George Washington U vs American

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).
Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.
You sound like an army of one with a house in the 'burbs (but a DC zip code) roaring that you live in THE CITY


I’m in Alexandria, a suburb of Washington DC. My friends and colleagues who live in DC proper would never refer to their neighborhoods as suburbs.


Right. They pretend to live in the city. But they don’t.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In the past GW has had the reputation of being for wealthy kids and having a large Jewish and international student population. It is also recognized as a feeder school for Capitol Hill. Our DC area private sends GW one or two students a year.

Our school sends kids to AU, but less reliably. I think an NYC private school kid would feel comfortable at either.

I get the impression that the schools are quite different. That being said, I think there is a fair amount of overlap because of the size of the student body, location and acceptance rate.

GW buildings are mixed into the city (Foggy Bottom) whereas AU has a more traditional campus.

A major benefit of coming to DC is the nice weather (relative to the other areas you are looking at)!

You should definitely come for a visit!


The nice weather compared to Philly?!


I’m PP. I guess you failed reading comprehension. They are from NY and are also looking at colleges up to Moston Boston. But here’s a cookie for posting some snark.


No, you did. The OP has all but ruled out the Boston schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We are in NY so are not as familiar with DC schools. Would like to explore these options for kid #2 (rising junior) who doesn't want to "be too far away" from a city (I don't think being in the center of the city is a requirement. just not too far). Attends a selective (very rigorous) NYC public school, won't have stats for a T30 but a good student overall. Naviance indicates these both could be options.
In a nutshell, what kind of kid goes to GWU vs American?


Both schools are really great for international relations and political science. Can't go wrong with either if that's the interest. But I think GW is better as a more comprehensive university. And I think AU is dealing with the repercussions of some bad leadership in recent years. GW is in much better shape going forward. Regarding campuses, I wouldn't say AU is suburban. It's a nice area, but it's outside of the core of DC. Whereas GW is right there in the heart of things. Overall, I think the caliber of students is going to be stronger at GW. But both schools have a strong tristate vibe and a big international student presence. The thing about GW s that their graduate and professional programs are quite strong. There's the Med school. There's the Elliot School. There's the law school. All very solid, particularly the med school and the Elliot school. It's just a more serious university than AU.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In the past GW has had the reputation of being for wealthy kids and having a large Jewish and international student population. It is also recognized as a feeder school for Capitol Hill. Our DC area private sends GW one or two students a year.

Our school sends kids to AU, but less reliably. I think an NYC private school kid would feel comfortable at either.

I get the impression that the schools are quite different. That being said, I think there is a fair amount of overlap because of the size of the student body, location and acceptance rate.

GW buildings are mixed into the city (Foggy Bottom) whereas AU has a more traditional campus.

A major benefit of coming to DC is the nice weather (relative to the other areas you are looking at)!

You should definitely come for a visit!


The nice weather compared to Philly?!


I’m PP. I guess you failed reading comprehension. They are from NY and are also looking at colleges up to Moston Boston. But here’s a cookie for posting some snark.


No, you did. The OP has all but ruled out the Boston schools.


So desperate to defend your unhelpful snarky response. Here is a direct quote:

“ Was just trying to get an overview of the differences between these schools. Personally I would prefer my younger kid stay within Amtrak/driving distance so I am pushing Boston/Philly/DC options...”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In the past GW has had the reputation of being for wealthy kids and having a large Jewish and international student population. It is also recognized as a feeder school for Capitol Hill. Our DC area private sends GW one or two students a year.

Our school sends kids to AU, but less reliably. I think an NYC private school kid would feel comfortable at either.

I get the impression that the schools are quite different. That being said, I think there is a fair amount of overlap because of the size of the student body, location and acceptance rate.

GW buildings are mixed into the city (Foggy Bottom) whereas AU has a more traditional campus.

A major benefit of coming to DC is the nice weather (relative to the other areas you are looking at)!

You should definitely come for a visit!


The nice weather compared to Philly?!


I’m PP. I guess you failed reading comprehension. They are from NY and are also looking at colleges up to Moston Boston. But here’s a cookie for posting some snark.


No, you did. The OP has all but ruled out the Boston schools.


So desperate to defend your unhelpful snarky response. Here is a direct quote:

“ Was just trying to get an overview of the differences between these schools. Personally I would prefer my younger kid stay within Amtrak/driving distance so I am pushing Boston/Philly/DC options...”


Oh, please, the kid is looking at schools in the northeast corridor. The weather is not that much different in any of those cities. We’re not talking about Boston or Florida.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.



Foggy Bottom is off to the side of the core of DC. I have lived in the DC area and I worked near the Capitol and commuted by Metro for 8 years. If you are at Foggy Bottom, you will be staying in that area unless you are commuting to a job on the Hill. People generally spend a lot of time in the vicinity of their dorms and classrooms, and I personally don't think the Foggy Bottom area is very attractive and it sometimes feels a bit unsafe (as urban areas are prone to feeling). When we toured the campus on a quiet December day with my older kid (then junior), there were homeless people out wandering and yelling. The campus has improved a lot from the 1990s, but it's not lovely.

Half the size means nothing when you are talking thousands of people. You can only meet and hang out with so many, and both schools have tens of thousands. Neither of these schools are tiny SLACs. What really matters is the size of your cohort in your major. Many of Pitt's humanities majors are a nice size to get personal attention without having too small of a faculty base to be effective.

Perhaps the top students at Pitt/Honors College students were a bit more diverse than the general student body...but that was the crowd that I hung out with. When I was in school, the undergrad student body president was from South Africa. Pitt's webpage says that in 2023-24, 3,200 international students from 112 countries were at Pitt. And there's currently about 500 undergrads from NY and NJ - certainly enough to give the sense that there are NY metro people there. (The NJ people I knew were mostly either from NY suburbs or near Philly.)

PP, you seem really bothered by drawing an equivalency between these two universities...is it just that GW's student body is "wealthier"? That would follow, because the tuition costs are higher. Also international students tend to be full pay.

Not as different as you think.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.



Foggy Bottom is off to the side of the core of DC. I have lived in the DC area and I worked near the Capitol and commuted by Metro for 8 years. If you are at Foggy Bottom, you will be staying in that area unless you are commuting to a job on the Hill.


DP but no, this part is completely wrong. Walk three or four blocks in any direction from the edge of campus and you are at the White House, middle of downtown, the Mall, Dupont, Georgetown, etc. If anything, the Hill is off to the side of the core of DC, and Pitt is more like a school on the other side of that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.



Foggy Bottom is off to the side of the core of DC. I have lived in the DC area and I worked near the Capitol and commuted by Metro for 8 years. If you are at Foggy Bottom, you will be staying in that area unless you are commuting to a job on the Hill.


DP but no, this part is completely wrong. Walk three or four blocks in any direction from the edge of campus and you are at the White House, middle of downtown, the Mall, Dupont, Georgetown, etc. If anything, the Hill is off to the side of the core of DC, and Pitt is more like a school on the other side of that.


I said that GW is outside the core but well connected by transit. By which I mean, it's not right at the convenient neighborhoods near the big Metro interchanges - Metro Center, Gallery Place, L'Enfant Plaza. Foggy Bottom-GWU is at least a mile to the White House. This is really just a GW concern, not a comparison with Pitt. My experience is that people use the neighborhood right by their dorms. I'd rather be in NYU's neighborhood than Foggy Bottom, for example. Of course you can get anywhere with Ubers and so forth. But what is right at Foggy Bottom is pretty charmless and office park like.

I would probably prefer to live at AU's campus but it's farther from Metro (needs that shuttle bus) and DCUM people complain that there are a lot of vagrants/loiterers at Tenleytown these days (I don't live in DC now, so can't verify this). OP asked about GW vs. American...so I think it's relevant to share opinions on the feel of the neighborhoods. I think both have some imperfections. Georgetown also...since not a quick walk to Metro.
Anonymous
Well, OP, as you can see from this thread, this is what people are like in the DC area. Your kid may want to factor this into their college search! 😆
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.



Foggy Bottom is off to the side of the core of DC. I have lived in the DC area and I worked near the Capitol and commuted by Metro for 8 years. If you are at Foggy Bottom, you will be staying in that area unless you are commuting to a job on the Hill.


DP but no, this part is completely wrong. Walk three or four blocks in any direction from the edge of campus and you are at the White House, middle of downtown, the Mall, Dupont, Georgetown, etc. If anything, the Hill is off to the side of the core of DC, and Pitt is more like a school on the other side of that.


I said that GW is outside the core but well connected by transit. By which I mean, it's not right at the convenient neighborhoods near the big Metro interchanges - Metro Center, Gallery Place, L'Enfant Plaza. Foggy Bottom-GWU is at least a mile to the White House. This is really just a GW concern, not a comparison with Pitt. My experience is that people use the neighborhood right by their dorms. I'd rather be in NYU's neighborhood than Foggy Bottom, for example. Of course you can get anywhere with Ubers and so forth. But what is right at Foggy Bottom is pretty charmless and office park like.

I would probably prefer to live at AU's campus but it's farther from Metro (needs that shuttle bus) and DCUM people complain that there are a lot of vagrants/loiterers at Tenleytown these days (I don't live in DC now, so can't verify this). OP asked about GW vs. American...so I think it's relevant to share opinions on the feel of the neighborhoods. I think both have some imperfections. Georgetown also...since not a quick walk to Metro.


But it’s not outside the core. The eastern part of GWU’s campus is less than a 10 minute walk to the White House. Three blocks and you are at the EEOB. If you walk in any direction from the campus you are at something major. Downtown and Dupont to its north and northeast, White House to the east, State Department/Fed/monuments/Mall to its south, Kennedy Center/Georgetown to its west. You can do all of those on foot in less than 15 minutes. It’s just a weird take.

Now, whether you like that or the vibe of Foggy Bottom is a different question. It would not be my cup of tea for undergrad. But a kid from New York might find it more appealing than American’s location.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.

I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.

I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.

I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.

Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.

I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.


How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.


Why don't you tell me why they are not? The main difference is the DC location and DC job market. If your goal does not involve living in DC after graduation, and does not involve one of the fields (such as international relations) where it makes sense to go to school in a capital city, these are very similar schools. I've lived in both Pittsburgh and suburban Maryland. I've known multiple people who have cross-shopped these schools. My maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister to GW. My cousin's child looked at Pitt but decided on GW. And I've known people from outside DC who have come to take a look at DC schools and often decided against. Because DC isn't particularly relevant to their life plans. It happens. We lived there and left. It still is a fun place to visit with many smart people.

There. You may take your break now.


What the hell are you talking about? I’m talking about the universities. Not the city of Pittsburgh versus Washington DC. AI has it right:

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) and George Washington University (GW) are both highly regarded universities, but they differ in several key aspects. Pitt is a large, public university with a strong focus on research, particularly in health sciences and engineering, while GW is a private university known for its location in Washington, D.C., and its strengths in political science, international affairs, and business.

You may disagree with AI on this, but it’s a lot more persuasive than “my maid of honor went to Pitt and her sister went to GW.”



I do disagree with AI. AI oversimplifies and stresses the obvious.

Pitt was at one point private, and is not a full state university (it is considered state related, and still has qualities similar to a private university if you would like to define what those are beyond funding). The schools have many of the same majors in the areas I am familiar with. Both are urban, but not located right in the core of the center city. Nonetheless, both are well connected by transport to the local cultural attractions. Pitt is a university with deep emphasis on liberal arts classes beyond STEM (despite what AI says). Liberal arts college undergrads dramatically outweigh the number of engineering students (10K vs 2K-ish), ensuring a focus on all of the liberal arts. Pitt is also strong in humanities, social sciences, and business, and has a graduate school of international affairs that has produced some notable graduates. It is not in DC, but not everyone's political goals involve DC, which is why I think DC interest is a sufficient and distinguishing reason to select GW, but Pitt might be of interest to others. Pitt is likely to be less expensive. There are also buses at breaks to the NY metro area. Pitt attracts students from the NY metro who want to leave their home area for college, as many do.

My point was that they are similar enough for a New York family with the stated criteria to consider. I know people who have cross-shopped these schools because they fill similar niches for students. Also know MoCo students who went to Pitt because they didn't want to stay home for college, which would have likely meant GW/AU/UMD.

Your disbelief does not negate my experiences. Perhaps you aren't as familiar with Pitt as I am with GW.


You’re wrong about GWU’s location. GWU could not be more centrally located in DC. You can practically spit on the White House and National Mall from its campus. It’s half the size of Pitt, it’s private, and it attracts a much wealthier and more geographically diverse student body than Pitt.

67% of Pittsburgh students are from Pennsylvania. Only 5% are from New York. Almost 15% of GW students are from New York, and only 5 percent are actually from Maryland. In other words, you are both wrong in suggesting that lots of New York students choose Pitt, just as you were wrong and suggesting that GW attracts many Maryland students who stay home. It doesn’t and never has.

The bottom line is that there is virtually no overlap between GW students and Pitt students, and none of the schools that OP has identified as schools of interest remotely suggests that Pitt is a fit.



Foggy Bottom is off to the side of the core of DC. I have lived in the DC area and I worked near the Capitol and commuted by Metro for 8 years. If you are at Foggy Bottom, you will be staying in that area unless you are commuting to a job on the Hill. People generally spend a lot of time in the vicinity of their dorms and classrooms, and I personally don't think the Foggy Bottom area is very attractive and it sometimes feels a bit unsafe (as urban areas are prone to feeling). When we toured the campus on a quiet December day with my older kid (then junior), there were homeless people out wandering and yelling. The campus has improved a lot from the 1990s, but it's not lovely.

Half the size means nothing when you are talking thousands of people. You can only meet and hang out with so many, and both schools have tens of thousands. Neither of these schools are tiny SLACs. What really matters is the size of your cohort in your major. Many of Pitt's humanities majors are a nice size to get personal attention without having too small of a faculty base to be effective.

Perhaps the top students at Pitt/Honors College students were a bit more diverse than the general student body...but that was the crowd that I hung out with. When I was in school, the undergrad student body president was from South Africa. Pitt's webpage says that in 2023-24, 3,200 international students from 112 countries were at Pitt. And there's currently about 500 undergrads from NY and NJ - certainly enough to give the sense that there are NY metro people there. (The NJ people I knew were mostly either from NY suburbs or near Philly.)

PP, you seem really bothered by drawing an equivalency between these two universities...is it just that GW's student body is "wealthier"? That would follow, because the tuition costs are higher. Also international students tend to be full pay.

Not as different as you think.


You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. - Lifelong DC resident.
Anonymous
American is in better financial shape.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: