SLACS

[Anonymous]

Not sure if the 48% excludes ED applicants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if the 48% excludes ED applicants.

It doesn't.

You can find a listing of just the regular decision yields (calculated by excluding ED admits from the total yield numbers) here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/664603.page

Pomona is at approximately 38%, which is high, but not as high as 4 of the Ivies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if the 48% excludes ED applicants.

It doesn't.

You can find a listing of just the regular decision yields (calculated by excluding ED admits from the total yield numbers) here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/664603.page

Pomona is at approximately 38%, which is high, but not as high as 4 of the Ivies.

And? I don’t get all this hand wringing over yield. It’s so dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if the 48% excludes ED applicants.

It doesn't.

You can find a listing of just the regular decision yields (calculated by excluding ED admits from the total yield numbers) here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/664603.page

Pomona is at approximately 38%, which is high, but not as high as 4 of the Ivies.

And? I don’t get all this hand wringing over yield. It’s so dumb.

+1 Apparently tracking yields is the hobby of some inane poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if the 48% excludes ED applicants.

It doesn't.

You can find a listing of just the regular decision yields (calculated by excluding ED admits from the total yield numbers) here: http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/664603.page

Pomona is at approximately 38%, which is high, but not as high as 4 of the Ivies.

And? I don’t get all this hand wringing over yield. It’s so dumb.

+1 Apparently tracking yields is the hobby of some inane poster.

+2 the obsession is just bizarre. I mean who really cares?