I guess I don’t think of the DE beaches as being particularly elite areas because you don’t see 10,000 square foot homes on 3 acres like will happen on the Hamptons and sell for $100MM. That said, I agree with you…I don’t hear anyone talking about elite VA horse country except Middleburg and don’t hear anyone mentioning elite Eastern shore areas. It’s more like I bought on the Eastern shore because I could get a bigger house and land on the water for the same price of a Bethany beach house. |
Because it’s a great little town that I don’t want you to know about. But others know it. Believe me. |
NP here. That's because you don't know enough people, and that's ok. If you don't know elite ESMD areas then you're just not in the know. And plenty of people have zero interest in the Hamptons or a 10,000 square foot house (anywhere). Or Bethany. |
I’m in the Delaware Beach Fan Club! Why are we talking about whether a second home location is “high end” or not? A destination can be very desirable regardless of whether it’s a hotspot for socialites or celebrities. We and several of our friends have vacation homes in Bethany+other locations, can afford whatever vacations we want, and like to go to Bethany frequently because it’s a pretty and relaxing place to be and relatively easy to get to. I personally wouldn’t do the drive there for a one-night stay, but plenty of our friends do. I think OP’s question is a bit of a silly one to crowdsource, because tolerance for driving time is a very personal thing, as are the things any family values in a vacation spot. I’d gladly drive 3 hours to be near the ocean vs. 2 hours, 1 hour, or a half hour to be at a home on a river, for example. |
| Two hours is better than three hours by a magnitude of more than 50%. |
Nailed it. Nothing captures the provincialism (ironically) of DC like the contingent who drive right past Talbot County and think they’re going to the Hamptons when they’re headed to Rehobeth. “We’re just like the UES because we live in Palisades and go “summer” in Rehobeth”. Yeah ok. |
I grew up going to a ski house that was just over 3 hours away. It was a slog, especially on the way home on Sunday after skiing. |
Depends on the skiing. Vail? Breck? Even the good ones in New England? Probably worth it. Wisp? Hard pass. |
| I think anything under 3 hours would be best. We have never had a second home because we like to frequently travel to new destinations and I don't want to deal with maintaining a second home. I don't mind the driving when we go somewhere local for a weekend. The part I don't like is packing up a million things to bring and then hauling it all back home. Having your own place would take that hassle out of the equation so a 3 hour drive to arrive in your own house, with toiletries, some food in the pantry, clothes in the closet, your own clean bedding etc, wouldn't be a big deal. |
+1 I’m a PP with a 3-hour drive and all we pack is food that might spoil before we get back. |
Um, it's RehobOth. And you misspelled it twice. Which means it wasn't a typo -- you just don't know what you're talking about. |
|
IMO, two hours or less would be fantastic. Three is starting to push it.
I'm not in the DMV, Richmond area. The drive to the North End of VA Beach or even to Sandbridge is about 2 and ideal. OBX is more like 3 plus hours in order to get back up to Corolla. If the new northern bridge would ever get built, that might make OBX more desirable. DC area relative of mine had a place in The Plains. They would head out there every weekend. |
Interesting. People don’t seem to have trouble spelling Siasconset. |
Because two lower end homes instead of one high end property with all your desired amenities also avoids all the financial and management costs associated with keeping a second house, and many people consider hours driving to and from a second home to be unproductive. Time in a really nice primary property is not wasted, time on the road going back and forth is. Not to mention the opportunity costs - with one home and the money you save by not paying for insurance and maintenance and taxes on a second one, you can vacation wherever you like whenever you want, without feeling that you should be using that same old second home because you're paying to keep it. But, if paying and commuting to a second home floats your boat, more power to you. |
I know I shouldn't waste my time debating this silly issue with you. But what the hell, I will . . . First, it all depends on one's definition of "expensive" versus "lower end," which is entirely location specific. Our city house is worth $2 million and our country $1 million -- but our country house is "high end" regardless of where you might find it and is definitely "expensive" for the local area. Our city house is hardly "lower end," but those who know DC wouldn't consider it "expensive" either. It's a comfortable place in a superb location. Which brings me to your definition of "all the nice amenities." Clearly it's different than mine. To me, the "nice amenities" of a house is more than things like a big kitchen with high end appliances -- it's WHERE the house is located and the "amenities" that surround it. From that standpoint, it's impossible to buy a single house with "all the nice amenities" when you want amenities that both the country and the city offer. We didn't buy a second home to spend our time just sitting in it . . . Yes, every time anyone is on the road you are "wasting time." That's precisely why we limited our search for a second home to less than two hours away. Also, we don't work so we don't spend a lot of time driving anywhere else. Finally, what you call "opportunity costs." Again, yes -- if you're not living below your means this is something you need to worry about. But that isn't us. Having to pay for "insurance and maintenance and taxes" on two places isn't a burden, and we can do that and still afford to -- and do -- travel extensively to other places regardless because we're not overextended. We're not even close to house poor. |