And yet somehow, generations of kids (including probably most people on DCUM) managed to develop the skills to do homework when homework actually became important to learning round about jr high ... drilling a skill far before a child is ready for it or needs it does not necessarily help. |
I do cook dinner for my family but there are also days when we have eaten dinner at my mother's nursing home, or we ate sandwiches in the car on the way to a sibling's soccer practice after daycare, or we ate dinner at "family night at church", or we cooked a recipe that has been in our family for generations and involves quantities like "a pinch" rather than a fraction. The above homework assumes that every child has the same experiences -- like families that prepare dinner with recipes, or playing outside with a parent after school. In my experiences, the teachers who think it is OK to dictate to families like that post above, are the same teachers who use homework as a tool for deciding which families are "invested in their child's education" and for reducing their effort and sense of efficacy when I comes to helping kids. |
I’m not sure the microbial life topic is a good one for MS. But, it gave me a chuckle. Debating is a great skill. It forces one to look at a topic from all perspectives. Homework is a great debate topic since there are positives and negatives on both sides. There are a lot of people who could benefit from looking at topics from multiple perspectives. |
It actually hurts. I agree with you. |
I agree as well. That is why this body of research is useless. Because many teachers do give inappropriate homework. But homework does not have to be inappropriate and could be at the child's level to reinforce learning and cultivate good study habit. |
I agree. I talk to my child about math a lot. But the times when we were required to go outside and count the number of red leaves, we made those up. I consider those bad homework. It is okay they do that at school. I would have hated those activities as a child but haven since given up on making learning math more abstract for my child at this stage. The constructivism agenda in education is too prevalent to battle. |
|
Growing up, I rarely had homework in elementary school. If we had extra assignments I would try to finish them during the day. Occasionally I had a project or something lighter that would take 20 minutes or so. My parents, who were from another country, were always saying "where is your homework??" "where is your homework??" and I would say "I did it at school" or "I don't have any!" They could barely believe me.
I think this was perfect. I had a lot of time for play and being creative. I built cities out of legos, had dramas with my barbies. I got to play outside with neighborhood kids. I even wrote books to amuse myself. I was able to go to a top college and law school. It's pretty clear that this homework thing is cyclical. People demand more homework for a few years, then there is a backlash, and then there is a backlash from no homework, and on and on. I wish people would just go with quantitative evidence, which shows that a ton of homework is not going to help elementary schoolers. |
Debate is a great activity. I was iffy on it at first, but have been won over. Even if a middle school debate is the equivalent of a 4th grade strings concert to observe. Public speaking, poise, thinking on your feet, learning to construct and rebut arguments, working as a member of a team. There's a lot of good skills there. Which is why, back to the actual topic,it would be nice if more homework, even in middle to upper ES, involved things like preparing for a class debate on homework, or cell phones, or uniforms, rather than memorizing spelling lists. Some amount of really challenging substantive work doesn't bother me. Inane busywork drives me nuts. |
not THAT is a total waste of class time. |
Actually, spelling lists themselves are a total waste of time. The supposed goal of spelling lists and spelling tests are to help kids learn to spell words correctly. Many do quite well for the spelling test itself. As a career teacher, I used to have kids do beautifully on their spelling tests only to continually misspell the words they supposedly “learned” during their writing. What I learned about teaching spelling is that words kids needed to learn were words they used repeatedly in their writing. So, students had different words they were learning. And, how did they learn them? By keeping these words in their hand made “dictionaries” and checking their own work. This required work on my part, but my students were excellent spellers and by the end of the year, they were able to write more quickly and with less effort because their writing vocabulary had grown. Word study is also beneficial to students - learning word patterns and such. |
PP here, I was being snarky - the more play time & moving around the better! |
Mine absolutely did. When we were young we did our homework in the kitchen while my mother made dinner so she could answer questions. When we got older we did it in our rooms. My dad read my reports and helped me with science projects until I was in HS. |
Psssst. Middle school grades don't matter. You've been suckered into believing they do but they really don't. They disappear when your child goes to high school and no college admissions office will ever see them. A student in middle school can do only the helpful, meaningful work and be just fine skipping the rest. |
+1 You don't learn to do homework when it's appropriate by doing a bunch of it when it's not. I'm okay with sending a list of spelling words home each week on Monday to practice for a test on Friday. Or the multiplication tables. Or reading for 20 minutes a night. But worksheets for preschoolers? Stupid. I didn't have homework until third grade at the earliest, aside from little things like "look for three red things in your house" or whatever. |
Yeah. It turns out that physical play and free exploration are critical for brain development. The idea that recess is a luxury is so incredibly messed up. |