who wants to read nefarious, evil, perverted intent into a grown man wooing a grown woman.

I still say prove it with the 14 year old, which has nothing to do with whether he bought *gasp* an 18 year old alcohol.

Our society, or certain segments of it rather, are becoming rather puritanical as of late. Hard to believe normal, healthy behavior of being attracted to and trying to date a fully grown woman is suddenly a scandal. I weep for the future and our society's critical reasoning abilities.


Have you forgotten that we’re discussing someone who’s been called the Ayatollah of Alabama? Puritanical? Nah. Neanderthal


I am still failing to see the problem with a 32 year old asking an 18 year old woman out. It's as if his political opponents want this to be seen in the same light as Harvey Weinstein raping actresses in his hotel room. Society is becoming a Starr Chamber.


Fabulous movie reference. Huge points, PP! You are correct - the liberals have seen the success outing Hollywood slime and said "Look, this works...let's do this to conservatives", forgetting that the liberals like Weinstein and Spacey are actually checking themselves into sex rehab clinics, and with other liberals like Weiner, there are photos and texts.


In other words these Democrats (none of whom is running for office) have admired their guilt and are paying the price. Apparently Republicans don't have to when they do the same slimey things?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.


You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.


Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.


Clinton molested a 14 year old???
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.


Clinton molested a 14 year old???


Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

It's astonishing. After all their islamophobia because Mohammad had a 14 year old wife - a thing I only know because some bigots posting in here in years past felt this proved that Islam was a terrible religion - this case, of a lawyer picking up a child outside her custody hearing and then trying to initiate sex? turns out to be the second coming of Jesus, Mary and Joseph (land that's according to an actual GOPer!).

Hypocrites. Disgusting filthy hypocrites.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.


Clinton molested a 14 year old???


Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.

Here in realityland, that very well sourced article with four victims is acceptable public proof. I can understand that your Fox addled brain means a certain impervious to facts lack of understanding, but that's where the normal people are with this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.


You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.


Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?


How do you know she's a republican? Because she told the press?

Why did Brawley lie? Why did the UVA chick lie?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.


Clinton molested a 14 year old???


Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.


Do you demand that of every accuser?

I believe a woman who told others at the time and her mother some years later. They've confirmed it. Why do you believe all these people are lying? Where's YOUR proof?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.


Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.


Clinton molested a 14 year old???


Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.

Here in realityland, that very well sourced article with four victims is acceptable public proof. I can understand that your Fox addled brain means a certain impervious to facts lack of understanding, but that's where the normal people are with this.


No, it's really not. Not when a 'well sourced article' comes from a paper that openly endorses the opposing candidate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.


You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.



The Wall Street Journal spoke to the same people, and they reiterated what they told the Washington Post. The Post did approach them. That's called reporting.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: