VA Senate passed 3 gun laws today...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:and Just like that, liberties are slowly stripped away while the cost of enforcement continues to rise. I see the founding fathers rolling in their grave.

Don’t you dare presume to speak for the Framers. Unless you are part of a militia, you shouldn’t have any guns.

I am part of the militia. Jefferson describes the "militia" as "the whole of the people".


That's me. You too.

Amen brother!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of bayonets...why would someone think they need this:

We don't have a Bill of "Needs". We have a Bill of Rights.

I don't want you deciding what I need any more than you want me deciding what you need. Because I'm pretty sure you won't like some of things I think you can do without.

So rather than each of us start telling the other what they can't have, let's just respect each other enough to let the other person decide for themselves, m'k?


What's it called when you do that?...... oh, yeah - "Freedom".


That's with a capital "F"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:and Just like that, liberties are slowly stripped away while the cost of enforcement continues to rise. I see the founding fathers rolling in their grave.

Don’t you dare presume to speak for the Framers. Unless you are part of a militia, you shouldn’t have any guns.

I am part of the militia. Jefferson describes the "militia" as "the whole of the people".


That's me. You too.

Amen brother!

Sister actually, but thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of bayonets...why would someone think they need this:

We don't have a Bill of "Needs". We have a Bill of Rights.

I don't want you deciding what I need any more than you want me deciding what you need. Because I'm pretty sure you won't like some of things I think you can do without.

So rather than each of us start telling the other what they can't have, let's just respect each other enough to let the other person decide for themselves, m'k?


What's it called when you do that?...... oh, yeah - "Freedom".


That's with a capital "F"

What exactly would you do with this?

It looks good for cosplay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of bayonets...why would someone think they need this:

We don't have a Bill of "Needs". We have a Bill of Rights.

I don't want you deciding what I need any more than you want me deciding what you need. Because I'm pretty sure you won't like some of things I think you can do without.

So rather than each of us start telling the other what they can't have, let's just respect each other enough to let the other person decide for themselves, m'k?


What's it called when you do that?...... oh, yeah - "Freedom".


That's with a capital "F"

What exactly would you do with this?

It looks good for cosplay?

No, probably not. It's sharp and dangerous if wielded properly. That knife is for sticking in people after they've banned guns.

[Anonymous]

These laws will not have any impact on people who are law abiding gun owners. There is no reason to have opposed these.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These laws will not have any impact on people who are law abiding gun owners. There is no reason to have opposed these.

Unreasonable search and seizure would not have any impact on people who are law abiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These laws will not have any impact on criminals who simply do not obey laws, gun laws or otherwise. There is no reason to think these laws will accomplish anything other than impede people who aren't criminals to begin with. .

Fixed to reflect reality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All gun laws will fail in the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment is clear in the fact that the government is not allowed to restrict citizens' right to bear arms. "Shall NOT be infringed."

And just like that the foundation for the second American Civil War was laid in Virginia based on the VA Senate and other localities across the country trying to strip people’s right to bear arms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These laws will not have any impact on people who are law abiding gun owners. There is no reason to have opposed these.

Did you read the story about local and federal law enforcement agencies impounding cash from innocent people? Government can be corrupt and when corrupt is one of the most dangerous things we know. It is a mafia protected by the law. Scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These laws will not have any impact on people who are law abiding gun owners. There is no reason to have opposed these.

Did you read the story about local and federal law enforcement agencies impounding cash from innocent people? Government can be corrupt and when corrupt is one of the most dangerous things we know. It is a mafia protected by the law. Scary.

Yep. Govt abuses it's authority all the time. All. The. Time.

Would libs here trust Trump to treat them fairly? No? Why? Because he's said he wouldn't?

Then why would gun owners be any different when it came to a govt agency or administration that was open about not liking them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All gun laws will fail in the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment is clear in the fact that the government is not allowed to restrict citizens' right to bear arms. "Shall NOT be infringed."

And just like that the foundation for the second American Civil War was laid in Virginia based on the VA Senate and other localities across the country trying to strip people’s right to bear arms.

Yep.

And the left will fire the first shots...

[Anonymous]

Gun crazies are making fun of the Virginia House Speaker for getting carjacked.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/gun-rights-group-mocks-va-lawmaker-for-being-unarmed-during-a-carjacking/2020/01/24/e84180c2-3eb3-11ea-baca-eb7ace0a3455_story.html#click=https://t.co/sb3g3UKiDj

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gun crazies are making fun of the Virginia House Speaker for getting carjacked.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/gun-rights-group-mocks-va-lawmaker-for-being-unarmed-during-a-carjacking/2020/01/24/e84180c2-3eb3-11ea-baca-eb7ace0a3455_story.html#click=https://t.co/sb3g3UKiDj

Couldn't happen to a more deserving person. Glad she's now able to fully appreciate the defenselessness she'd like to foist on all Virginians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gun crazies are making fun of the Virginia House Speaker for getting carjacked.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/gun-rights-group-mocks-va-lawmaker-for-being-unarmed-during-a-carjacking/2020/01/24/e84180c2-3eb3-11ea-baca-eb7ace0a3455_story.html#click=https://t.co/sb3g3UKiDj

Couldn't happen to a more deserving person. Glad she's now able to fully appreciate the defenselessness she'd like to foist on all Virginians.

You think she DESERVED to get car-jacked?