Tell me about owning a bird.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have never allowed my son to have birds. I don't believe in them as pets. Birds were meant to fly and we are not equipped to offer them an appropriate environment. Also, birds can be quite difficult to care for properly.


+1

It is cruel to own a caged bird.


Do you have a cat? Keeping your cat indoors is unnatural and cruel, but that’s absolutely what you should be doing because cats are invasive species and kill millions of rodents and birds, who didn’t evolve to deal with housecats, every year.

Keeping fish in an unclean fish tank is cruel.

Keeping a dog and not giving it love and attention is cruel.

Pet ownership is s mixed bag everywhere, and there’s plenty of cruelty to go around. A well-socialized bird with plenty of time outside the cage and maybe a bird friend is no worse than any of the scenarios above.


Cats are the oldest domesticated animal on earth. Domesticated cats and dogs bear very little resemblance to their ancient ancestors. Birds are not even classified as domesticated. They are native species exploited by the pet industry. They are considered captive WILD animals. Dogs and Cats have EVOLVED to live with humans. Birds in the wild have a natural range of THOUSANDS of miles. A bird does not belong in a cage. Even if it gets to fly around your townhouse banging into windows.

Comparing a dog and cat to birds is just idiotic. Birds do not belong as pets. Period.

Owning a bird is ignorant and low class.


Gosh, you’re really ignorant.

Sure, cats have been domesticated—as mousers in your barn and fields. Not sleeping all day on your chair, which is a very recent development. Talk to any TNR nutcase about how cats need to exercise their “natural instincts” by going outside. (I keep my cat inside because of the damage to wildlife, but I give her enrichment.) It’s widely accepted that cats are not really domesticated—read “The Tiger in Your Living Room” and educate yourself.

I’m all for adopting parrots (and cats and dogs) instead of going to breeders. But you clearly know nothing about parrots. With lots of socialization, they can be very happy, and live longer. You seem to have a misty-eyed vision of nature, which is actually, as they say, red in tooth and claw.

And low class? Don’t make yourself look ridiculous. Dolly Madison and Winston Churchill owned parrots. Also, pretty sure I’d outclass you on nearly every measure (family, antiques, education) so don’t pull that DCUM class-obsessing nonsense.

Signed, we own a parrot and a cat


Dp. You do know TRL is to reduce the cat population eventually? The majority of people who do this not because they beliebe in natural instincts but that many of these cats are unadoptable and are feral. Recently there has been a push to get people to adopt feral cats to kill rats and other pests.

Please stop with thy he name calling. Those who TNR are not nutcases. You accuse the pp of ignorance. Mayybe you should look in the mirror


Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.
Anonymous
Where do you live, OP? Forgive if I missed it. How about a small flock of chickens? My boys do care for their chickens. We have 8. Also, they sell the eggs. Chicks are super fun and loveable, then they go outside when they are bigger and messier.

They can be very affectionate if you raise them well. My girls and my rooster are delightful pets. Mine can free range during the day on our farm, but they have tons of cute urban coops. If you live on a small property, only get hens.

I recommend something cute. We have Eastern Eggers....they lay organic blue and green eggs. It also teaches my boys about working for money as they care for the chickens but can keep the money they earn selling eggs. Of course this is subsidized by us on some of the costs, but it is a start to teaching entrepreneurism.
Anonymous
Forgot to mention, join Backyard chickens on FB to learn about chicken care. Tons of info and a supportive group. We ordered our day old chicks from Mypetchicken.com but you will habe to wait to get just a few, they only ship in bulk this time of year so the chicks don’t die of cold.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have never allowed my son to have birds. I don't believe in them as pets. Birds were meant to fly and we are not equipped to offer them an appropriate environment. Also, birds can be quite difficult to care for properly.


+1

It is cruel to own a caged bird.


Do you have a cat? Keeping your cat indoors is unnatural and cruel, but that’s absolutely what you should be doing because cats are invasive species and kill millions of rodents and birds, who didn’t evolve to deal with housecats, every year.

Keeping fish in an unclean fish tank is cruel.

Keeping a dog and not giving it love and attention is cruel.

Pet ownership is s mixed bag everywhere, and there’s plenty of cruelty to go around. A well-socialized bird with plenty of time outside the cage and maybe a bird friend is no worse than any of the scenarios above.


Cats are the oldest domesticated animal on earth. Domesticated cats and dogs bear very little resemblance to their ancient ancestors. Birds are not even classified as domesticated. They are native species exploited by the pet industry. They are considered captive WILD animals. Dogs and Cats have EVOLVED to live with humans. Birds in the wild have a natural range of THOUSANDS of miles. A bird does not belong in a cage. Even if it gets to fly around your townhouse banging into windows.

Comparing a dog and cat to birds is just idiotic. Birds do not belong as pets. Period.

Owning a bird is ignorant and low class.


Gosh, you’re really ignorant.

Sure, cats have been domesticated—as mousers in your barn and fields. Not sleeping all day on your chair, which is a very recent development. Talk to any TNR nutcase about how cats need to exercise their “natural instincts” by going outside. (I keep my cat inside because of the damage to wildlife, but I give her enrichment.) It’s widely accepted that cats are not really domesticated—read “The Tiger in Your Living Room” and educate yourself.

I’m all for adopting parrots (and cats and dogs) instead of going to breeders. But you clearly know nothing about parrots. With lots of socialization, they can be very happy, and live longer. You seem to have a misty-eyed vision of nature, which is actually, as they say, red in tooth and claw.

And low class? Don’t make yourself look ridiculous. Dolly Madison and Winston Churchill owned parrots. Also, pretty sure I’d outclass you on nearly every measure (family, antiques, education) so don’t pull that DCUM class-obsessing nonsense.

Signed, we own a parrot and a cat


Dp. You do know TRL is to reduce the cat population eventually? The majority of people who do this not because they beliebe in natural instincts but that many of these cats are unadoptable and are feral. Recently there has been a push to get people to adopt feral cats to kill rats and other pests.

Please stop with thy he name calling. Those who TNR are not nutcases. You accuse the pp of ignorance. Mayybe you should look in the mirror


Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.


I am well aware of Pete Mara and his bizarre anti-cat agenda. Read outside of him, would be my recommendation.

Killing outdoor cats - which is what Mara advocates, along with some other members of the bird community - doesn't lead to fewer outdoor cats, and doesn't accomplish what he and the other bird people want to accomplish. TNR is the only effective way of reducing outdoor cat populations. It's really strange that the anti-cat people would prefer to kill cats instead of fix them even though doing so is both crueler and less effective.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have never allowed my son to have birds. I don't believe in them as pets. Birds were meant to fly and we are not equipped to offer them an appropriate environment. Also, birds can be quite difficult to care for properly.


+1

It is cruel to own a caged bird.


Do you have a cat? Keeping your cat indoors is unnatural and cruel, but that’s absolutely what you should be doing because cats are invasive species and kill millions of rodents and birds, who didn’t evolve to deal with housecats, every year.

Keeping fish in an unclean fish tank is cruel.

Keeping a dog and not giving it love and attention is cruel.

Pet ownership is s mixed bag everywhere, and there’s plenty of cruelty to go around. A well-socialized bird with plenty of time outside the cage and maybe a bird friend is no worse than any of the scenarios above.


Cats are the oldest domesticated animal on earth. Domesticated cats and dogs bear very little resemblance to their ancient ancestors. Birds are not even classified as domesticated. They are native species exploited by the pet industry. They are considered captive WILD animals. Dogs and Cats have EVOLVED to live with humans. Birds in the wild have a natural range of THOUSANDS of miles. A bird does not belong in a cage. Even if it gets to fly around your townhouse banging into windows.

Comparing a dog and cat to birds is just idiotic. Birds do not belong as pets. Period.

Owning a bird is ignorant and low class.


Gosh, you’re really ignorant.

Sure, cats have been domesticated—as mousers in your barn and fields. Not sleeping all day on your chair, which is a very recent development. Talk to any TNR nutcase about how cats need to exercise their “natural instincts” by going outside. (I keep my cat inside because of the damage to wildlife, but I give her enrichment.) It’s widely accepted that cats are not really domesticated—read “The Tiger in Your Living Room” and educate yourself.

I’m all for adopting parrots (and cats and dogs) instead of going to breeders. But you clearly know nothing about parrots. With lots of socialization, they can be very happy, and live longer. You seem to have a misty-eyed vision of nature, which is actually, as they say, red in tooth and claw.

And low class? Don’t make yourself look ridiculous. Dolly Madison and Winston Churchill owned parrots. Also, pretty sure I’d outclass you on nearly every measure (family, antiques, education) so don’t pull that DCUM class-obsessing nonsense.

Signed, we own a parrot and a cat


Dp. You do know TRL is to reduce the cat population eventually? The majority of people who do this not because they beliebe in natural instincts but that many of these cats are unadoptable and are feral. Recently there has been a push to get people to adopt feral cats to kill rats and other pests.

Please stop with thy he name calling. Those who TNR are not nutcases. You accuse the pp of ignorance. Mayybe you should look in the mirror


Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.


I am well aware of Pete Mara and his bizarre anti-cat agenda. Read outside of him, would be my recommendation.

Killing outdoor cats - which is what Mara advocates, along with some other members of the bird community - doesn't lead to fewer outdoor cats, and doesn't accomplish what he and the other bird people want to accomplish. TNR is the only effective way of reducing outdoor cat populations. It's really strange that the anti-cat people would prefer to kill cats instead of fix them even though doing so is both crueler and less effective.


^ additionally, it's only two groups that phrase this debate in the terms you've used. PETA, which is a bunch of evil anti-animal crazies who actually prefer killing animals to saving them often on the grounds that death is kinder than the risk of death; I could post links for days, and bird people like Pete Mara. Every true animal welfare group supports TNR. Because it's humane and effective.
Anonymous
Birds live for a really time- possibly decades. They poop everywhere. They're hard to train/discipline. It's a lifestyle.
Anonymous
Owning a bird is for the birds.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh man we had neighbors who had a huge cockatiel. That thing was a NIGHTMARE. Screamed all the time, would repeat the same phrases over and over (one of which was SHUT UP!).


Yup. My friend in high school had a big cockatoo. ALL it did was scream her name (in her mom's voice, which was sorta funny, until the 1,000th time you hear it). Crapped all over its cage. Much less rewarding than a dog or a cat.


We had one in a group house. Nightmare. It screamed a lot. Then one roommate got mad at it and hit it. More screaming. As this was SOCAL hopefully someone just opened the window and let it go.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have never allowed my son to have birds. I don't believe in them as pets. Birds were meant to fly and we are not equipped to offer them an appropriate environment. Also, birds can be quite difficult to care for properly.


+1

It is cruel to own a caged bird.


Do you have a cat? Keeping your cat indoors is unnatural and cruel, but that’s absolutely what you should be doing because cats are invasive species and kill millions of rodents and birds, who didn’t evolve to deal with housecats, every year.

Keeping fish in an unclean fish tank is cruel.

Keeping a dog and not giving it love and attention is cruel.

Pet ownership is s mixed bag everywhere, and there’s plenty of cruelty to go around. A well-socialized bird with plenty of time outside the cage and maybe a bird friend is no worse than any of the scenarios above.


Cats are the oldest domesticated animal on earth. Domesticated cats and dogs bear very little resemblance to their ancient ancestors. Birds are not even classified as domesticated. They are native species exploited by the pet industry. They are considered captive WILD animals. Dogs and Cats have EVOLVED to live with humans. Birds in the wild have a natural range of THOUSANDS of miles. A bird does not belong in a cage. Even if it gets to fly around your townhouse banging into windows.

Comparing a dog and cat to birds is just idiotic. Birds do not belong as pets. Period.

Owning a bird is ignorant and low class.


This, all this and especially the last sentence.

Probably one of the most ignorant choices in "pets" there are. Along the lines of those flying squirrels.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.

I am well aware of Pete Mara and his bizarre anti-cat agenda. Read outside of him, would be my recommendation.

Killing outdoor cats - which is what Mara advocates, along with some other members of the bird community - doesn't lead to fewer outdoor cats, and doesn't accomplish what he and the other bird people want to accomplish. TNR is the only effective way of reducing outdoor cat populations. It's really strange that the anti-cat people would prefer to kill cats instead of fix them even though doing so is both crueler and less effective.

^ additionally, it's only two groups that phrase this debate in the terms you've used. PETA, which is a bunch of evil anti-animal crazies who actually prefer killing animals to saving them often on the grounds that death is kinder than the risk of death; I could post links for days, and bird people like Pete Mara. Every true animal welfare group supports TNR. Because it's humane and effective.

Pete Marra does NOT advocate killing cats. That’s a lie perpetuated by the TNR folks. He advocates dealing with cats responsibly. He actually says that capturing all feral cats is “hardly practical” and punts on the question of how to deal with feral cats.

I remember a few years when his book came out, hundreds of you TNR folks went on Amazon and trashed his book without reading it, as many of you proudly admitted, and as you’re admitting now. Amazon had to delete most of your posts.

Most “true” nature groups actually think feral and outdoor cats are a travesty, contrary to what you say. Cats are invasive species, damage the environment, kill native animals, and have already driven dozens of species to extinction. Sterilization doesn’t solve any of that because you can’t capture and sterilize all feral cats, not even in most individual colonies. And why are the “bird people” you denigrate wrong, so that native bird (and small mammal and reptile species) have less rights than your invasive cats? I don’t belong to PETA although I do contribute to City Wildlife and the American Bird Conservancy (which also thinks TNR is a crock).

I’ve never met the Marta, but he’s an internationally-respected Smithsonian scientist. He knows a thing or two about the science. Sorry if you’re on the payroll of Alley Cat Allies, but facts are facts. TNR is cruel to cats and doesn’t work.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.


I am well aware of Pete Mara and his bizarre anti-cat agenda. Read outside of him, would be my recommendation.

Killing outdoor cats - which is what Mara advocates, along with some other members of the bird community - doesn't lead to fewer outdoor cats, and doesn't accomplish what he and the other bird people want to accomplish. TNR is the only effective way of reducing outdoor cat populations. It's really strange that the anti-cat people would prefer to kill cats instead of fix them even though doing so is both crueler and less effective.

^ additionally, it's only two groups that phrase this debate in the terms you've used. PETA, which is a bunch of evil anti-animal crazies who actually prefer killing animals to saving them often on the grounds that death is kinder than the risk of death; I could post links for days, and bird people like Pete Mara. Every true animal welfare group supports TNR. Because it's humane and effective.

Pete Marra does NOT advocate killing cats. That’s a lie perpetuated by the TNR folks. He advocates dealing with cats responsibly. He actually says that capturing all feral cats is “hardly practical” and punts on the question of how to deal with feral cats.

I remember a few years when his book came out, hundreds of you TNR folks went on Amazon and trashed his book without reading it, as many of you proudly admitted, and as you’re admitting now. Amazon had to delete most of your posts.

Most “true” nature groups actually think feral and outdoor cats are a travesty, contrary to what you say. Cats are invasive species, damage the environment, kill native animals, and have already driven dozens of species to extinction. Sterilization doesn’t solve any of that because you can’t capture and sterilize all feral cats, not even in most individual colonies. And why are the “bird people” you denigrate wrong, so that native bird (and small mammal and reptile species) have less rights than your invasive cats? I don’t belong to PETA although I do contribute to City Wildlife and the American Bird Conservancy (which also thinks TNR is a crock).

I’ve never met the Marta, but he’s an internationally-respected Smithsonian scientist. He knows a thing or two about the science. Sorry if you’re on the payroll of Alley Cat Allies, but facts are facts. TNR is cruel to cats and doesn’t work.

Yes, much better to kill cats in order to save them. TNR is the only humane and effective way to manage outdoor cats. I do not work for Alley Cat Allies, but I am pretty sure I know who you work for. Say hi to Ingrid.
Anonymous
Reposting for formatting.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Multiple studies have shown that TNR doesn’t work unless you can catch and neuter the entire feral cat population. Since this is impossible, TNR does not work. Meanwhile the feral cats are disease-ridden, get hit by cats, and worse. TNR is really inhumane.


^ where are you getting that nonsense from? TNR is effective and humane - and, importantly, is much more effective and humane than the alternatives. I work in animal welfare - I know the studies.


Read Pete Marra’s Book a year or two ago and there are multiple studies that say TNR doesn’t work. In Florida and Texas for starters, I think, but no longer have the book. If you work for the Ally Cat Allies, or the program on Oglethorpe street that does TNR, then it’s highly unlikely you’d be aware of these studies.

Feeding cats so they live longer before they die of disease or freeze to death or get hit by a car is the opposite of humane.


I am well aware of Pete Mara and his bizarre anti-cat agenda. Read outside of him, would be my recommendation.

Killing outdoor cats - which is what Mara advocates, along with some other members of the bird community - doesn't lead to fewer outdoor cats, and doesn't accomplish what he and the other bird people want to accomplish. TNR is the only effective way of reducing outdoor cat populations. It's really strange that the anti-cat people would prefer to kill cats instead of fix them even though doing so is both crueler and less effective.


^ additionally, it's only two groups that phrase this debate in the terms you've used. PETA, which is a bunch of evil anti-animal crazies who actually prefer killing animals to saving them often on the grounds that death is kinder than the risk of death; I could post links for days, and bird people like Pete Mara. Every true animal welfare group supports TNR. Because it's humhane and effective.


Pete Marra does NOT advocate killing cats. That’s a lie perpetuated by the TNR folks. He advocates dealing with cats responsibly. He actually says that capturing all feral cats is “hardly practical” and punts on the question of how to deal with feral cats.

I remember a few years when his book came out, hundreds of you TNR folks went on Amazon and trashed his book without reading it, as many of you proudly admitted, and as you’re admitting now. Amazon had to delete most of your posts.

Most “true” nature groups actually think feral and outdoor cats are a travesty, contrary to what you say. Cats are invasive species, damage the environment, kill native animals, and have already driven dozens of species to extinction. Sterilization doesn’t solve any of that because you can’t capture and sterilize all feral cats, not even in most individual colonies. And why are the “bird people” you denigrate wrong, so that native bird (and small mammal and reptile species) have less rights than your invasive cats? I don’t belong to PETA although I do contribute to City Wildlife and the American Bird Conservancy (which also thinks TNR is a crock).

I’ve never met Marra, but he’s an internationally-respected Smithsonian scientist. He knows a thing or two about the science. Just because you’re on the payroll of Alley Cat Allies, or volunteer for them, doesn’t negate the facts. TNR is cruel to cats and doesn’t work.
post reply Forum Index » Pets
Message Quick Reply
Go to: