Manager maybe? |
the mortgage interest deduction helps us - on a AGI of 73K. I really don't think you would consider that an income in the higher range for this area..... we'll be okay with that deduction but it wouldn't be as easy as for some. |
I mean "without" |
How are you calculating 30%? With a taxable income (not including any deductions at all) of 340,000, total federal income tax due would be ~88,000 or an effective tax rate of 26% for a married couple. Assuming deductions of 40K for mortgage interest, property tax, personal deductions, etc., effective tax rate goes down to 22% |
No, it doesn't. You can make the case for converting the mortgage interest deduction to a credit, which would help people lower down the income ladder. But with interest rates as low as they are and the standard deduction as high as it currently is, it really doesn't help anyone in the middle class who pays less than $200,000 for a home (which is the norm in most of the country). All economists will tell you the benefits of the mortgage interest deduction disproportionately benefit those with higher incomes. Most middle-class taxpayers don't even itemize. So, you're factually incorrect. |
| I'm the $132k/9.49% poster. Mortgage interest, state and local property tax deductions, 2 kids, modest charitable donations -- these are key to reducing our rate. I'm all for reducing or taking away the mortgage deduction for mortgages above a certain amount and for second homes, boats, etc. Such a change would not affect us. |
AGI of $73,000 isn't middle class. Not by ordinary standards in the country. The median income is in the low 50s. for a household. If you made $73,000 in, say, Columbus and paid $175,000 for your house, borrowing $150,000 at 4%, you'd pay a little over $710 a month in interest charges. Over the course of the year, you'd pay $8,400 or so. That's $4,000 beneath the standard deduction $12,400. I suppose you could add whatever state income and property taxes to the mix, plus charitable deductions. Say you put together another $6,000 in deductions between those items. Now you have $14,400 to itemize. You're in the 15% bracket at that point, so the tax savings there for itemizing is $300. It's not nothing, but hardly catastrophic. Now say you make $273,000 in DC. And you pay $975,000 for your house, borrowing $750,000 at 4%. Your monthly interest charges at first would be nearly $3,600, or $43,200 for the year. Throw on another $10,000 for property tax, another $10,000 for state income tax, and $5,000 for charitable donations (about 2% of income, which is fairly typical). Now you have itemized deductions of $68,200. Back out the value of the standard deduction and you have roughly $56,000 in additional deductions. You're in the the 33% tax bracket, so that's a tax savings of $18,400 or so. That's the difference. Remember: Only a third of Americans itemize their deductions. And only 2/3 of homeowners have any sort of mortgage at all. The rest own their home outright. |
|
AGI - $352k
ETR - 21.15% |
Please note that is why I said "for this area". I also said we would be fine without the deduction. I never said catastrophic. |
|
AGI: 125K
Federal Tax: 7K ETR: 5.6% We have 5 exemptions and 3 dependents. But we also paid $11K in property taxes, $3K in charity, and $18K in mortgage interest. |
|
AGI: $88k
Federal Tax: $2,100 ETR: 2.4% Besides mortgage interest, we own several rental properties. While cash flow positive, depreciation accounts for a significant loss. |
|
AGI: 260K
Federal Tax: 66k ETR: 28.5% |
How is this possible? |
$318K adjusted gross income $63K in taxes owed 19.8% effective tax rate |
250k+ HHI, and I am with you. |