GOP endorsed school board candidates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

Seems as if OP authored half the responses in this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

I don’t want another Elizabeth Schultz?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here they are. All the liberal keyboard warriors coming out and calling everyone dumb or pathetic for being tired of what the current school board has been doing the past 4 years and wanting to vote for a change. Please tell me more about something completely irrelevant to education policy so that I will vote for continuing the insanity the current school board has created.

+ a million
So many insecure, gaslighting Democrats who would love to continue the status quo - which doesn’t have anything to do with actual academics. No thanks. Vote them out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

+1
I have no doubt the OP is the same poster who complained on Website Feedback about all the “lies” on this thread. “Lies” meaning anything she doesn’t agree with and wants to silence. That’s the SB/Democrats’ mentality in a nutshell.

[Anonymous]

Why did four of the Republicans not fill out the Washington post questionnaire

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did four of the Republicans not fill out the Washington post questionnaire

For the same reason that none of them have any specifics on their websites: they’re trying to hide their beliefs from the voters as much as they can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

I don’t want another Elizabeth Schultz?

Not OP and haven't really read beyond scrolling quickly b/c, well, I'll never vote for a R again. And I def don't want a diversity when it's a far right nut job. Including Elizabeth Schulz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here they are. All the liberal keyboard warriors coming out and calling everyone dumb or pathetic for being tired of what the current school board has been doing the past 4 years and wanting to vote for a change. Please tell me more about something completely irrelevant to education policy so that I will vote for continuing the insanity the current school board has created.

+ a million
So many insecure, gaslighting Democrats who would love to continue the status quo - which doesn’t have anything to do with actual academics. No thanks. Vote them out.

Nothing in the schools and SB have ANYTHING to do with academics? Nothing? It's amazing you typed that with a straight face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why did four of the Republicans not fill out the Washington post questionnaire

Probably in recognition of the fact that the Post likely will only endorse FCDC-endorsed candidates. But they should have filled out the questionnaires just to raise their profiles ever so slightly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

I don’t want another Elizabeth Schultz?

Not OP and haven't really read beyond scrolling quickly b/c, well, I'll never vote for a R again. And I def don't want a diversity when it's a far right nut job. Including Elizabeth Schulz.

You sound dense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

I don’t want another Elizabeth Schultz?

Not OP and haven't really read beyond scrolling quickly b/c, well, I'll never vote for a R again. And I def don't want a diversity when it's a far right nut job. Including Elizabeth Schulz.

You sound dense.

I don't care what you think, dingus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the OP of this thread is essentially admitting the premise of the thread was entirely farcical, created by a left wing activist to bait and fight with moderates and centrist dems who are looking for a balance in the ideological make up of the school board, and who might be considering alternatives to the D sample ballot.

Most of this thread has been dominated by far left blue Virginia types, who have no arguments or positions to defend, only slurs and insults.

I am not sure that this thread is going the way the left wing activists intended. Moderates tend to not like being insulted by politicsl activists nor are they big fans of insults as a substitute for debate of ideas.

+1000.

The funny thing is everyone knows the Democrats will almost surely retain a majority on the SB. But people like OP are so insistent on having total control and squelching any competing perspectives that they immediately call people “stupid” and pepper them with other insults when anyone suggests some contrary views might actually lead to better outcomes. They are big fans of diversity, except when it might be diversity of opinion.

I don’t want another Elizabeth Schultz?

Not OP and haven't really read beyond scrolling quickly b/c, well, I'll never vote for a R again. And I def don't want a diversity when it's a far right nut job. Including Elizabeth Schulz.

You sound dense.

I don't care what you think, dingus.

Your agit-prop for yet another all-D School Board is awfully tiring. We heard you the first 50 times you posted the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did four of the Republicans not fill out the Washington post questionnaire

For the same reason that none of them have any specifics on their websites: they’re trying to hide their beliefs from the voters as much as they can.

No, of course not. There are people who agree with their beliefs and disagree with their beliefs, they don't want to fool people. They just aren't savvy. This is the school board, for cryin' out loud. Yes, it's a large school district with a large budget in a large county, but it's still a school board. Most of the candidates, R or D or I, are just parents and/or educators who want to help, one way or another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did four of the Republicans not fill out the Washington post questionnaire

For the same reason that none of them have any specifics on their websites: they’re trying to hide their beliefs from the voters as much as they can.

No, of course not. There are people who agree with their beliefs and disagree with their beliefs, they don't want to fool people. They just aren't savvy. This is the school board, for cryin' out loud. Yes, it's a large school district with a large budget in a large county, but it's still a school board. Most of the candidates, R or D or I, are just parents and/or educators who want to help, one way or another.

Frisch is not a parent or an educator. He wants to help his political career. Do you think it counts?