Anne Hathaway is gorgeous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Four pages of trashing other women, FTMP. AS if you can change the way you are born. The patriarchy is alive and well because women fall for it. Damn.

Go back to politics. You must’ve gotten lost and ended up in beauty and fashion.

I didn't realize beauty and fashion meant trashing other women and calling their natural features "creepy and exaggerated." Do you think you are really discussing beauty and fashion--because you are not.

[Anonymous]

I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

But she is portioned and not fat.

Shouldn’t she be beautiful since that’s the main idea for beauty in that other thread?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

But she is portioned and not fat.

Shouldn’t she be beautiful since that’s the main idea for beauty in that other thread?

As that other thread suggested, height/weight proportionate is necessary but not sufficient. Once the body clears, then it's the face's turn. Beauty needs ideally a beautiful body AND a beautiful face.

My husband, specifically, thinks her features are too masculine. They look pretty to me, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Four pages of trashing other women, FTMP. AS if you can change the way you are born. The patriarchy is alive and well because women fall for it. Damn.

Go back to politics. You must’ve gotten lost and ended up in beauty and fashion.

I didn't realize beauty and fashion meant trashing other women and calling their natural features "creepy and exaggerated." Do you think you are really discussing beauty and fashion--because you are not.

This, all day. For all the obsession here in general with what’s “classy” and “trashy,” all the nitwits women who shriek about swear words and eating on the Metro, the women here nitpicking actresses are garbage, insecure women. Tiresome AF.

Maybe some of you *should* post in Politics, unless you’re too busy comparing elastic-waist Loft pants and calling others fug.

[Anonymous]

Right...because that's exactly what Hollywood is about, inner beauty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

But she is portioned and not fat.

Shouldn’t she be beautiful since that’s the main idea for beauty in that other thread?

As that other thread suggested, height/weight proportionate is necessary but not sufficient. Once the body clears, then it's the face's turn. Beauty needs ideally a beautiful body AND a beautiful face.

My husband, specifically, thinks her features are too masculine. They look pretty to me, though.

Yeah that was one suggestion from one poster. The majority said thinness is what makes someone attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Four pages of trashing other women, FTMP. AS if you can change the way you are born. The patriarchy is alive and well because women fall for it. Damn.

Go back to politics. You must’ve gotten lost and ended up in beauty and fashion.

I didn't realize beauty and fashion meant trashing other women and calling their natural features "creepy and exaggerated." Do you think you are really discussing beauty and fashion--because you are not.

This, all day. For all the obsession here in general with what’s “classy” and “trashy,” all the nitwits women who shriek about swear words and eating on the Metro, the women here nitpicking actresses are garbage, insecure women. Tiresome AF.

Maybe some of you *should* post in Politics, unless you’re too busy comparing elastic-waist Loft pants and calling others fug.

+1 .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

But she is portioned and not fat.

Shouldn’t she be beautiful since that’s the main idea for beauty in that other thread?

As that other thread suggested, height/weight proportionate is necessary but not sufficient. Once the body clears, then it's the face's turn. Beauty needs ideally a beautiful body AND a beautiful face.

My husband, specifically, thinks her features are too masculine. They look pretty to me, though.

Yeah that was one suggestion from one poster. The majority said thinness is what makes someone attractive.

I thought it was implied - pretty obvious that thinness is where it starts but other things are needed too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she's very pretty but my husband disagrees, go figure.

But she is portioned and not fat.

Shouldn’t she be beautiful since that’s the main idea for beauty in that other thread?

As that other thread suggested, height/weight proportionate is necessary but not sufficient. Once the body clears, then it's the face's turn. Beauty needs ideally a beautiful body AND a beautiful face.

My husband, specifically, thinks her features are too masculine. They look pretty to me, though.

Yeah that was one suggestion from one poster. The majority said thinness is what makes someone attractive.

I thought it was implied - pretty obvious that thinness is where it starts but other things are needed too.

Actually read the thread.

[Anonymous]

I think Ann Hathaway is quite pretty. And, I like her in interviews. Yes, she can be overly earnest, and measured, in what she says. But I find her to be intelligent, hard-working, and ethically driven.

[Anonymous]

I like her because she isn't classically beautiful. Big lips, overbite, large angular nose, saggy eyes... but it works- all together, she is attractive! Anna Kendrick- same thing. Both are 'normal' pretty. Imperfect, thus attainable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Penelope Cruz is gorgeous but Ann Hathaway reminds me of a blow up doll.

Agreed!