Reed for math/physics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
That's one reason students interested in these topics might look at places like Pomona College, where faculty such as Cyril Creque-Sarbinowski are actively working on questions that connect cosmology directly to particle physics.

Or go to MIT, JHU, or UW, where Creque-Sarbinowski learned about that stuff and worked at research labs.

(Also, Creque-Sarbinowski isn't even at Pomona yet.)

https://cyril-creque.github.io/

It seems pretty self evident that this is a thread about an LAC though. I’d posit there’s a lot more overlap between Reed and Pomona’s application pool than MIT and Reed

Also it seems Creque-Sarbinowski was just a post doc at UW and didn’t receive his education there. Agreed that creque sarbinowki appears to be joining Pomona in the fall- lucky for those students

[Anonymous]

To clarify a bit, someone had asked about particle physics in particular, so I treated it as its own subfield rather than as a branch of cosmology. Obviously, some particular physicists are renowned cosmologists, with Guth being perhaps the most famous example. And inquiry into dark matter, an essential cosmological principle, currently relies heavily on particle physicists and the Standard Model. Nonetheless, many particle physicists do not work in cosmology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Reed have a particle collider?

Colleges and universities generally rely on collaborative installations for access to this technology. As an illustration as to why this represents the case, the footprint of the Large Hadron Collider exceeds the area of the entirety of Reed College by over 100 fold.

AI

Most of these responses are AI.

In that AI learned to write from humans, I don’t know how you could draw this conclusion. Worse, because of the definitive tone of your expression, someone may believe you.

It's the awkward and robotic style. It's clearly AI, and I am usually a slow skeptic to these kinds of things.

AI doesn't have an awkward or robotic style. "As an illustration as to why this represents the case" seems like something no AI would ever write because of how awkward it sounds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Reed have a particle collider?

Colleges and universities generally rely on collaborative installations for access to this technology. As an illustration as to why this represents the case, the footprint of the Large Hadron Collider exceeds the area of the entirety of Reed College by over 100 fold.

AI

Most of these responses are AI.

In that AI learned to write from humans, I don’t know how you could draw this conclusion. Worse, because of the definitive tone of your expression, someone may believe you.

It's the awkward and robotic style. It's clearly AI, and I am usually a slow skeptic to these kinds of things.

AI doesn't have an awkward or robotic style. "As an illustration as to why this represents the case" seems like something no AI would ever write because of how awkward it sounds.

Really? Every AI-written thing I’ve seen is incredibly awkward. It’s polished and there are few if any grammatical issues, but it’s robotic and has a very clear style that typically is way too formal for a forum post especially.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Reed have a particle collider?

Colleges and universities generally rely on collaborative installations for access to this technology. As an illustration as to why this represents the case, the footprint of the Large Hadron Collider exceeds the area of the entirety of Reed College by over 100 fold.

AI

Most of these responses are AI.

In that AI learned to write from humans, I don’t know how you could draw this conclusion. Worse, because of the definitive tone of your expression, someone may believe you.

It's the awkward and robotic style. It's clearly AI, and I am usually a slow skeptic to these kinds of things.

AI doesn't have an awkward or robotic style. "As an illustration as to why this represents the case" seems like something no AI would ever write because of how awkward it sounds.

Really? Every AI-written thing I’ve seen is incredibly awkward. It’s polished and there are few if any grammatical issues, but it’s robotic and has a very clear style that typically is way too formal for a forum post especially.

To make this generalization you would need feedback regarding the source of the writing. Otherwise, you have engaged in circular reasoning.