Ed Henry, Sean Hannity & Tucker Carlson Sued In Blockbuster Sexual Harassment & Assault Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker must be taken down- he is the most dangerous man in America.

If speaking the truth and pointing out the hypocrisy in our government, then Tucker is a great man and far from dangerous.

Even though Tucker knew that the New York Times doesn’t publish addresses, he claimed last night that they were going to. He then encouraged his followers to dox everyone involved with the story - which, again, at no time were they publishing his address - and they did. “ Carlson also mentioned photographer Tristan Spinski and the Times’s media editor Jim Windolf by name.
“How would Murray Carpenter and his photographer, Tristan Spinski, feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air?” Carlson asked. “What if we published the home address of every one of the soulless, robot editors at the New York Times, who assigned and managed this incitement of violence against my family?" He added: “We could do that. We know who they are.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/21/tucker-carlson-new-york-times/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-tucker%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans#comments-wrapper

Face it. Tucker doesn’t speak truth to anyone. He is trash, absolute scum, and you idolize him, for some reason.

You don't need to publish an address to disclose enough information for bad actors to figure out where you live. And, his home in DC was such a target a couple of years ago.
This type of behavior is common practice for the NYTimes.....

Blogger....https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-slate-star-codex-doxxing-is-the-latest-squabble-inside-new-york-times
Whistleblower.....https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/26/new-york-times-whistleblower-trump-ukraine-228529
CIA agents......https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/us/politics/deep-support-in-washington-for-cias-drone-missions.html?_r=0

So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved? How does that work in your mind, exactly? The New York Times didn’t dox anyone, but Tucker’s followers did, and you’re taking issue with the NYT? Huh. Anything to avoid taking responsibility, I guess.

Here is the full segment from last night.
Provide the time stamp where he told his followers to do anything........'

LOL.
Here is your statement, friend....

"So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved?"


Provide proof that Carlson did any such thing.

Actual evidence that NYT intends to publish his address: Zero.
Actual evidence that Carlson wants his viewers to teach NYT a lesson: One very angry video in which he thows it to his audience as a "what if".

Tucker Carlson is reportedly a smart person. This is the obvious result of his actions. Even if it weren't, one would think he would severely chastise his audience for engaging in criminal behavior in support of him. I wouldn't hold my breath for that one.

[Anonymous]

Tonight on Tucker Carlson: "Dear audience. I know you like me, but you just committed a terrible crime in my name, you f*ing morons! Turn yourselves in!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her lawsuit is already falling apart. Tucker Carlson's wife was with him in NYC that night. Mrs. Carlson was at the referenced holiday party.

Gosh, I don’t know that I’d use her as my source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her lawsuit is already falling apart. Tucker Carlson's wife was with him in NYC that night. Mrs. Carlson was at the referenced holiday party.

Gosh, I don’t know that I’d use her as my source.

She seems like EXACTLY the type that NYT would offer an editors job to—perhaps in culture or society.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker must be taken down- he is the most dangerous man in America.

If speaking the truth and pointing out the hypocrisy in our government, then Tucker is a great man and far from dangerous.

Even though Tucker knew that the New York Times doesn’t publish addresses, he claimed last night that they were going to. He then encouraged his followers to dox everyone involved with the story - which, again, at no time were they publishing his address - and they did. “ Carlson also mentioned photographer Tristan Spinski and the Times’s media editor Jim Windolf by name.
“How would Murray Carpenter and his photographer, Tristan Spinski, feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air?” Carlson asked. “What if we published the home address of every one of the soulless, robot editors at the New York Times, who assigned and managed this incitement of violence against my family?" He added: “We could do that. We know who they are.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/21/tucker-carlson-new-york-times/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-tucker%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans#comments-wrapper

Face it. Tucker doesn’t speak truth to anyone. He is trash, absolute scum, and you idolize him, for some reason.

You don't need to publish an address to disclose enough information for bad actors to figure out where you live. And, his home in DC was such a target a couple of years ago.
This type of behavior is common practice for the NYTimes.....

Blogger....https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-slate-star-codex-doxxing-is-the-latest-squabble-inside-new-york-times
Whistleblower.....https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/26/new-york-times-whistleblower-trump-ukraine-228529
CIA agents......https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/us/politics/deep-support-in-washington-for-cias-drone-missions.html?_r=0

So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved? How does that work in your mind, exactly? The New York Times didn’t dox anyone, but Tucker’s followers did, and you’re taking issue with the NYT? Huh. Anything to avoid taking responsibility, I guess.

Here is the full segment from last night.
Provide the time stamp where he told his followers to do anything........'

LOL.
Here is your statement, friend....

"So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved?"


Provide proof that Carlson did any such thing.

Actual evidence that NYT intends to publish his address: Zero.
Actual evidence that Carlson wants his viewers to teach NYT a lesson: One very angry video in which he thows it to his audience as a "what if".

Tucker Carlson is reportedly a smart person. This is the obvious result of his actions. Even if it weren't, one would think he would severely chastise his audience for engaging in criminal behavior in support of him. I wouldn't hold my breath for that one.

I see you have ZERO evidence that he ever said such a thing.

And, as far as the NY Times is concerned..... they have doxxed others in the recent past. No reason to think they weren't planning on it again.

[Anonymous]

This...... is Cathy Areu.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker must be taken down- he is the most dangerous man in America.

If speaking the truth and pointing out the hypocrisy in our government, then Tucker is a great man and far from dangerous.

Even though Tucker knew that the New York Times doesn’t publish addresses, he claimed last night that they were going to. He then encouraged his followers to dox everyone involved with the story - which, again, at no time were they publishing his address - and they did. “ Carlson also mentioned photographer Tristan Spinski and the Times’s media editor Jim Windolf by name.
“How would Murray Carpenter and his photographer, Tristan Spinski, feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air?” Carlson asked. “What if we published the home address of every one of the soulless, robot editors at the New York Times, who assigned and managed this incitement of violence against my family?" He added: “We could do that. We know who they are.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/21/tucker-carlson-new-york-times/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-tucker%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans#comments-wrapper

Face it. Tucker doesn’t speak truth to anyone. He is trash, absolute scum, and you idolize him, for some reason.

You don't need to publish an address to disclose enough information for bad actors to figure out where you live. And, his home in DC was such a target a couple of years ago.
This type of behavior is common practice for the NYTimes.....

Blogger....https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-slate-star-codex-doxxing-is-the-latest-squabble-inside-new-york-times
Whistleblower.....https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/26/new-york-times-whistleblower-trump-ukraine-228529
CIA agents......https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/us/politics/deep-support-in-washington-for-cias-drone-missions.html?_r=0

So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved? How does that work in your mind, exactly? The New York Times didn’t dox anyone, but Tucker’s followers did, and you’re taking issue with the NYT? Huh. Anything to avoid taking responsibility, I guess.

Here is the full segment from last night.
Provide the time stamp where he told his followers to do anything........'

LOL.
Here is your statement, friend....

"So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved?"


Provide proof that Carlson did any such thing.

Actual evidence that NYT intends to publish his address: Zero.
Actual evidence that Carlson wants his viewers to teach NYT a lesson: One very angry video in which he thows it to his audience as a "what if".

Tucker Carlson is reportedly a smart person. This is the obvious result of his actions. Even if it weren't, one would think he would severely chastise his audience for engaging in criminal behavior in support of him. I wouldn't hold my breath for that one.

I see you have ZERO evidence that he ever said such a thing.

And, as far as the NY Times is concerned..... they have doxxed others in the recent past. No reason to think they weren't planning on it again.

Reporting on someone isn't "doxxing" them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker must be taken down- he is the most dangerous man in America.

If speaking the truth and pointing out the hypocrisy in our government, then Tucker is a great man and far from dangerous.

Even though Tucker knew that the New York Times doesn’t publish addresses, he claimed last night that they were going to. He then encouraged his followers to dox everyone involved with the story - which, again, at no time were they publishing his address - and they did. “ Carlson also mentioned photographer Tristan Spinski and the Times’s media editor Jim Windolf by name.
“How would Murray Carpenter and his photographer, Tristan Spinski, feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air?” Carlson asked. “What if we published the home address of every one of the soulless, robot editors at the New York Times, who assigned and managed this incitement of violence against my family?" He added: “We could do that. We know who they are.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/21/tucker-carlson-new-york-times/?hpid=hp_morning-mix-8-12-rr1_mm-tucker%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans#comments-wrapper

Face it. Tucker doesn’t speak truth to anyone. He is trash, absolute scum, and you idolize him, for some reason.

You don't need to publish an address to disclose enough information for bad actors to figure out where you live. And, his home in DC was such a target a couple of years ago.
This type of behavior is common practice for the NYTimes.....

Blogger....https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-slate-star-codex-doxxing-is-the-latest-squabble-inside-new-york-times
Whistleblower.....https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/26/new-york-times-whistleblower-trump-ukraine-228529
CIA agents......https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/26/us/politics/deep-support-in-washington-for-cias-drone-missions.html?_r=0

So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved? How does that work in your mind, exactly? The New York Times didn’t dox anyone, but Tucker’s followers did, and you’re taking issue with the NYT? Huh. Anything to avoid taking responsibility, I guess.

Here is the full segment from last night.
Provide the time stamp where he told his followers to do anything........'

LOL.
Here is your statement, friend....

"So you’re just going to ignore the part where Tucker quietly told his followers to dox all the reporters/photographers involved?"


Provide proof that Carlson did any such thing.

Actual evidence that NYT intends to publish his address: Zero.
Actual evidence that Carlson wants his viewers to teach NYT a lesson: One very angry video in which he thows it to his audience as a "what if".

Tucker Carlson is reportedly a smart person. This is the obvious result of his actions. Even if it weren't, one would think he would severely chastise his audience for engaging in criminal behavior in support of him. I wouldn't hold my breath for that one.

I see you have ZERO evidence that he ever said such a thing.

And, as far as the NY Times is concerned..... they have doxxed others in the recent past. No reason to think they weren't planning on it again.

Yeah, it's a total coincidence that he mentioned the reporter's name, said he "could" doxx him, and a few hours later a Carlson supporter tweeted a photo of the reporter's house. No way could Carlson have seen that coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not surprised by any of this.

I'm not surprised that - yet again - liberals are believing the first reports to come out from some accuser, with zero investigations, collaboration, or evidence. Hook, line, and sinker. So incredibly predictable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This...... is Cathy Areu.

O
M
G

Liberals - add this woman to your crazy clown car of wackos.

[Anonymous]

She's not a liberal. She's a talking head on Fox (and only Fox), albeit one whose job is to frame the "other side's" views so the bloated douchebags and dye-job bimbos on set can tut-tut in all the right places.

[Anonymous]

She’s a conservative Trumpster who desperately wanted a job at Fox.

And then she was sexually harassed.

She’s all your’s, Trump clan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a conservative Trumpster who desperately wanted a job at Fox.

And then she was sexually harassed.

She’s all your’s, Trump clan.

Not a conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's not a liberal. She's a talking head on Fox (and only Fox), albeit one whose job is to frame the "other side's" views so the bloated douchebags and dye-job bimbos on set can tut-tut in all the right places.

She is as liberal as they come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's not a liberal. She's a talking head on Fox (and only Fox), albeit one whose job is to frame the "other side's" views so the bloated douchebags and dye-job bimbos on set can tut-tut in all the right places.

She is as liberal as they come.

Evidence... https://www.today.com/parents/i-just-wanted-my-kids-share-my-politics-turns-out-t103343