PP here. I am from Detroit actually. And I will tell you that Coleman Young did not start that city on the road to financial ruin. The Detroit Free Press publiched a series of articles that analyzed Detroit's financial issues going back decades. Many of the problems in Detroit that came to roost in the bankruptcy were actually created by the tax and spend policies of Young's White predecessors. If you are interested and not just blowing smoke, I will post the link. But here is the problem I have with your statement. It is easy to analyze a problem looking back. Monday morning quarterbacks have the easiest jobs. But let me play Devil's advocate. You are are elected mayor and you are faced with a floundering city - your residents are fleeing to Maryland and Virginia and you have no concrete commercial or residential tax base. Besides that, the Height restricts taxable density, your major "industry" is the Fed Goverment, which you cannot tax. But yet you have to do something.... I see what they were trying to do and, TBH, the biggest fallacy in the plan was the most of the new hires did not live in the District - so their contribution to the tax base was minimal. I aid it was not a viable long term solution, but action was necessary at the time. |
|
Part of the problem is that Barry created a middle class that basically moved to Ward 9 (PG County) as soon as it could. So while it benefited some people, the District ultimately didn't reap those rewards.
|
That's a very interesting observation. |
Interesting, but not that novel. Most folks who pay attention to local politics understand this. FWIW, such practices are not limited to DC. I know some NYC firefighters and police officers who live two hours o/w from the city. |