Pam Bondi - new nom for AG

[Anonymous]

Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

Wrong. You may not want a conservative AG, but she's more than qualified.

[Anonymous]

The other thing besides sexual misconduct allegations that’s bringing so many of Trump’s nominees together: bad stories about dogs.
https://www.businessinsider.com/rnc-speaker-pam-bondi-custody-battle-dog-with-katrina-victims-2020-8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y’all going to wish it was still Gaetz.

Nah. Florida politics don't work in DC.

Get ready for it to try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

So who would you like Trump to appoint?

[Anonymous]

I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.

[Anonymous]

She was also part of the Guiliani Road Show about election fraud in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.

No, that’s just a list of cheap attacks at Pam Bondi. Can you give the name of one Republican you would support or at least tolerate for AG? If not, that puts your attacks on Bondi in context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She dropped the Trump University fraud case after he made a big donation to her campaign.

She’s qualified but corrupt.

Most of Trump’s picks are either corrupt, been charged with a crime or accused of sexual assault. Some all of the above. I get sometimes you find out later that the person isn’t an ethical law abiding person but these people are well known to have ethics problems at the very least.. The bar has been set so low and it’s really sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She was also part of the Guiliani Road Show about election fraud in 2020.

Trump wouldn’t choose a person who didn’t lie and claim fraud on his behalf even if they were absolutely perfect for the country. With Trump it’s not about the country and if anyone thinks that Trump is choosing candidates based on what’s best for the country they have the mentality of a five year old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

So who would you like Trump to appoint?

Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

So who would you like Trump to appoint?

Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.

+1000.

But instead we have charlatans and grifters and unethical characters like Gaetz, Bondi, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

So who would you like Trump to appoint?

Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.

like Merrick Garland?