Turning off the lights at the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

[Anonymous]

Lights out time, G-boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

It is funny how the democrats have flipped on this. Weren't they saying as well how dumb anyone was for thinking the election was rigged in the first place? Now it's rigged against Clinton? ROFLMAO right there with you.

Yep..they openly mocked Republicans for even suggesting an election could be rigged. My, how their tune has changed. Now the FBI doing their job is rigging the election.

Yeah, like the way Republicans' tunes have changed with respect to Putin and the Russians. We are all friends now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

This proves nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

Yes, the Bureau can make a recommendation that charges be brought but DOJ ultimately is vested with the prosecutorial discretion whether to seek a grand jury indictment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems very off that they made two releases so close to the election. The election is definitely rigged against Clinton. The FBI seems to be working with the alt-right media to cheat Clinton.

Perhaps they know more than we do about her crooked antics.

What do you expect from a bunch of old boys. They hate HRC because she is not a man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

Really? You are an agent who just phoned up a prosecutor with a recommendation to prosecute without prior investigation that involved the prosecutor, without your supervisor talking to the prosecutor's supervisor about the case, without layers of internal memos drafted regarding the investigation? That's amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

The AG because of a private meeting with Bill Clinton has recused herself and let FBI make recommendations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

The AG because of a private meeting with Bill Clinton has recused herself and let FBI make recommendations.

There are lots of other steps. Like a trial for instance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

Really? You are an agent who just phoned up a prosecutor with a recommendation to prosecute without prior investigation that involved the prosecutor, without your supervisor talking to the prosecutor's supervisor about the case, without layers of internal memos drafted regarding the investigation? That's amazing.

Thank you. It does not happen. No way the PP is an agent. Probably an analyst or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Thank you. It does not happen. No way the PP is an agent. Probably an analyst or something.

NP. I am highly amused at the Trump supporters who have come on here and posed as various people over the months - lawyers, agents, etc., - as though no one here will know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

Really? You are an agent who just phoned up a prosecutor with a recommendation to prosecute without prior investigation that involved the prosecutor, without your supervisor talking to the prosecutor's supervisor about the case, without layers of internal memos drafted regarding the investigation? That's amazing.

Did I say that? Do you think that's how the Clinton case was handled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ROFLMAO! A month ago the FBI was straight-shooting & non-partisan when it was ordered to stop investigating Clinton. Now, it needs to be broken up and is a centerpiece to partisan politics, because it gained a conscious and is completing what it should have doing the entire time.


BTW, Bernie supporters, do you agree with PP above who states the election is rigged against Clinton?

Hmmm, I think there were many folks who were troubled by Comey's break from FBI protocol last summer in making a public announcement.

It's not the FBI Agents or Comey. It's *hem others in the DOJ. Sounds to me like the FBI is doing everything they can to tell the American people that Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Comey literally laid out the case against her in his first announcement. I think it was pretty clear his hands were tied. He gave the American people too much credit by assuming they could read between the lines.

Just my opinion. I can't stand either candidate, so for me it doesn't matter. I'm just sitting back and watching.

That sounds to me like a witch hunt. Either there's something there to indict or there isn't. They don't get to say, nothing to investigate but hint hint there is.

They have to have someone willing to prosecute. Without a prosecutor, it doesn't matter how much evidence they find.

If they had recommended an indictment, THAT would have been saying everything they could say about Hillary being a criminal. And Lynch was already on the record as saying she would accept the FBI's recommendation, so not prosecuting would be politically untenable.

And that might make sense - but only to someone who doesn't understand that that's not the way the FBI works. They don't make "recommendations". That's why those of us who understand the FBI know that something is off. The FBI conducts an investigation and turns the material over to a federal prosecutor. The end. It's up to the prosecutor to decide what to do with it. The problem is most people watch too many television crime dramas and don't understand this.

I've given cases to DOJ with a recommendation, so don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about.

The AG because of a private meeting with Bill Clinton has recused herself and let FBI make recommendations.

And that's where this case really got messed up.

And once again, it's Hillary paying the price for Bill's screw-up. I wonder if he's ever considered getting "I'm sorry honey" tattooed on his forehead.