Richard Spencer's gym membership was revoked after a Georgetown professor confronted him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

Probably because most of the members aren't offended by the Prof. like they are by Spencer. I'm guessing that many were glad that Prof. spoke up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

Probably because most of the members aren't offended by the Prof. like they are by Spencer. I'm guessing that many were glad that Prof. spoke up.

A good business decision given their membership profile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

I don't read AltRight stuff. I read Chronicles Magazine, The American Conservative, The American Interest, The Imaginitive Conservative, and The Orthosphere

Add one or two left leaning sources. To balance. NPR? Think and compare the views of different sources. Right now you sound like a parrot without a fully formed frontal lobe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/510533/rebranding-white-nationalism-inside-the-alt-right/

And this

http://thepointnews.com/2017/03/steve-bannon-from-rebranding-white-nationalism-to-advising-the-president

Perhaps this can help you understand the concern over normalizing people like Spencer and even Bannon

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2016/12/7/13802640/white-nationalists-alt-right-racism-bannon-spencer-trump

The problem with low brow teen semi intellectuals is that they are afraid of challenging their beliefs. College will be tough.

[Anonymous]

Free speech doesn't mean what you think it means in liberal America.

The thought police determine what positions you can publicly espouse. If you say something they don't agree with, you should be banished to the land west of I-81 and east of I-5.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free speech doesn't mean what you think it means in liberal America.

The thought police determine what positions you can publicly espouse. If you say something they don't agree with, you should be banished to the land west of I-81 and east of I-5.

Free speech doesn't mean other people have to tolerate being in the same room with your hate speech. No one is preventing Spencer from speaking what's in his ugly mind and heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free speech doesn't mean what you think it means in liberal America.

The thought police determine what positions you can publicly espouse. If you say something they don't agree with, you should be banished to the land west of I-81 and east of I-5.

“Our dream is a new society, an ethno-state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans. It would be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration of Independence."

– Quoted by Vice, October 2013

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the story about this in the WaPo. I agree that the professor should have been kicked out, too -- you shouldn't yell at patrons. That said, a private gym has the right to exclude Nazis if they want to.

The gym certainly has the right to do it. I just don't understand why they did it. Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

A girl can dream...

I'm with you! I would love separate gyms, restaurants, airlines, schools, grocery stores, etc from idiot Republicans/Right Wingers. Talk about utopia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

I don't read AltRight stuff. I read Chronicles Magazine, The American Conservative, The American Interest, The Imaginitive Conservative, and The Orthosphere

Add one or two left leaning sources. To balance. NPR? Think and compare the views of different sources. Right now you sound like a parrot without a fully formed frontal lobe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/510533/rebranding-white-nationalism-inside-the-alt-right/

And this

http://thepointnews.com/2017/03/steve-bannon-from-rebranding-white-nationalism-to-advising-the-president

Perhaps this can help you understand the concern over normalizing people like Spencer and even Bannon

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2016/12/7/13802640/white-nationalists-alt-right-racism-bannon-spencer-trump

The problem with low brow teen semi intellectuals is that they are afraid of challenging their beliefs. College will be tough.

Pales here
I do occasionally look at NPR, and the Atlantic publishes some interesting stuff. I was just giving you guys an idea of what I read regularly. I'll certainly get my views challenged at St. John's, but all of the classes are discussion based. No indoctrination

[Anonymous]

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the story about this in the WaPo. I agree that the professor should have been kicked out, too -- you shouldn't yell at patrons. That said, a private gym has the right to exclude Nazis if they want to.

The gym certainly has the right to do it. I just don't understand why they did it. Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

I'm okay with this scenario

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free speech doesn't mean what you think it means in liberal America.

The thought police determine what positions you can publicly espouse. If you say something they don't agree with, you should be banished to the land west of I-81 and east of I-5.

Who is policing Spencer's thoughts? His personal, private thoughts are his right - but others have the right to counter them, especially when your thoughts and public actions threaten them.

Furthermore, "freedom of speech" does not mean freedom from consequences. There are limits on Freedom of Speech" for the protections of fellow Americans - ie, hate speech.

It's sad how many Americans don't understand their own country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the story about this in the WaPo. I agree that the professor should have been kicked out, too -- you shouldn't yell at patrons. That said, a private gym has the right to exclude Nazis if they want to.

The gym certainly has the right to do it. I just don't understand why they did it. Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

I'm okay with this scenario

Maybe on an island in the South Pacific. Their own colony

[Anonymous]

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, Richard Spencer's views are reprehensible. Period.

It does seem that Fair has a problem with the first amendment:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/01/06/muslim-woman-who-voted-for-trump-asks-georgetown-to-intervene-over-professors-hateful-vulgar-messages/?utm_term=.da0086df2c81

They are reprehensible, but that doesn't matter. I don't care what he belives. As long as he's not hurting anyone or insulting people at the gym, why should his membership be revoked?

Read the article. These two at the same gym is bad news. I feel for the management.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A racial separatist got separated. There is irony in that.

Also ironic that he was judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin.

[Anonymous]

Oh lord this idiot woman Fair at it again. She is such an absolute vomit. She is known for vile attacks on anyone who isn't an insane leftist. If you want to see what I mean, look up her attack on Asra Nomani, another Georgetown professor and former Muslim who dared criticize Islam. As a Georgetown alumni, they will never get a donation from me until they stop pandering to this crap

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A racial separatist got separated. There is irony in that.

Also ironic that he was judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin.

So what did he do at that gym to "be judged by the content of his character" How about we judge those BLM barbarians who trash cities by the content of their character?