2025 Special Elections Thread

Anonymous
Looking good for the Dem in Wisconsin. You can follow the vote count as it comes in and is updated continuously here.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/01/us/elections/results-wisconsin-supreme-court.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.

Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?

Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.

She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.


Really? I know nothing about Wisconsin so following closely but blindly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt Dems can win either of the house seats. These were both Trump +30 districts. That would be a massive swing. But if the Rs only win by 10 or 15, every R in an even moderately close district should start getting very worried.


Nope.

There will be no elections after 2025.


Stop with this. States run elections. The White House does not. The US Congress does not.

Will there be contests with highly suspicious results in some places? Probably.

Well said, thank you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.

Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?

Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.

She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.


🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.

Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?

Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.

She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.


🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.

It is. Dave Wasserman called it at least 10 minutes ago.
Anonymous
75% of presidential turnout. Crazy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.

Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?

Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.

She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.


🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.

It is. Dave Wasserman called it at least 10 minutes ago.

Wait, Dave’s seen enough?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Crawford ahead, 58% - 42%, with 36% in.

Do the outstanding precincts favor Crawford or Schimel?

Not PP but Crawford is overperforming Harris everywhere which signals a comfortable win.

She is leading in R stronghold counties. It is shocking. Dump shouldn’t have betrayed the farmers. Parts of rural Wisconsin came through. The big Milwaukee count isn’t even completely in.


🤞 Hoping for a total Musk/Trump b***h slap.

It is. Dave Wasserman called it at least 10 minutes ago.

Wait, Dave’s seen enough?


Who’s Dave Wasserman? Only 50% of vote is in.
Anonymous
NBC called it for the Democrat, Crawford, in WI! Suck it, Musk.
Anonymous
The great thing about this result is the further unlocking of the Koch Lock that allowed the extreme gerrymandering in the state. The state level borders have been redrawn more evenly and now the federal congressional districts can be redrawn, likely taking two R seats to be more competitive.
Anonymous
If the Democrat wins it will be a tiny ray of light after today’s gory day at HHS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NBC called it for the Democrat, Crawford, in WI! Suck it, Musk.

Don’t mess with Sconnie!
Anonymous
CNN still dragging it out for clicks.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NBC called it for the Democrat, Crawford, in WI! Suck it, Musk.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Looking good for the Dem in Wisconsin. You can follow the vote count as it comes in and is updated continuously here.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/01/us/elections/results-wisconsin-supreme-court.html


If the Dems do win, I'll be shocked and delighted.

Musk spent so much money and bribed so many people to vote for the republican state supreme court justice.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: