Former Trump Chief of Staff Kelly Warns Trump would Rule as a dictator

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laurene Powell-Jobs, best friend and huge donor to Kamala Harris, owner of The Atlantic...

Jeffrey Goldberg, Atlantic editor-in-chief, writes anonymously sourced piece trashing Kamala Harris opponent, Donald Trump...

Nothing to see here, folks!


And the newspaper that’s the bastion of the liberal media, the New York Times.


The NY Times has been treating Trump, like most print, web and video media, with kid gloves. Compare how it treated Biden's "mental decline" with Trump's. It isn't close. There is no such thing as "liberal media" Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity spent 40 years maligning journalism with half truths and innuendo to brainwash its listener and viewership. Almost all media is corporate owned and thus driven by the dollar, clicks and ad revenue. Trump has been and is a gold mine for them.


Those that hate him seem to generate the most clicks. Any negative article about him is pounced on by his detractors and posted multiple times,on this board.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shame on John Kelly. He is a very dishonorable man for try8nf to bring his former boss down because of his personal vendetta.


What is the personal vendetta?

Maybe he believes in country over party and doesn't want to be responsible for the rise of an American fascist state?


He believe in protecting the establishment. None of these losers are putting party over country. They are all establishment goons.


the establishment? do you hear yourself?


Trump’s biggest mistake, as he recently said, was to hire bad and incompetent people like John Kelly. He didn’t know anyone in Washington and got bad advice in his personnel decisions.

Regardless, i don’t care what these swamp creature disgruntled former employees have to say. The Biden-Harris presidency has been so bad, I would literally vote for anyone over either of them.


Listen to you bash a conservative, decorated general who served in the military for decades and offered up his son to this country. Have to no shame?

Maybe ask yourself why someone of his background would be disgruntled after working for Trump.

Maybe ask yourself why Trump, if he is such a smart guy, made such bad hires (according to him and you.). So many of them. Not a great track record of you go by Trump’s own assessment of his hires. Clearly he has bad judgment, by his own admittance.


Just because Kelly was a good military general doesn’t mean he was a good White House Chief of Staff. His tenure with Trump obviously didn’t work out, but shame on him for slandering his former boss. He never once claimed Trump said he wanted to be a dictator or Trump said he admired fascism as a political ideology. That was simply his opinion. I don’t know why that should be viewed as the gospel truth, given that he’s a disgruntled former employee.


What made him disgruntled?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


Why does Trump hire so many malcontents? Bad judgment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s about greed. Kelly and Cheney and other war mongers are getting rich under Kamala and Biden and they want the status quo to remain. More war!! More money for them!!


Yup. The establishment military industrial complex is scared that their gravy train will dry up if Trump wins and ends the pointless overseas wars that we are funding.


Trump is itching to drop a bomb somewhere. It will give him a thrill.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


3 out of 44 is not "many"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shame on John Kelly. He is a very dishonorable man for try8nf to bring his former boss down because of his personal vendetta.


What is the personal vendetta?

Maybe he believes in country over party and doesn't want to be responsible for the rise of an American fascist state?


He believe in protecting the establishment. None of these losers are putting party over country. They are all establishment goons.


the establishment? do you hear yourself?


Trump’s biggest mistake, as he recently said, was to hire bad and incompetent people like John Kelly. He didn’t know anyone in Washington and got bad advice in his personnel decisions.

Regardless, i don’t care what these swamp creature disgruntled former employees have to say. The Biden-Harris presidency has been so bad, I would literally vote for anyone over either of them.


Listen to you bash a conservative, decorated general who served in the military for decades and offered up his son to this country. Have to no shame?

Maybe ask yourself why someone of his background would be disgruntled after working for Trump.

Maybe ask yourself why Trump, if he is such a smart guy, made such bad hires (according to him and you.). So many of them. Not a great track record of you go by Trump’s own assessment of his hires. Clearly he has bad judgment, by his own admittance.


Just because Kelly was a good military general doesn’t mean he was a good White House Chief of Staff. His tenure with Trump obviously didn’t work out, but shame on him for slandering his former boss. He never once claimed Trump said he wanted to be a dictator or Trump said he admired fascism as a political ideology. That was simply his opinion. I don’t know why that should be viewed as the gospel truth, given that he’s a disgruntled former employee.


Then why did Trump hire him to work for the White House for two years? If he wasn't a good Chief if Staff why did he serve in the role so long? What's wrong with Trump as a boss that so many people who worked in his White House are "disgruntled" and lashing out by refusing to ensure or even going on record against him?

He sounds like a bad executive with poor instincts about people and an inability to manage and delegate effectively.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


Sure, Jan.
Anonymous
Yes it’s alarming OP but there is no trying to use logic with Trump supporters. Any criticism or concern is met with it’s the Deep State/establishment blah, blah, blah. Doesn’t matter how many people are sounding the alarms.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


3 out of 44 is not "many"


No, half of his cabinet has endorsed him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/trump-cabinet-endorsements/

Why not trust the word of those who worked with him who have endorsed him?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


3 out of 44 is not "many"


No, half of his cabinet has endorsed him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/trump-cabinet-endorsements/

Why not trust the word of those who worked with him who have endorsed him?


because the ones who endorsed him were among the worse government officials in the history of the country
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How? Legally how?


If the military does what he says, a piece of paper isn't going to stop him.
Oh grow up. The US Military will not be used against civilians. Go learn something.


I know what you’re trying to say PP, but we shouldn’t shy away from using the military against the wrong Americans. President Trump figured out late in his term how to do this. You send the Democrat soldiers overseas where they have to fight for their lives, and keep the loyal ones here to serve as President Trump’s de facto secret police, his strike force, his shock troops.

Border Patrol. Bureau of Prisons. ICE. Space Force. These are the most loyal ranks to President Trump. This is where you form the muscle for President Trump. You give them the best arms, the best food and the hottest women from all over the globe. Then you turn them loose on Portland and other blue hellholes across the country.

Oh, but, but, but that’s against the soldiers’ oath to uphold the Constitution? Soldiers will refuse to follow orders?

Please. Soldiers want to survive. You make a violent example of some generals who think they will resist. You send the Dem forces to combat zones around the globe, and empower loyalist hit squads to take out any soldier who tries to push back. Eventually soldiers will see that if they want a cushy life, they better get on board. They play ball, and they can have the time of their lives here in America. Or they can be cannon fodder in Poland as they starve in trenches with broken guns and scarce ammo.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


3 out of 44 is not "many"


No, half of his cabinet has endorsed him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/trump-cabinet-endorsements/

Why not trust the word of those who worked with him who have endorsed him?


Only half??! Yikes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine looking at the long list of people who worked in Trump's administration and believing, "nope, they are liars. Trump, Don Jr, Rudy Giuliani, MGT and Laura Loomer are the ones I believe!"


Actually, there are many people from his cabinet that have endorsed his re-election bid. Yet, we are supposed to take the world of the malcontents who failed at their jobs.


3 out of 44 is not "many"


No, half of his cabinet has endorsed him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2024/trump-cabinet-endorsements/

Why not trust the word of those who worked with him who have endorsed him?


because the ones who endorsed him were among the worse government officials in the history of the country


That’s your opinion. I think many of those officials did a good job. Posters on this board are pushing a false narrative that everyone who worked for him has a poor opinion of him and is against his re-election.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How? Legally how?


If the military does what he says, a piece of paper isn't going to stop him.
Oh grow up. The US Military will not be used against civilians. Go learn something.


I know what you’re trying to say PP, but we shouldn’t shy away from using the military against the wrong Americans. President Trump figured out late in his term how to do this. You send the Democrat soldiers overseas where they have to fight for their lives, and keep the loyal ones here to serve as President Trump’s de facto secret police, his strike force, his shock troops.

Border Patrol. Bureau of Prisons. ICE. Space Force. These are the most loyal ranks to President Trump. This is where you form the muscle for President Trump. You give them the best arms, the best food and the hottest women from all over the globe. Then you turn them loose on Portland and other blue hellholes across the country.

Oh, but, but, but that’s against the soldiers’ oath to uphold the Constitution? Soldiers will refuse to follow orders?

Please. Soldiers want to survive. You make a violent example of some generals who think they will resist. You send the Dem forces to combat zones around the globe, and empower loyalist hit squads to take out any soldier who tries to push back. Eventually soldiers will see that if they want a cushy life, they better get on board. They play ball, and they can have the time of their lives here in America. Or they can be cannon fodder in Poland as they starve in trenches with broken guns and scarce ammo.


How do you discern "dem forces" from the domestic muscle? Or is it that you segregate the military and send all of the people of color abroad?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: