Sexism is the sole reason Hillary lost

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And that is a fact no one can dispute.

This exemplifies the mentality of the classic Hillary devotee. They just arrogantly assert supposed facts with no substantiation, and then when everybody doesn't immediately see their mental and moral superiority and get on board, they dismiss them as bigots.

Exactly. I guarantee you that if Obama lost in 2012, it would have been blamed on racism. (Never mind that he had already won in 2008.) Rather than look inward to analyze why voters rejected Hillary and a continuation of failed liberal policies, these spoiled losers blame everything and everyone else. It's Comey's fault! She has a vagina! The people are racists! The hard fact is that Hillary was a fatally flawed nominee (she's still under FBI investigation for public corruption and grossly mishandled classified information in favor of her own self-interests) who espouses policies that were rejected.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/11/09/donald-trumps-win-wasnt-about-racism/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Top5&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTURNek4yTTVZek5oWVROayIsInQiOiJnYUpGRmhxVXJReVwvakVJVVQ0SnVqTERVZHZJZkMxSlExSG15Yys5azdMMEttU0Y2Q0tFaWVZOG81WHd1NGpLVzJER21jQ2RMV252UjRtYjJnYUhWeWt4R3FmYzd3dzgzQWhqMENQT1FGQjg9In0%3D

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I could have supported Elizabeth Dole in her day. Someone like that.
I wonder if the strong Hilary supporters would vote for a conservative/Republican woman?
Probably not.

Of course they wouldn’t. But, it wouldn’t be because of sexism, mind you. It is only sexism when it is a Democrat running.

No one paid attention to me unthread when I said that Sarah Palin suffered from the same bias. Read Notes from a Cracked Ceiling to see how EVEN Republican women have suffered from bias in their campaigns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Think of how freaking tough this woman hadto be to run the DC gauntlet the last 20+ years. She easily has to be 3x ballsier, tougher and braver than the men to get where she has.

I'm done arguing about how bad a candidate hillary was, how her machinations with the DNC lost her the election, how its not all about sexism.

Here's the thing - she ran the DC gauntlet but let's not pretend she earned it. She became First Lady on the strength of her husband's platform, she was given the Senate seat after the long-standing female NY Rep was told to stand down post-Clinton scandal, she became Secretary of State after loosing the election to Barack Obama....

She didn't spend 20 years fighting for her candidacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And that is a fact no one can dispute.

This exemplifies the mentality of the classic Hillary devotee. They just arrogantly assert supposed facts with no substantiation, and then when everybody doesn't immediately see their mental and moral superiority and get on board, they dismiss them as bigots.

People are looking for substantive commentary from Trump supporters on the threads about the Rust Belt and Veteran's Day. Rather than being a master necromancer with these very tired tropes, please tell us more about the positive changes your side will bring.

[Anonymous]

Clinton ran a sexist campaign. All she talked about was I am a woman, you must vote for me because I am a women and think about your daughters(not your sons). Let's face it, she had the op and other neofeminst the monument she announced she was running. She should have tried to expand her base to other genders. She did not and lost.
It would be like if Obama had run a black power campaign. You need to be inclusive, not exclusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I could have supported Elizabeth Dole in her day. Someone like that.
I wonder if the strong Hilary supporters would vote for a conservative/Republican woman?
Probably not.

Depends what her policies were. On the present, neo Nazi, sexist, every other kind of bad person platform of the Republican Party, no. A sensible one dem the seventies? Quite possibly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clinton ran a sexist campaign. All she talked about was I am a woman, you must vote for me because I am a women and think about your daughters(not your sons). Let's face it, she had the op and other neofeminst the monument she announced she was running. She should have tried to expand her base to other genders. She did not and lost.
It would be like if Obama had run a black power campaign. You need to be inclusive, not exclusive.

I believe it was Madeline Albright (could be wrong) who said there was a special place in hell for women who didn't vote for the woman candidate. Gender card much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clinton ran a sexist campaign. All she talked about was I am a woman, you must vote for me because I am a women and think about your daughters(not your sons). Let's face it, she had the op and other neofeminst the monument she announced she was running. She should have tried to expand her base to other genders. She did not and lost.
It would be like if Obama had run a black power campaign. You need to be inclusive, not exclusive.

No, she didn't. God, you cons can't get through a few moments without lying baldly. Conservative projection!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton ran a sexist campaign. All she talked about was I am a woman, you must vote for me because I am a women and think about your daughters(not your sons). Let's face it, she had the op and other neofeminst the monument she announced she was running. She should have tried to expand her base to other genders. She did not and lost.
It would be like if Obama had run a black power campaign. You need to be inclusive, not exclusive.

I believe it was Madeline Albright (could be wrong) who said there was a special place in hell for women who didn't vote for the woman candidate. Gender card much?

1. Get the quote right. Special place in hell for women who don't support other women.
2. Madeleine Albright and Hillary are not the same person. Shall we use some of the quotes Nazis made in support of Trump's campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton ran a sexist campaign. All she talked about was I am a woman, you must vote for me because I am a women and think about your daughters(not your sons). Let's face it, she had the op and other neofeminst the monument she announced she was running. She should have tried to expand her base to other genders. She did not and lost.
It would be like if Obama had run a black power campaign. You need to be inclusive, not exclusive.

No, she didn't. God, you cons can't get through a few moments without lying baldly. Conservative projection!

I'm not the PP and I was reluctant voter for Hillary. I agree the fuck with them. I can't tell you how irritating and short-sighted it was that this candidacy became about the historic win instead of the fight to be won. They were popping champagne on the plane in the days before for god's sake!

The suffragette symbolism was overwhelming and she embraced it heartily. I mean I loved that the fact that she was a woman. I loved the fact that she was running for President. But falling into the trap that I should take that gender-power message, run with it, and ignore my obligations to campaign like my life depended on it was a dumb move. A mistake that wasn't made in '08 and '12.

She not only lost her own demographic because of that but the 10,000,000 votes Obama gained in his candidacy.