Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-is an idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/statements/2016/07/24/hillary-clinton-statement-on-the-resignation-of-democratic-national-committee-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz/


“I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership.

There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”

"Honorary chair" are the key words. It is a b-s position

Did you read HRC's full statement? It may or may not be a b-s position, but Debbie shouldn't be rewarded for looking right into the cameras and stating that the DNC was impartial, unbiased, not working for just one candidate, etc. Those were lies, so why does Hillary want her around? Sanders' supporters should be outraged.

I agree with every word you say but Hillary's motivation is to get DWS supporting her in FL - there are segments of the electorate in FL who love DWS, hard as it may be to believe.

What group loves a liar?

Well considering that Floridians also elected Rick Scott (twice!), it's hard to understand exactly what they're thinking, but it doesn't appear to follow common sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/statements/2016/07/24/hillary-clinton-statement-on-the-resignation-of-democratic-national-committee-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz/


“I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership.

There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”

"Honorary chair" are the key words. It is a b-s position

Did you read HRC's full statement? It may or may not be a b-s position, but Debbie shouldn't be rewarded for looking right into the cameras and stating that the DNC was impartial, unbiased, not working for just one candidate, etc. Those were lies, so why does Hillary want her around? Sanders' supporters should be outraged.

I agree with every word you say but Hillary's motivation is to get DWS supporting her in FL - there are segments of the electorate in FL who love DWS, hard as it may be to believe.

What group loves a liar?

Well considering that Floridians also elected Rick Scott (twice!), it's hard to understand exactly what they're thinking, but it doesn't appear to follow common sense.

DWS sure isn't popular among the Florida delegation. She was booed bigtime at this morning's breakfast session.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-conventions/wasserman-schultz-gets-booed-florida-convention-breakfast-n616161

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
DWS sure isn't popular among the Florida delegation. She was booed bigtime at this morning's breakfast session.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-conventions/wasserman-schultz-gets-booed-florida-convention-breakfast-n616161

She really is not at all an appealing person even without all this email business and she is a liar - no surprise that she and Hillary are friends.

[Anonymous]

The DNC should have been loyal to HRC because she is a Democrat. Bernie was an interloper and the DNC owed him zero.

He and his supporters can behave as adults or be spoiled, petulant a..holes and vote for DJT, 3rd party or stay home. If they Do this then the election will then be decided in the House of Representatives and Trump will win. Cutting off your nose to spite your face is beyond stupid.

Also, why isn't there outrage over Trump and Roger Ailes as a paid, or unpaid, advisor?

[Anonymous]

She won't be opening the DNC tonight

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/index.html?adkey=bn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She won't be opening the DNC tonight

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/index.html?adkey=bn

Very disappointing. No reason to watch tonight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She won't be opening the DNC tonight

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/index.html?adkey=bn

If hope to unify the party this week, they need to send her home.

She was a polarizing figure to begin with, but after the leaks her continued presence is rubbing salt in a wound.

[Anonymous]

Hilary likes her and has to show support for her because they are two pees in a pod - both a liars, both are climbers, both are power hungry, and both have tons of dirty laundry.

[Anonymous]

boooooed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She won't be opening the DNC tonight

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/index.html?adkey=bn

If hope to unify the party this week, they need to send her home.

She was a polarizing figure to begin with, but after the leaks her continued presence is rubbing salt in a wound.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/statements/2016/07/24/hillary-clinton-statement-on-the-resignation-of-democratic-national-committee-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz/


“I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership.

There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”

"Honorary chair" are the key words. It is a b-s position

She shouldn't be honored for anything, whether it's a ceremonial position or not. Clinton should be distancing herself from all of this. This is disappointing

Instead, they're BFs.

[Anonymous]

And yet, D W-S made CRS allow telework for its staff as a condition of getting its budget approved. Something for which I, for one, will be eternally grateful. She is indeed family and work-life balance friendly.