Be mindful of what you post — Employer could be watching

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Your lack of moral consistency is stunning. Charlie Kirk was despicable and peddled in hate. Most people aren't celebrating his death, they are merely pointing out the sad irony that a despicable person died as a result of the environment he helped create. But even if they are celebrating, that's not a crime, and Charlie Kirk advocated for the right to say despicable things.

So why all the pearl clutching? You can not like it. I didn't like most of what Charlie Kirk had to say. But it wasn't a crime when he did it, and it's not a crime for people to see whatever they want to in his death. You can't mandate people's feelings.

[Anonymous]

America has become full fascist

[Anonymous]

So much for all the "free speech" Republicans and the right wing talk about all the time. Apparently it's just talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Your lack of moral consistency is stunning. Charlie Kirk was despicable and peddled in hate. Most people aren't celebrating his death, they are merely pointing out the sad irony that a despicable person died as a result of the environment he helped create. But even if they are celebrating, that's not a crime, and Charlie Kirk advocated for the right to say despicable things.

So why all the pearl clutching? You can not like it. I didn't like most of what Charlie Kirk had to say. But it wasn't a crime when he did it, and it's not a crime for people to see whatever they want to in his death. You can't mandate people's feelings.

It’s morally wrong. You’ve crossed the line. It’s emblematic of the direction our party is taking.
How we can defend this and say we are honorable people I don’t know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

celebrating Charlie Kirk's death, even in mild ways, is another of those 80/20 issues where Democrats seem to be landing on the wrong side.

Spread hate, get hate. It's really not that hard to understand. And like with Kirk, saying hateful things is not a crime.

Your ilk lowered the standard of discourse to this level and now the chickens are coming home to roost. Maybe empathy and a little "woke" isn't so bad, huh? I certainly wish we could go back to a basic standard of kindness and tolerance toward each other, where hateful words aren't tolerated in polite society.

You clearly are a solid part of 20%. But 80% of Americans would say what happened to Charlie Kirk was despicable, period, full stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:America has become full fascist

Well, our President and his goons definitely are. The rest of us are hoping democracy will return some day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much for all the "free speech" Republicans and the right wing talk about all the time. Apparently it's just talk.

They certainly never wanted "liberty and justice for all."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info.

You can always just cycle your router. In theory the network companies know when you had which ip address, but that would be another step.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk

I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.

But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.

Kirk was a father of young children when he was condoning Biblical punishment of stoning for Gays, wasn't he? Whoever posted about the flags was correct. Nor should Air Force 2 have been Valkyries returning him to Odin!

Trump will do anything to keep Epstein off the front page.

When did Kirk condone stoning of gays? Please cite your source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.

Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info.

You can always just cycle your router. In theory the network companies know when you had which ip address, but that would be another step.

Since I've been on the Jeff's blocked list I power cycled and sure enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk

I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.

But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.

Kirk was a father of young children when he was condoning Biblical punishment of stoning for Gays, wasn't he? Whoever posted about the flags was correct. Nor should Air Force 2 have been Valkyries returning him to Odin!

Trump will do anything to keep Epstein off the front page.

When did Kirk condone stoning of gays? Please cite your source?

Contrary to what you believe ignorance is not bliss. Do your own research as I did.

[Anonymous]

Yes duh. When Trump took office I deactivated my social media.

[Anonymous]

Maybe once they aggregate my data, they will give me a generous promotion, or at the least- restart my telework agreement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Your lack of moral consistency is stunning. Charlie Kirk was despicable and peddled in hate. Most people aren't celebrating his death, they are merely pointing out the sad irony that a despicable person died as a result of the environment he helped create. But even if they are celebrating, that's not a crime, and Charlie Kirk advocated for the right to say despicable things.

So why all the pearl clutching? You can not like it. I didn't like most of what Charlie Kirk had to say. But it wasn't a crime when he did it, and it's not a crime for people to see whatever they want to in his death. You can't mandate people's feelings.

It’s morally wrong. You’ve crossed the line. It’s emblematic of the direction our party is taking.
How we can defend this and say we are honorable people I don’t know?

No one is saying it's honorable. But it's speech. Speech you don't like, but speech nonetheless. Charlie Kirk advocated for the right say despicable things. Why go against the man's own wishes?

Our President says despicable things, you clap like seals. Pete Hegseth says despicable things, you clap like seals. All manner of GOP leaders say despicable things, you clap like seals.

A conservative mouthpiece who said school shootings are the price we pay for freedom gets shot in a school shooting. People celebrate one less nazi in the world, and you clutch your pearls and talk of honor.

You're as disgusting as the people you deign to criticize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk

I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.

But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.

Kirk was a father of young children when he was condoning Biblical punishment of stoning for Gays, wasn't he? Whoever posted about the flags was correct. Nor should Air Force 2 have been Valkyries returning him to Odin!

Trump will do anything to keep Epstein off the front page.

When did Kirk condone stoning of gays? Please cite your source?

He didn’t. Even Stephen King realized he had been misled into believing the propaganda.