Depends 100% on the specific school and the specific sport. Most sports are either no cut, or fairly easy to make at our HS. But we aren't at one of the striver/gunner type schools. |
There is also an ego component and cliquey component for the parents. |
That is so true!! |
It definitely pays off in HS and nearly always helps with admission and scholarships to top universities. |
| In our large public high school in FCPS about 15 kids who've played travel baseball since elementary did not make the JV team as freshmen. An additional 30 or so that played little league/babe ruth (basically rec baseball) didn't make it. And there will be additional cuts from JV to varsity. Plus both JV and Varsity have about 25 kids each, at least half of which sit the bench the entire season. It's pretty brutal and a blow to kids who've been successfully playing on competitive travel teams to not get to play with their high school. It also stinks because, for baseball, travel baseball stops during the high school season, so you don't even have that group to play with til the summer season starts up. |
+1 |
Unfortunately there is so much competition that many kids do fail to make the school team despite years of elementary club sports. Some of this is just genetic. It's not about past effort but about current strength and size. |
| Yes, they always pay off if you do them for the right reasons. |
Are you trying to imply that playing club/travel to prepare for high school team is not the right reason? |
Universities don't value school sports over other activities except in the case of recruited athletes. A girl who played soccer but not well enough to be recruited is in no better position than a girl who did debate, all other factors being equal. That's why people need to be realistic about their kids' abilities and not put all their eggs in the sports basket. |
If parents signed a seven year old for pay to play sports without asking them and has taken it as a requirement for all those years, that the wrong reason. The right reason is when the child loves the game. Whether the kid is athletically gifted and has everything needed to be a top player or a recreational player who loves his easy going games, it doesn’t matter. Thinking it is a big deal on a college application in ten years is not a good reason. It’s not even true. |
+1 IME, the kids who make the high school teams overwhelmingly have done travel. But it’s not because travel prepared them for the high school teams; it’s because the kind of kids who have the athleticism/skill + passion for the game WANT to play as much as they can, i.e. that’s WHY they played travel. |
+1 It really depends on the school, but at large competitive HS programs, it can be challenging. There are only so many spots. Also (IMO) things often change quite a bit during/after puberty- size, speed, athleticism etc. A good reason to encourage multiple activities for as long as possible. |
No. Everyone thinks their kid is going to be a recruited athlete or even professional. Travel is practically a necessity to play in HS, but it’s no guarantee. And people need to consider their sports, look at the number of football scholarships vs baseball. Participate in travel if your kid absolutely loves their sport. Support them as you do in all endeavors. But don’t ever count on your kid being a recruited athlete or pro. |