Jeffrey Toobin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

At least his hands are where you can see them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was on a conference call and it was clear one of the men were JO. Finally someone said....your mic is on. We all knew who it was. He didn't get fired. This is DoD

How on earth could that be proven?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

At least his hands are where you can see them.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

I think Toobin and Weiner should host a show together on CNN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We’ve got God knows how many lawyers in this country, yet CNN says ‘let’s go with Toobin’ for our Legal Analyst.

Hello-- yes! Absolutely! Epitome of white male privilege. Everyone whines about trans rights, gay rights, etc. But, no one cares about women + how offensive this turd has been to women. Tell me CNN could not find any women + minority folks to be legal commentators. Whoever wrote that he is good knows nothing about the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Toobin and Weiner should host a show together on CNN.

The show could be called “Circle Time with Toobin & Weiner”. Might boost CNN’s ratings.

[Anonymous]

Ewwwww. Does she has to shake hands with Toobin? Yuck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

At least his hands are where you can see them.

Why on earth didn’t they have a man interview him? How humiliating for that woman to have to ask him about the masturbating episode.

[Anonymous]

Plus she was extremely outspoken about her time at Fox. Now she has to buddy up to this colleague.

[Anonymous]

The basis of his legal analysis is bring critical and judgmental of others’ actions and motives. If he thinks a “I didn’t mean it…. Didn’t think the camera was on” defense is legit, then he will not be an effective at his job.

Also if CNN wants to bd trusted, if I think about this every time I see him or he says something that reminds DS me of this, then he us not being effective.

I think this is a mistake fir CNN. There has to be some thing in his contract where they can legally let him go even tho this happened at another “company” call. It just pay him. Their reputation should be Worth more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The basis of his legal analysis is bring critical and judgmental of others’ actions and motives. If he thinks a “I didn’t mean it…. Didn’t think the camera was on” defense is legit, then he will not be an effective at his job.

Also if CNN wants to bd trusted, if I think about this every time I see him or he says something that reminds DS me of this, then he us not being effective.

I think this is a mistake fir CNN. There has to be some thing in his contract where they can legally let him go even tho this happened at another “company” call. It just pay him. Their reputation should be Worth more.

Why isn't he being treated/arrested like others who've been caught exposing themselves?

[Anonymous]

Toobin got the Obamacare Supreme Court verdict wrong. Live on air. A lot of people would have lost their job for that oopsie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’ve got God knows how many lawyers in this country, yet CNN says ‘let’s go with Toobin’ for our Legal Analyst.

Hello-- yes! Absolutely! Epitome of white male privilege. Everyone whines about trans rights, gay rights, etc. But, no one cares about women + how offensive this turd has been to women. Tell me CNN could not find any women + minority folks to be legal commentators. Whoever wrote that he is good knows nothing about the law.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’ve got God knows how many lawyers in this country, yet CNN says ‘let’s go with Toobin’ for our Legal Analyst.

Hello-- yes! Absolutely! Epitome of white male privilege. Everyone whines about trans rights, gay rights, etc. But, no one cares about women + how offensive this turd has been to women. Tell me CNN could not find any women + minority folks to be legal commentators. Whoever wrote that he is good knows nothing about the law.

+100

yup

[Anonymous]

Cable news is basically dead. And the head of CNN clearly lacks judgment.