Um--you're the one who keeps defending a person you don't even know. I don't have fragile feelings about her. I think she's a publicity whore--you just said you agree. That is my whole feeling about her. You can continue to like her. It's ok. |
She's a celebrity. She promotes her own image and engages in activities that use her image for gain. Do you think that all celebrities are "publicity whores"? Have you ever purchased an item that is branded with the name of the celebrity creator of that item? An item of clothing? A cosmetic? Are musicians publicity whores when they perform their music or talk about their music in the media? I think you have issues with fame, but I think that you are biased against this particular woman for reasons that you would not apply to others. That's fine. People are allowed to have preferences. |
| I like her. I think she's funny and pretty and her personality (minus the annoying political stuff that comes out of her mouth) reminds me of someone that I could be good friends. |
| This thread is not going the way OP hoped. |
Everyone except me apparently. Why are you so hung up on me liking her so much? |
|
Things will eventually come out about her and her husband. Once it does become public, they will cease to exist.
I seriously feel bad for the children they have. They are sick twisted people. Maybe not of their own choices. When you make a deal with the devil, the devil demands loyalty. In other words, you buy the ticket you take the ride. |
I'm not the PP you've been arguing with. There are multiple posters on this thread. I'm just sensitive to people referring to women who are famous as "whores." That language is misogynistic and inapplicable to boot. I think you are being unreasonable. If this person was more low key, you would not know who she was. Because she makes an effort to promote her own brand, you dislike her. If you disliked her brand, that would be one thing, but it appears that your issue is that she self-promotes more than you think is acceptable. What is an acceptable level of self-promotion, by your standards? |
|
I’m sick of seeing her face on magazine covers. People magazine is obsessed with showcasing her and Markle.
Otherwise I don’t follow her on social media or wherever else you all are getting overloaded. Headband song? Heard there was one but choose not to seek it out. |
As the other person said, I'm not the pp. You're lashing out at multiple people who don't agree with you. I do think you should look in the mirror and realize you're absolutely hung up on a famous person and have obvious jealousy. You took the time to start a thread about her and thought everyone would agree with you. Personally I don't feel either way about Chrissy Teigen, but she's doing her thing. Any woman out there succeeding is a good thing, especially in these times. Try to find the positive in things, even for one day. I promise it won't hurt you. |
Spill the tea! |
Fine--if you are offended by the word "whore", my apologies. I am not using that word in the way you are taking it. But if that is what the hang-up is, I take it back. But to answer your question, I think she uses her kids and husband too much to enhance her "brand" which, to me, seems to be that of a rich wife who used to be a model. I don't think it's appropriate to but your children in front of the media that much just to get attention. If you want to promote yourself, your music, your acting talent--fine. But not your kids, your political opinions and your luxurious lifestyle. That's just tacky. Same with the Kardashians and all Real Housewives cast members. I put them in the same category. So, it's not just Chrissy Tiegen. |
I'm not the OP. I didn't start the thread. And there are multiple people on here who disagree with you so can we just agree to disagree? |
+1 And she's good friends with the Kardashians which pretty much tells me all I need to know about her. |
I call BS. |
Sure. You might not have started the thread but seem to be going out of your way to prove your point. |