Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Honestly, even more than Trump's election after the Access Hollywood video, Moore winning will confirm to me what I already know about what Americans think of women and their rights to their own body. This isn't a Rep/Dem issue, really, because there are sex predator Dems...and most voters are Independents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

I wonder if they'll push Moore to drop out and Strange to come back in. It's not like Moore was a huge GOP favorite (although they did give him 1$mn for his campaign). Doug Jones is a terrific classy candidate--I really hope he flips that seat blue for Alabamans.

I was wondering the same thing. It's probably too late to get Strange on the ballot, though. Would be really interesting if someone ran a write-in campaign for him.

[Anonymous]

D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

Yeah, whatever Vlad. Roy Moore had some terrible behaviors already known before this scandal broke. If you don't want to believe 3 women who accused him with similar stories on the record, and their mothers, then that's your problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

No evidence Jones knew about it before it broke. WaPo says they were looking to chat with Moore supporters, and heard the rumors. You think WaPo is lying on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

Yeah, whatever Vlad. Roy Moore had some terrible behaviors already known before this scandal broke. If you don't want to believe 3 women who accused him with similar stories on the record, and their mothers, then that's your problem.

How many of the Clinton accusers do you believe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

No evidence Jones knew about it before it broke. WaPo says they were looking to chat with Moore supporters, and heard the rumors. You think WaPo is lying on this?

I'm reading the comments on the al.com website (Alabama.com) and it says this story was "known" in some of the small towns where the women were from. They just needed an aggressive journalist willing to go get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

I wonder if they'll push Moore to drop out and Strange to come back in. It's not like Moore was a huge GOP favorite (although they did give him 1$mn for his campaign). Doug Jones is a terrific classy candidate--I really hope he flips that seat blue for Alabamans.

I was wondering the same thing. It's probably too late to get Strange on the ballot, though. Would be really interesting if someone ran a write-in campaign for him.

Murkowski says if this is true Moore should drop out. Moore already didn't deny that he engaged in fraud for his "moral law charity." His son has just been arrested for the 9th time for drug violations. I'm betting that even in Alabama this will be the straw that breaks the camel's back, especially since Jones is a really good Democratic candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:D here, something fishy about this story. I've a feeling it may backfire on Jones.

Because Jones, what, assaulted these women himself? Got the Washington Post to falsify a story? Paid the women to make up a story against Moore? Really, please explain your conspiracy theory here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

I wonder if they'll push Moore to drop out and Strange to come back in. It's not like Moore was a huge GOP favorite (although they did give him 1$mn for his campaign). Doug Jones is a terrific classy candidate--I really hope he flips that seat blue for Alabamans.

I was wondering the same thing. It's probably too late to get Strange on the ballot, though. Would be really interesting if someone ran a write-in campaign for him.

It is too late. And, that is why they held off on this story. Smells really fishy to me.

[Anonymous]

So if Moore drops out, does the GOP put in Strange? Or is that too risky? Do they have any alternatives? Will Breitbart rebel? Will the Moore supporters still go to the polls?

[Anonymous]

As of Thursday, Moore led the RealClearPolitics average of recent polls by a 6 point margin. The two most recent polls had Moore up by 11, but the third most-recent, from Fox News, showed the race tied.
That smaller-than-usual margin has given Democrats some hope that the race could be competitive. But the party had so far bucked calls to flood the state with resources, arguing that Jones will be better off with conservative voters if Washington stays on the sideline.

Democrats need to go after this seat with all that they're worth. If they can't beat someone as flawed as Roy Moore with a candidate as good as Doug Jones, when can they win in the deep south?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

I wonder if they'll push Moore to drop out and Strange to come back in. It's not like Moore was a huge GOP favorite (although they did give him 1$mn for his campaign). Doug Jones is a terrific classy candidate--I really hope he flips that seat blue for Alabamans.

I was wondering the same thing. It's probably too late to get Strange on the ballot, though. Would be really interesting if someone ran a write-in campaign for him.

It is too late. And, that is why they held off on this story. Smells really fishy to me.

Suppose its true, WaPo knew months ago, but didn't publish till now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sens Perdue and Murkowski with the right response.

Why is anyone on this forum defending Moore?

I wonder if they'll push Moore to drop out and Strange to come back in. It's not like Moore was a huge GOP favorite (although they did give him 1$mn for his campaign). Doug Jones is a terrific classy candidate--I really hope he flips that seat blue for Alabamans.

I was wondering the same thing. It's probably too late to get Strange on the ballot, though. Would be really interesting if someone ran a write-in campaign for him.

It is too late. And, that is why they held off on this story. Smells really fishy to me.

It takes months of research, interviews, editing, and fact checking to publish that story by WaPo. Literally, many hundreds, and maybe thousands, of man hours. Plus, they need to get the the WaPo lawyers to clear it.

I guarantee that they have been working on the story since the early summer.

[Anonymous]

I mean, even McConnell is on the right side of this.