OJ simpson Died

[Anonymous]

For anyone who need to visualize how one person could have done this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8zt4anqnJoc


He did it. The end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Phone records and Nicole’s own mother initially said she was on the phone with Nicole after 11pm that day. Nicole’s phone records were sealed and the judge said they weren’t relevant. Of course they’re relevant. Oj was at the airport after 11pm . Why can’t they release her phone records if there’s nothing to hide? Oj was totally framed

JFC with the phone records. Had the phone records actually demonstrated that Nicole was speaking with her mom after 11 pm, after OJ was already in the limo headed to the airport, this trial never would have happened. I know you’re not a lawyer, but that is something called Brady evidence, and something the defense would have an absolute right to. The fact that Judge Ito didn’t give it to them means the records did not show a phone call between Nicole and her mom after 11 pm. Or wait, was Judge Ito out to frame OJ too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Phone records and Nicole’s own mother initially said she was on the phone with Nicole after 11pm that day. Nicole’s phone records were sealed and the judge said they weren’t relevant. Of course they’re relevant. Oj was at the airport after 11pm . Why can’t they release her phone records if there’s nothing to hide? Oj was totally framed

JFC with the phone records. Had the phone records actually demonstrated that Nicole was speaking with her mom after 11 pm, after OJ was already in the limo headed to the airport, this trial never would have happened. I know you’re not a lawyer, but that is something called Brady evidence, and something the defense would have an absolute right to. The fact that Judge Ito didn’t give it to them means the records did not show a phone call between Nicole and her mom after 11 pm. Or wait, was Judge Ito out to frame OJ too

I know you aren’t a lawyer. Under Brady, the prosecution , (which includes the state and cops for those that aren’t legally inclined) only have to disclose to the defense “clearly exculpatory evidence” .

You’re a moral person I’d hope so of course to you , you don’t see how anyone can be a suspect if an alibi checks out. What I’m telling you is it absolutely happens . Cops have tunnel vision and ignore anything that doesn’t fit the narrative. They are the prosecutions case and are the most powerful in this link. They make the case before the case even starts , they present all the evidence, the prosecutors simply are the mouthpiece and believe what the cops tell them to believe.

Even with all of Ojs money and fame, the state spent twice as much as he did to try to convict him and they still lost. If the case was a slam dunk as people say; such an effort by the state to prove beyond reasonable doubt wouldn’t be needed. There was such a heavy push to convict OJ but when one leaves emotions aside and simply looks at the case objectively, one can see how the timeline, logistics of double stabbing two people at once as a lone Wolf, and boarding a limo and plane in half an hour just doesn’t make sense .

[Anonymous]

What Brady means is because the prosecution only has to show “clearly exculpatory evidence” and “not all exculpatory evidence”, the scales are usually heavy skewed toward conviction. Conviction rates again are what everyone in the state from cops to the DA office rely on due to elections and tax funding .

Do you know how many hundreds of leads come into police departments and are ignored? They have to find the person who is mostly likely to be convicted not most likely to be the suspect . That’s their one and only job. Once you put that in perspective, it’s obvious why OJ would be suspect number 1 and all the other leads into the victims lifestyles and criminal associates would be ignored

[Anonymous]

If any criminal defendant wins a criminal trial; it’s virtually proof of innocence . That’s how unusual it is for a defendant to beat the state:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Phone records and Nicole’s own mother initially said she was on the phone with Nicole after 11pm that day. Nicole’s phone records were sealed and the judge said they weren’t relevant. Of course they’re relevant. Oj was at the airport after 11pm . Why can’t they release her phone records if there’s nothing to hide? Oj was totally framed

JFC with the phone records. Had the phone records actually demonstrated that Nicole was speaking with her mom after 11 pm, after OJ was already in the limo headed to the airport, this trial never would have happened. I know you’re not a lawyer, but that is something called Brady evidence, and something the defense would have an absolute right to. The fact that Judge Ito didn’t give it to them means the records did not show a phone call between Nicole and her mom after 11 pm. Or wait, was Judge Ito out to frame OJ too

I know you aren’t a lawyer. Under Brady, the prosecution , (which includes the state and cops for those that aren’t legally inclined) only have to disclose to the defense “clearly exculpatory evidence” .

You’re a moral person I’d hope so of course to you , you don’t see how anyone can be a suspect if an alibi checks out. What I’m telling you is it absolutely happens . Cops have tunnel vision and ignore anything that doesn’t fit the narrative. They are the prosecutions case and are the most powerful in this link. They make the case before the case even starts , they present all the evidence, the prosecutors simply are the mouthpiece and believe what the cops tell them to believe.

Even with all of Ojs money and fame, the state spent twice as much as he did to try to convict him and they still lost. If the case was a slam dunk as people say; such an effort by the state to prove beyond reasonable doubt wouldn’t be needed. There was such a heavy push to convict OJ but when one leaves emotions aside and simply looks at the case objectively, one can see how the timeline, logistics of double stabbing two people at once as a lone Wolf, and boarding a limo and plane in half an hour just doesn’t make sense .

Dumb@ss, I was a prosecutor for over a decade. You duck every single thing I post because you can’t refute it. You were blathering on and on about the phone records and that Judge Ito sealed them, but they clearly show Nicole alive and talking to her mom during the time where OJ squarely has an alibi. And I am telling you point blank that Judge Ito would not have sealed any such records because they would be clearly exculpatory. That limo driver was probably the best witness in the whole case, and if phone records had established that Nicole was alive and well after the limo driver laid eyes on OJ, this case never gets prosecuted. But continue on with your conspiracy theories that are playing fast and loose with the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What Brady means is because the prosecution only has to show “clearly exculpatory evidence” and “not all exculpatory evidence”, the scales are usually heavy skewed toward conviction. Conviction rates again are what everyone in the state from cops to the DA office rely on due to elections and tax funding .

Do you know how many hundreds of leads come into police departments and are ignored? They have to find the person who is mostly likely to be convicted not most likely to be the suspect . That’s their one and only job. Once you put that in perspective, it’s obvious why OJ would be suspect number 1 and all the other leads into the victims lifestyles and criminal associates would be ignored

Oh good Lord! If Nicole was talking on the phone with her mom at 11 pm, when OJ had a clear alibi (on his way to Chicago), it would in fact be “clearly exculpatory evidence,” that the judge would have to release and which would force the DA to drop his case.

Wowza!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What Brady means is because the prosecution only has to show “clearly exculpatory evidence” and “not all exculpatory evidence”, the scales are usually heavy skewed toward conviction. Conviction rates again are what everyone in the state from cops to the DA office rely on due to elections and tax funding .

Do you know how many hundreds of leads come into police departments and are ignored? They have to find the person who is mostly likely to be convicted not most likely to be the suspect . That’s their one and only job. Once you put that in perspective, it’s obvious why OJ would be suspect number 1 and all the other leads into the victims lifestyles and criminal associates would be ignored

This is not at all an accurate representation of the law surrounding Brady evidence. Shocker.

[Anonymous]

Fewer than 1% of criminal defendants are acquitted .

In fiscal year 2022, only 290 of 71,954 defendants in federal criminal cases – about 0.4% – went to trial and were acquitted.

And the numbers were worse in the 90s. Very very rare is this to happen. The cop had to make a huge messed up job or get the wrong guy .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Brady means is because the prosecution only has to show “clearly exculpatory evidence” and “not all exculpatory evidence”, the scales are usually heavy skewed toward conviction. Conviction rates again are what everyone in the state from cops to the DA office rely on due to elections and tax funding .

Do you know how many hundreds of leads come into police departments and are ignored? They have to find the person who is mostly likely to be convicted not most likely to be the suspect . That’s their one and only job. Once you put that in perspective, it’s obvious why OJ would be suspect number 1 and all the other leads into the victims lifestyles and criminal associates would be ignored

This is not at all an accurate representation of the law surrounding Brady evidence. Shocker.

Yes it is but keep gaslighting

[Anonymous]

What is exculpatory evidence?

Exculpatory evidence is evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial that exonerates or tends to exonerate the defendant of guilt.

Who controls exculpatory evidence?
Prosecution.

Do they have to release all exculpatory evidence ? No.

What does this mean?

Convictions are practically guaranteed as the defense can’t get a word in or any evidence on their side out

OJ not getting convicted is because unlike all of us, the jury was sequestered from media /wall to wall 24/7 media coverage that sensationalized this case and leaned toward OJ being guilty . They were able to see the case objectively and see the doubts with the most corrupt police force in the nation, the LAPD.

The prosecution even had to get rid of the original coroner who said two knives were used after they realized it wouldn’t make sense for both of Ojs hands to be wielding knives and two people. It was such a forced case from the beginning because the LAPD didn’t want to look into Nicole and Faye’s cokehead habits, debts, and Ron the Boy Scouts drug dealer connections because this would open Pandora’s box and the LAPD connections to the restaurant Mezzaluna and drug dealing would be exposed . They wanted OJ because he would be easier to convict or so they thought

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Phone records and Nicole’s own mother initially said she was on the phone with Nicole after 11pm that day. Nicole’s phone records were sealed and the judge said they weren’t relevant. Of course they’re relevant. Oj was at the airport after 11pm . Why can’t they release her phone records if there’s nothing to hide? Oj was totally framed

JFC with the phone records. Had the phone records actually demonstrated that Nicole was speaking with her mom after 11 pm, after OJ was already in the limo headed to the airport, this trial never would have happened. I know you’re not a lawyer, but that is something called Brady evidence, and something the defense would have an absolute right to. The fact that Judge Ito didn’t give it to them means the records did not show a phone call between Nicole and her mom after 11 pm. Or wait, was Judge Ito out to frame OJ too

I know you aren’t a lawyer. Under Brady, the prosecution , (which includes the state and cops for those that aren’t legally inclined) only have to disclose to the defense “clearly exculpatory evidence” .

You’re a moral person I’d hope so of course to you , you don’t see how anyone can be a suspect if an alibi checks out. What I’m telling you is it absolutely happens . Cops have tunnel vision and ignore anything that doesn’t fit the narrative. They are the prosecutions case and are the most powerful in this link. They make the case before the case even starts , they present all the evidence, the prosecutors simply are the mouthpiece and believe what the cops tell them to believe.

Even with all of Ojs money and fame, the state spent twice as much as he did to try to convict him and they still lost. If the case was a slam dunk as people say; such an effort by the state to prove beyond reasonable doubt wouldn’t be needed. There was such a heavy push to convict OJ but when one leaves emotions aside and simply looks at the case objectively, one can see how the timeline, logistics of double stabbing two people at once as a lone Wolf, and boarding a limo and plane in half an hour just doesn’t make sense .

Dumb@ss, I was a prosecutor for over a decade. You duck every single thing I post because you can’t refute it. You were blathering on and on about the phone records and that Judge Ito sealed them, but they clearly show Nicole alive and talking to her mom during the time where OJ squarely has an alibi. And I am telling you point blank that Judge Ito would not have sealed any such records because they would be clearly exculpatory. That limo driver was probably the best witness in the whole case, and if phone records had established that Nicole was alive and well after the limo driver laid eyes on OJ, this case never gets prosecuted. But continue on with your conspiracy theories that are playing fast and loose with the facts.

Oh, dear. Phone records are not hard evidence on a crime scene. You have to procure them but one can’t do so without permission . The judge refused to procure them because he said they weren’t relevant to the case.

Duh. The judge and prosecutor and cops all work together. That’s why acquittal is highly unusual. The chips are stacked against a defendant -not even including media and court reporters. The only hope they have are two things: 1. Good defense lawyers , 2. The jury .

The phone records were never even procured . The defense tried to get them but Judge Ito said no.

[Anonymous]

The other exculpatory evidence were the 17 fingerprints found which they gave to defense but they aren’t legally required to give everything only what is clearly exculpatory . Other things that don’t fall into evidence like phone records, investigating friends or coworkers of Ron’s or Faye’s cannot be done by defense. Only the police can investigate which means the defense is limited to what they can present without the judges permission.

It’s scary this even has to be explained to grown adults.

Side note: Judge Ito endorsed Christopher Darden when he ran for judge. Judges have wide discretion over deciding what qualifies as potential evidence and no judge wants to be seen as against the cops on anything

There’s a prosecutor and judge rapport there that just isn’t there with most defense lawyers .

[Anonymous]

There’s also no DNA or fingerprints inside the glove .

If that doesn’t prove it’s planted..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Phone records and Nicole’s own mother initially said she was on the phone with Nicole after 11pm that day. Nicole’s phone records were sealed and the judge said they weren’t relevant. Of course they’re relevant. Oj was at the airport after 11pm . Why can’t they release her phone records if there’s nothing to hide? Oj was totally framed

JFC with the phone records. Had the phone records actually demonstrated that Nicole was speaking with her mom after 11 pm, after OJ was already in the limo headed to the airport, this trial never would have happened. I know you’re not a lawyer, but that is something called Brady evidence, and something the defense would have an absolute right to. The fact that Judge Ito didn’t give it to them means the records did not show a phone call between Nicole and her mom after 11 pm. Or wait, was Judge Ito out to frame OJ too

I know you aren’t a lawyer. Under Brady, the prosecution , (which includes the state and cops for those that aren’t legally inclined) only have to disclose to the defense “clearly exculpatory evidence” .

You’re a moral person I’d hope so of course to you , you don’t see how anyone can be a suspect if an alibi checks out. What I’m telling you is it absolutely happens . Cops have tunnel vision and ignore anything that doesn’t fit the narrative. They are the prosecutions case and are the most powerful in this link. They make the case before the case even starts , they present all the evidence, the prosecutors simply are the mouthpiece and believe what the cops tell them to believe.

Even with all of Ojs money and fame, the state spent twice as much as he did to try to convict him and they still lost. If the case was a slam dunk as people say; such an effort by the state to prove beyond reasonable doubt wouldn’t be needed. There was such a heavy push to convict OJ but when one leaves emotions aside and simply looks at the case objectively, one can see how the timeline, logistics of double stabbing two people at once as a lone Wolf, and boarding a limo and plane in half an hour just doesn’t make sense .

Dumb@ss, I was a prosecutor for over a decade. You duck every single thing I post because you can’t refute it. You were blathering on and on about the phone records and that Judge Ito sealed them, but they clearly show Nicole alive and talking to her mom during the time where OJ squarely has an alibi. And I am telling you point blank that Judge Ito would not have sealed any such records because they would be clearly exculpatory. That limo driver was probably the best witness in the whole case, and if phone records had established that Nicole was alive and well after the limo driver laid eyes on OJ, this case never gets prosecuted. But continue on with your conspiracy theories that are playing fast and loose with the facts.

Oh, dear. Phone records are not hard evidence on a crime scene. You have to procure them but one can’t do so without permission . The judge refused to procure them because he said they weren’t relevant to the case.

Duh. The judge and prosecutor and cops all work together. That’s why acquittal is highly unusual. The chips are stacked against a defendant -not even including media and court reporters. The only hope they have are two things: 1. Good defense lawyers , 2. The jury .

The phone records were never even procured . The defense tried to get them but Judge Ito said no.

https://www.deseret.com/1994/8/14/19125061/time-of-nicole-simpson-call-disputed/
Try again, the prosecution and defense had the records.