Might I suggest taking your concerns to the people at DCPS headquarters who spent so much time and money developing this sorry excuse for a curriculum? |
Well, I guess 8th grade is different (as we will find out this year) but I saw my son reading yes, actual books for school. One of them was Call of the Wild, which fostered a lively debate of whether they should keep it on the curriculum, one was Roald Dahl’s Boy, which they read partially together in class and partially finished at home, and one was Nelba Marquez-Greene’s account of the integration of Little Rock High School. As I said earlier, the final unit was sci-fi and they read stories by Ray Bradbury and other more recent ones. I also know this because I was sitting in the same room with him during virtual school, so my experience is obviously very different to yours. There was a lot of writing as well because I kept having to show him how to upload things into Canvas to submit. He’s also done the summer reading - two books off a list - every year including this one. |
There’s another question hanging out there, if you can only choose 4 anchor texts per grade, what is the rationale for these four? |
First get them to read entire books and then you can go down that rabbit hole. If they dont read the entire book then your question is moot. |
Did they read the entirety of the books you mentioned? It's not quite clear and while I wouldn't have thought to ask that last week... |
This thread has good resources for supplementation, especially lower grades.
dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/716481.page |
But what do we say? It seems so absurd to ask whether interacting with a book means reading the entire thing. |
And do you know for sure that the teacher didn't tell kids to read the book? Between movies, cliffsnotes, the internet, etc.- kids have dozens of way to cut corners. They did it in the past and they are doing it now. A teacher can assign the book- but they can't guarantee that the kids will actually read it. Unless they read it in class together. And perhaps that is where they do the 1-2 chapters- with the rest being expected of the students at home. (Not saying this is true- but it is possible) |
I would start here
Why are you only requiring 4 anchor texts per year? What is the rationale for these choices? Why are you only assigning excerpts of each book? Do you consider this ELA curriculum to be sufficiently challenging? Is this curriculum something you would choose for your own child? How does this ELA curriculum compare with charter and independent schools in this area? |
OP here - thanks for this extensive list. I look forward to exploring it. |
We had a different experience at Deal in both ELA and Spanish (pre-COVID). Our kids tested into level 3 Spanish after taking Spanish II in the regular Spanish track at Deal (I will add that there was one parent who complained a lot about the teaching and Spanish curriculum, but DS said her son sat in the back goofing off every class and did no work -- which is how I know some kids are great at bamboozling their moms).
In ELA, every week we got a detailed summary of all the books and short stories and poems and essays and they were reading and comparing and writing about and using for interesting projects. There was one anchor novel per advisory, supplemented by thoughtful works in other writing formats, including film and works of art. Here are some examples from Deal weekly emails 6th grade: English: Last week, we read Tuck Everlasting chapters 15-25, continued our exploration of theme, and practiced writing a thesis about theme. This week we will finish Tuck Everlasting and complete the Anchor Writing Task, which is to write a multi-paragraph essay comparing Tuck Everlasting to "Eleven," a short story by Sandra Cisneros. Here are some excerpts from Deal emails 7th grade (not in succession): English (Ms. ____): Next week in English we will begin reading the book Warriors Don't Cry by Melba Patillo Beals. Beals' memoir about her experiences as one of The Little Rock Nine won a Congressional Gold Medal. English (Ms. ____): Next week students will be finishing an activity where they will be comparing and contrasting the author's point of view in two texts. English (Ms. _____): Next week in English students will wrap up their Literature Circle books. On Tuesday and Wednesday students will present their Reader's Theatre scenes. This presentation will count for their first IB Task grade for advisory 4. [note here that Literature Circle is a text that is not one of the 4 anchor texts; in every grade they studied books beyond the anchor texts] "English (Ms. _____): Next week in English, students will have the Reading Inventory test on Monday and Tuesday. In addition, students will present and hand in their Hero's Journey and Enrichment Projects on Friday, June 9. Please make sure that you remind your child to find and return any books that we have used in English this year. Titles include: Warriors Don't Cry, The Ear, The Eye and The Arm, Boy and The Call of the Wild. " If people are claiming their kids read no book in three years at Deal, sounds like a COVID problem or a kid problem, maybe? |
in the abstract some of those choices make sense- an entire year on 4 seminal texts (especially something with layers like Moby Dick or that defines an archetype like the Odyssey) makes a ton of sense. What doesn't make sense if focusing on 4 and then barely reading them let alone concentrating on them |
Not to ovwrly parse and your point about kids bamboozling parents is true BUT only one of those emails implied that an entire book was being read. |
there is nothing comparable to Virgil or Melville on the list of anchor texts. I would hardly call Tuck Everlasting or Inside Out and Back Again seminal. |
Similar experience here. We also had links to reading calendars in the newsletters (broken down by what would be read in class and what was expected hw reading). Although, admittedly, my kid said there were not many consequences for not doing the reading. |