Thanks |
I think, based on personal experience, is that even kids who find math easy, but end with Calculus AB in high school for whatever reason (that's all my school offered, back in the day) should go into any math-based major at a selective college thinking of themselves as learning disabled in math till proven otherwise. They should retake the last high school math course at the college level, go to every lecture and live in the TAs' offices until they know for sure they're on track in math, or they ought to be prepared to slide into some other major. The problem is that so many other kids have gone a year past Calculus BC and are going back and taking the equivalent of Calculus BC, or even calculus AB, so, they're a bunch of ringers. A regular good kid starts out two or three years behind. |
That's not what I meant to say at all. You can do poorly in math and still can go to Stanford if you do well in other things. Life on earth do not involve solely on math. While Elon Musk was probably good in math, I seriously doubt that anne akiko meyers (famous violinist) was as good in math as Elon Musk. If one is not good in math, there is a high probability that he or she will struggle with engineering majors but not with Information Technology. Having good in math has nothing with his or her ability to manage other engineers or scientists. That's my point. |
|
I am terrible at school math. C in Algebra, D in Geometry, C in preCalc, also bad Science, Accounting, Computers anything with calculations.
Went to good college and grad school and ironically my career is Finance and Audit. I am very good real world math. I would not worry. geometry and Calculus are of no use once school is done I went to a top 100 school. 97 Baby!! |
This is so true. I skipped my senior year of high school (long story), so I didn't get to take Calculus. When I took it in college, it was review for everyone else in the class. They were complaining about the pace being too slow, and I was completely lost. |
You know that in reality everything isn’t all sunshine and roses for everyone else, right? Some of those high schoolers who took graduated having taken Calculus Iii or whatever had crappy teachers and/or a crappy curriculum and they might not really have as great a math education as you think. Some of the top private schools aren’t allowing students to place out of many or any college classes at all these days. My daughter is having to retake some of the classes she could have placed out of at other schools because her school likes to be absolutely certain that she learned the material thoroughly in a rigorous class. If you are missing some pieces in your math education it can really affect your understanding and achievement in higher level classes. |
| Probably not |
Hahaha no Are you insane? |
+1 |
No but top 50 is out of the question Probably 100 |
One can get a great education that also yields a solid professional career at one of the top 100 liberal arts colleges, the top 200 or so national universities, and the upper end of regional colleges in your area. Don't fall into the highly selective college or bust trap. Better to focus your energies on helping your kid navigate the world, know themselves, and be an active, engaged student at whatever college they attend. Sometimes being a strong, motivated student at a less selective college can yield better outcomes--personally, professionally, academically--than being the weakest or average in highly selective. |
|
To the pp asking about plumbing school---I think it's smarter to send a kid who is non-academic to a trade school than saddle them with 200K+ debt for a meaningless BA from unknown U.
Different story if undergrad is not an issue cost wise. |
Getting B's in math in a competitive hs is not the same as being non-academic. And it's highly, highly unlikely that one graduates with a B.A. with 200K+ debt (vet school, sure...). The average undergraduate student loan debt is somewhere between 17k-31k for the total 4 years (depending on how you look at the numbers). And trade schools/licensing processes create their own debt loads also. A BA is a gateway to a lot of professional jobs--its not meaningless at all. The data still strongly favor that ANY BA (except from a for profit institution) has a significant net positive impact on life time earning potential. Now if a kid wants to be a plumber, that's great. I have nothing against trade school, but the idea of a "meaningless BA" is pretty much a myth. The BA gives you access to a whole lot of 30-50k entry level jobs regardless of your major or quality of school--most with some health and retirement benefits. Just look at the post-college employment rates for pretty much any university. |
|
^^ There are definitely meaningless BAs. For example:
Modern Dance BA |
Nope, not meaningless in my book. 1) Art forms require physical and mental discipline and dance interpersonal ones. Modern dance has an important 100 year history in multiple countries. 2) BA grads of all majors typically take a suite of other classes (otherwise it would be a BFA--which can also be a viable degree). Modern dance grads--like all BA grads-- will go on to a range of assorted middle class office jobs that require a degree--really the same ones like communications majors, marketing majors, psychology majors and the like--or they may work in arts management. Majors aren't as important as completing the degree. Sure, they aren't on average going to get the same salaries as econ or engineering majors, but they'd generally be better off than getting just dance training without the BA--unless they are performing at a professional level young (then they can wait until they are older to do the BA). And if they are happy and engaged studying dance they will likely find more career opportunities than if they are pissed off and confused studying plumbing or accounting. Sure, if it's my kid I'd encourage them to double-major in a more career-based option too (computer science/robotics and dance are actually a great combo--check out work at MIT media lab). |