So now you are parsing things? It went from "its much easier to get a 1500 on an SAT than to make a varsity sport" to "its much easier to get a 1500 on the SAT than to get recruited for a D1 sport" When those were proven wrong you are moving to " it's easier to get a 1500 on the SAT than to get accepted into an ivy with a sport" It's quite comical to see the way the argument evolved, lol. Ivy sports aren't that strong except perhaps crew, so it is probably easier to get recruited for an ivy sport than just about any other college sports league. |
This |
| This question is kind of incoherent, but my guess is that at almost every school, there are a lot more kids who are varsity players than get higher than 1500 on the SAT. Iām not sure how many subs get carried on HS soccer or lax teams, but I would assume most schools have about a hundred varsity athletes (combining boys and girls and focusing on team sports like soccer, lacrosse, basketball, baseball, and field hockey) and a lot fewer than that get 1500s. |
|
1. Making a varsity high school team ā easier than a 1500 SAT.
2. Getting a 1500 SAT ā harder than most school athletics achievements. 3. Becoming a D1 athlete ā harder than getting a 1500 SAT. |