Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Will avoid DCA and now it looks like people should avoid SFO as well. The San Carlos tower near SFO now has 0 air traffic controllers due to resignations over low pay.
Only the RJ's can land on 33. Just avoid the RJ's, which I do anyway.
They are more claustrophobic, fly at lower speeds and have minimal bin space.
I already said “if it’s my only option I’ll take it.” But thankfully it rarely is and I’ve never needed to fly to Wichita. And despite uncountable trips in/out of DCA, I don’t think I’ve ever landed on 33.
I feel like Luke Skywalker at the end of The Last Jedi: "everything you just said is wrong"
SOME RJs are more claustrophobic than mainline narrowbody jets- some are not. The Embraer 170/175/190/195 is perfectly comfortable to me personally, and has bins big enough to fit a regular carryon size suitcase. And those can land on 33 at DCA.
Normal cruise speeds:
A320- mach 0.78
737-700- mach 0.781
E175- mach 0.75
E190- mach 0.78
CRJ700- mach 0.78
CRJ200- mach 0.72