Child support question - reduction or stays the same with new child claim?

Anonymous
Why is he a loser? He takes care of the kid he KNOWS is his. Sounds to me like there is a lot of questions about the other kid and sounds like that kid's mother is a nutcase.
Why would he want to bring that kind of drama into his life and into his first child's life? Why would his first child's mother want that in her life as well?

So he has to support the second child financially. Okay fine. It's the law, it's what he should do. As for the relationship with that child? That's up to him. Yeah it sucks but if that child's mother wasn't so crazy with all these men, maybe it would be a different story and everyone could get along. Lets just say he comes around and mom#1 decides to be civil. Mom#2 is probably one of these women that keep bringnig the drama, I need this and that and the money and time with her kid won't be enough. Setting this guy and his first kid and first kid's mom up for a lifetime of bs....
Don't blame him one bit! Drama free and quiet life for himself and the child he knows is his - why would he want to disrupt that?
Anonymous
Well, ok
According to you he is a saint
Question remains, how will he be able to convince the mammas that that is what he is
Anonymous
A saint that allows his child (until proven other wise) to suffer. If the mother of Baby#2 is a nut and drama filled why would any real man allow her to not only raise his seed but not participate in the child's life. How do you stand by and just watch . . . oh that's right the child can suffer so that the man has no drama.
Anonymous
Shame shame on the woman
Hush hush for the man
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:A saint that allows his child (until proven other wise) to suffer. If the mother of Baby#2 is a nut and drama filled why would any real man allow her to not only raise his seed but not participate in the child's life. How do you stand by and just watch . . . oh that's right the child can suffer so that the man has no drama.


He could try and fight for custody but we all know how that works out. He gets joint custody, at best, still pays support, still deals with the nutty drama queen,
and the kid still gets raised by the nutty drama queen. So it's damned if you do, damned if you don't in this case. No wonder he wants nothing to do with her,
maybe if mother of baby#2 acted like an adult and not some crazy stalker things would be a LOT different...
Anonymous
The drama is the consequence of unprotected sex. The child is an innocent consequence and should not be punished to have a drama queen as his only parent. Better to have a drama queen and a father than just DRAMA MAMA and a father that won't bother.
Anonymous
And we say the other mama is a drama queen because the one mama says so
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And we say the other mama is a drama queen because the one mama says so


Amen. Me thinks the nutcase claim doest protest too much.

Seen a mirror, hon?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why is he a loser? He takes care of the kid he KNOWS is his. Sounds to me like there is a lot of questions about the other kid and sounds like that kid's mother is a nutcase.
Why would he want to bring that kind of drama into his life and into his first child's life? Why would his first child's mother want that in her life as well?

So he has to support the second child financially. Okay fine. It's the law, it's what he should do. As for the relationship with that child? That's up to him. Yeah it sucks but if that child's mother wasn't so crazy with all these men, maybe it would be a different story and everyone could get along. Lets just say he comes around and mom#1 decides to be civil. Mom#2 is probably one of these women that keep bringnig the drama, I need this and that and the money and time with her kid won't be enough. Setting this guy and his first kid and first kid's mom up for a lifetime of bs....
Don't blame him one bit! Drama free and quiet life for himself and the child he knows is his - why would he want to disrupt that?


Mom one got knocked up. Locked him down but NO marriage. He put his penis into another person. She knows this and that there is a possibility he created another person that he is not taking care of. Sounds to me like momma 1 is an over controlling nutcase that can't satisfy "her man" enough that he doesn't stray. Heck he wouldn't even marry her and she had his " legitimate" ok technically 1st ILLEGITIMATE child.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is he a loser? He takes care of the kid he KNOWS is his. Sounds to me like there is a lot of questions about the other kid and sounds like that kid's mother is a nutcase.
Why would he want to bring that kind of drama into his life and into his first child's life? Why would his first child's mother want that in her life as well?

So he has to support the second child financially. Okay fine. It's the law, it's what he should do. As for the relationship with that child? That's up to him. Yeah it sucks but if that child's mother wasn't so crazy with all these men, maybe it would be a different story and everyone could get along. Lets just say he comes around and mom#1 decides to be civil. Mom#2 is probably one of these women that keep bringnig the drama, I need this and that and the money and time with her kid won't be enough. Setting this guy and his first kid and first kid's mom up for a lifetime of bs....
Don't blame him one bit! Drama free and quiet life for himself and the child he knows is his - why would he want to disrupt that?


Mom one got knocked up. Locked him down but NO marriage. He put his penis into another person. She knows this and that there is a possibility he created another person that he is not taking care of. Sounds to me like momma 1 is an over controlling nutcase that can't satisfy "her man" enough that he doesn't stray. Heck he wouldn't even marry her and she had his " legitimate" ok technically 1st ILLEGITIMATE child.

Oh snap
Anonymous
I can't stand your pro life, every child is not a mistake bullshi*. You cannot force anyone to be a parent nor make someone love someone. MISTAKES happen. Its like it takes two to tango, the dad says I want an abortion but the mom is like no, i wont I am pro life. Why does she get to make the decision for both of them especially in situations where a condom breaks or birth control fails? Umm she chose single handedly to keep the baby so she should be forced to take care of that child on her own. You guys are idiots for attacking this woman who was only concerned about her portion of the child support not to get criticized for her husband's actions. Like she said she can't force her husband to be there for his child physically. NO one can not even a damn judge can force him to love and spend time with the accident. GET OVER YOURSELF DAMN HIPPIES WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO JUDGE HIM OR HER
Anonymous
You're a retard, PP. It does take two. You make the decision when you decide to have sex. Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I can't stand your pro life, every child is not a mistake bullshi*. You cannot force anyone to be a parent nor make someone love someone. MISTAKES happen. Its like it takes two to tango, the dad says I want an abortion but the mom is like no, i wont I am pro life. Why does she get to make the decision for both of them especially in situations where a condom breaks or birth control fails? Umm she chose single handedly to keep the baby so she should be forced to take care of that child on her own. You guys are idiots for attacking this woman who was only concerned about her portion of the child support not to get criticized for her husband's actions. Like she said she can't force her husband to be there for his child physically. NO one can not even a damn judge can force him to love and spend time with the accident. GET OVER YOURSELF DAMN HIPPIES WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO JUDGE HIM OR HER


He choose to put his penis in! Shocking news IF YOU DONT HAVE SEX YOU CANNOT GET A PERSON PREGNANT- problem solved
Anonymous
Why does OP have a child support order in place? They broke up, but surely her BF, who's a "man" willingly paid for the care of his child while they were broken up, right?

Then why would you need to file for CS?
post reply Forum Index » Parenting -- Special Concerns
Message Quick Reply
Go to: