Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:a few months ago on STM they were talking about how whenever they googled their names or their personal websites it would get redirected to something else. (ex. if you googled stm.com or whatever their website is it took you to the definition of 'failure', if you google tybentley.com it took you to the wiki page for diarrhea.) They said they had a feeling they knew who it was and they would update us when they found out. I suspected it was intern john but does anyone know if they ever followed up on that?

Yes, they were able to prove thanks to some outside help (go back on the podcasts, you can get it on iTunes) how everything was done. It came from someone at 1801 Rockville Pike, where the 99.5 studio is located.

I can understand why they were upset, but this is seriously hysterical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:a few months ago on STM they were talking about how whenever they googled their names or their personal websites it would get redirected to something else. (ex. if you googled stm.com or whatever their website is it took you to the definition of 'failure', if you google tybentley.com it took you to the wiki page for diarrhea.) They said they had a feeling they knew who it was and they would update us when they found out. I suspected it was intern john but does anyone know if they ever followed up on that?

Yes, they were able to prove thanks to some outside help (go back on the podcasts, you can get it on iTunes) how everything was done. It came from someone at 1801 Rockville Pike, where the 99.5 studio is located.

I can understand why they were upset, but this is seriously hysterical.

What whiny brats they are. It is funny.

Sarah is awful.

[Anonymous]

N won't remarry until her alimony runs out. I'd guess 2years from when the divorce is final.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

[Anonymous]

Thank goodness for satellite radio - we can listen to LA and NYC stations and don't have to deal with the idiocy of Kane or STM. Both shows are just awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

Natasha is a narcissist, like narcissistic personality disorder. Women in abusive situations do not take their families (mom, sister, uncle) on a fabulous beach vacation on the abusive husband's dime and post it on Instagram after they "escape." A woman who just left an abusive situation would not be flaunting her lack of a wedding ring on Instsagram, dying for people to comment and ask her what is going on. Women in abusive relationships don't leave their social media profiles up, public, and open to comments after being blasted on the radio. She is loving the attention.

Don't hold your breath for a real response from her any time soon. She'll keep posting her phony sweet nonsense to keep everyone's attention but she isn't going to be able to say anything of substance until she gets as much out of him as she can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

Natasha is a narcissist, like narcissistic personality disorder. Women in abusive situations do not take their families (mom, sister, uncle) on a fabulous beach vacation on the abusive husband's dime and post it on Instagram after they "escape." A woman who just left an abusive situation would not be flaunting her lack of a wedding ring on Instsagram, dying for people to comment and ask her what is going on. Women in abusive relationships don't leave their social media profiles up, public, and open to comments after being blasted on the radio. She is loving the attention.

Don't hold your breath for a real response from her any time soon. She'll keep posting her phony sweet nonsense to keep everyone's attention but she isn't going to be able to say anything of substance until she gets as much out of him as she can.

And he's the one who couldn't just respond to the rumors that were flying by simply saying, "Yes, we're getting a divorce, it's hard for everyone so please let my family have their privacy right now." No, he decided to air a bunch of dirty laundry in the hopes of getting public sympathy in his favor. Best case scenario, he's just an asshole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

Natasha is a narcissist, like narcissistic personality disorder. Women in abusive situations do not take their families (mom, sister, uncle) on a fabulous beach vacation on the abusive husband's dime and post it on Instagram after they "escape." A woman who just left an abusive situation would not be flaunting her lack of a wedding ring on Instsagram, dying for people to comment and ask her what is going on. Women in abusive relationships don't leave their social media profiles up, public, and open to comments after being blasted on the radio. She is loving the attention.

Don't hold your breath for a real response from her any time soon. She'll keep posting her phony sweet nonsense to keep everyone's attention but she isn't going to be able to say anything of substance until she gets as much out of him as she can.

I truly hope she is not bashing him to the kids (& anyone who will listen in front of the kids) trying to turn them against him. The term is parental alienation. A lot of narcissistic mothers do this.

As my husband and I kissed our DD tonight I thought about Kane (&other parents going through something similar ) not being able to kiss their children goodnight. So sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

Natasha is a narcissist, like narcissistic personality disorder. Women in abusive situations do not take their families (mom, sister, uncle) on a fabulous beach vacation on the abusive husband's dime and post it on Instagram after they "escape." A woman who just left an abusive situation would not be flaunting her lack of a wedding ring on Instsagram, dying for people to comment and ask her what is going on. Women in abusive relationships don't leave their social media profiles up, public, and open to comments after being blasted on the radio. She is loving the attention.

Don't hold your breath for a real response from her any time soon. She'll keep posting her phony sweet nonsense to keep everyone's attention but she isn't going to be able to say anything of substance until she gets as much out of him as she can.

Exactly! You can totally see this by what she's posting on IG. I agree 110%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband is a workaholic and can be challenging to live with. I think he is undiagnosed for having something..In any case, I have at times wanted out. I'm still with him because he's a very good man who works very hard. Even during my WORST moments, (did I mention I also have an Autistic son?), would I EVER have done what N did. If what she did really did happen, he's better off without her. She sounds mentally weak to me.

What she did is also very consistent with strategies recommended for abuse victims trying to escape their marriages. He's probably a total sociopath.

Natasha is a narcissist, like narcissistic personality disorder. Women in abusive situations do not take their families (mom, sister, uncle) on a fabulous beach vacation on the abusive husband's dime and post it on Instagram after they "escape." A woman who just left an abusive situation would not be flaunting her lack of a wedding ring on Instsagram, dying for people to comment and ask her what is going on. Women in abusive relationships don't leave their social media profiles up, public, and open to comments after being blasted on the radio. She is loving the attention.

Don't hold your breath for a real response from her any time soon. She'll keep posting her phony sweet nonsense to keep everyone's attention but she isn't going to be able to say anything of substance until she gets as much out of him as she can.

I truly hope she is not bashing him to the kids (& anyone who will listen in front of the kids) trying to turn them against him. The term is parental alienation. A lot of narcissistic mothers do this.

As my husband and I kissed our DD tonight I thought about Kane (&other parents going through something similar ) not being able to kiss their children goodnight. So sad.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201304/the-impact-parental-alienation-children

What children of divorce most want and need is to maintain healthy and strong relationships with both of their parents, and to be shielded from their parents' conflicts. Some parents, however, in an effort to bolster their parental identity, create an expectation that children choose sides. In more extreme situations, they foster the child’s rejection of the other parent. In the most extreme cases, children are manipulated by one parent to hate the other, despite children’s innate desire to love and be loved by both their parents.

Parental alienation involves the “programming” of a child by one parent to denigrate the other “targeted” parent, in an effort to undermine and interfere with the child's relationship with that parent, and is often a sign of a parent’s inability to separate from the couple conflict and focus on the needs of the child. Such denigration results in the child’s emotional rejection of the targeted parent, and the loss of a capable and loving parent from the life of the child

[Anonymous]

It's curious, on her March 30th blog post (her last one to date), she says, "For some reason I’m exhausted today too. I was exhausted the whole weekend actually. Last week was such a blur of stress & ‘have-to’s’ that I know my body is now going into ‘sleep mode’ because the battery is completed void of it’s resources."

This was 2 days before she allegedly left. Wonder what that list of 'have-to's' entailed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201304/the-impact-parental-alienation-children

What children of divorce most want and need is to maintain healthy and strong relationships with both of their parents, and to be shielded from their parents' conflicts. Some parents, however, in an effort to bolster their parental identity, create an expectation that children choose sides. In more extreme situations, they foster the child’s rejection of the other parent. In the most extreme cases, children are manipulated by one parent to hate the other, despite children’s innate desire to love and be loved by both their parents.

Parental alienation involves the “programming” of a child by one parent to denigrate the other “targeted” parent, in an effort to undermine and interfere with the child's relationship with that parent, and is often a sign of a parent’s inability to separate from the couple conflict and focus on the needs of the child. Such denigration results in the child’s emotional rejection of the targeted parent, and the loss of a capable and loving parent from the life of the child

Oh she's doing that. I will not get into specifics, but the things she's done lately are disturbing and not healthy. Truly unfathomable things. Just the fact (yes it is fact) that she refused to let them go see his mom and it took them 6 hours to convince her, probably with an attorney involved, goes to show she has already been using them as leverage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201304/the-impact-parental-alienation-children

What children of divorce most want and need is to maintain healthy and strong relationships with both of their parents, and to be shielded from their parents' conflicts. Some parents, however, in an effort to bolster their parental identity, create an expectation that children choose sides. In more extreme situations, they foster the child’s rejection of the other parent. In the most extreme cases, children are manipulated by one parent to hate the other, despite children’s innate desire to love and be loved by both their parents.

Parental alienation involves the “programming” of a child by one parent to denigrate the other “targeted” parent, in an effort to undermine and interfere with the child's relationship with that parent, and is often a sign of a parent’s inability to separate from the couple conflict and focus on the needs of the child. Such denigration results in the child’s emotional rejection of the targeted parent, and the loss of a capable and loving parent from the life of the child

Oh she's doing that. I will not get into specifics, but the things she's done lately are disturbing and not healthy. Truly unfathomable things. Just the fact (yes it is fact) that she refused to let them go see his mom and it took them 6 hours to convince her, probably with an attorney involved, goes to show she has already been using them as leverage.

I assume that since you seem to know the inside details, you are a friend or family member of hers. That you would betray her like this says very poor things about your character, which in turns means there's probably about a 50/50 chance of this being true and not just random bullshit you made up.

[Anonymous]

Think whatever you want about my identity. It doesn't change the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/co-parenting-after-divorce/201304/the-impact-parental-alienation-children

What children of divorce most want and need is to maintain healthy and strong relationships with both of their parents, and to be shielded from their parents' conflicts. Some parents, however, in an effort to bolster their parental identity, create an expectation that children choose sides. In more extreme situations, they foster the child’s rejection of the other parent. In the most extreme cases, children are manipulated by one parent to hate the other, despite children’s innate desire to love and be loved by both their parents.

Parental alienation involves the “programming” of a child by one parent to denigrate the other “targeted” parent, in an effort to undermine and interfere with the child's relationship with that parent, and is often a sign of a parent’s inability to separate from the couple conflict and focus on the needs of the child. Such denigration results in the child’s emotional rejection of the targeted parent, and the loss of a capable and loving parent from the life of the child

Oh she's doing that. I will not get into specifics, but the things she's done lately are disturbing and not healthy. Truly unfathomable things. Just the fact (yes it is fact) that she refused to let them go see his mom and it took them 6 hours to convince her, probably with an attorney involved, goes to show she has already been using them as leverage.

I assume that since you seem to know the inside details, you are a friend or family member of hers. That you would betray her like this says very poor things about your character, which in turns means there's probably about a 50/50 chance of this being true and not just random bullshit you made up.

Not necessarily. It could be someone who doesn't/never liked her but does like Kane. Or it could be someone 1000% making it up.