|
Potassium bromate, bvo, some parabens, red #3 will be banned in 2027. https://www.npr.org/2023/10/10/1204839281/california-ban-food-additives-red-dye-3-propylparaben-candy |
|
California is also restricting other artificial food dyes in school food:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/health/california-food-dye-ban-schools-wellness/index.html Locally, FCPS also bans artificial food dyes from school food and food companies are voluntarily phasing them out of many popular foods. |
PP you replied to. What did they say exactly? Now I'm curious. Is it the artificial preservatives and coloring? The fact it's a little (not a lot) processed, instead of being made from scratch? Would they have been fine with an organic brownie mix? I buy a lot of organic produce, I avoid artificial sweeteners, preservatives and coloring, and try to limit the ultraprocessed chips that I love to eat (ha). But I would NEVER lecture my host on any of it! Très gauche! They're a little extra, OP. Please don't feel bad. |
| What’s rude is lecturing your host in their own home. Doesn’t matter whether it’s about the food or the set up. If someone is gracious enough to host you, be respectful and gracious. If you don’t want to eat something simply say no thank you. It’s really not hard to be polite. |
^ This shows that Americans care about this and companies respond, voluntarily or when regulated. |
Thank you. Yes we do care and we shop with our wallets. Thank goodness for California too. I know everyone makes fun of them but they really are a leader and a catalyst and they get things done. And they have a gdp larger than many countries. |
+1 I've seen some crazy stories about the food, or "food", in other countries. But other than real issues such as tap water in some countries or food allergies, I would be gracious about anything a host served me. Those people were either crazy rude or just crazy. If they are family or very close friends, maybe they were being informal? If so, they just came across as rude. |
| I have European family. Your guests were right about the lack of regulation, but they were also rude. They could have eaten two bites, said yum, and pretended to be full. |
Yes that is good news but still way behind on the world bell curve for banning harmful additives - the bans are still 3 years away and other products banned in the EU that are allowed here will remain. Many of people who use DCIM are highly educated and have good jobs so they will probably shop much more selectively. The US general public has many people who work very hard/ have multiple minimum wage jobs with no health insurance and probably can’t afford to buy organic from Whole Foods/ Moms. Many Americans care for sure, but in my experience no where near to the degree that people in other countries worry about what they are consuming. The answers in this post reflected that - Most PPs expressed outage with the picky rude guests rather than try to understand why they were so alarmed about shelf safe bake products that contain a known carcinogen that can also cause other health problems. I personally would have eaten the brownies with a smile and thanked the kids —/ but I do understand why some guests from other countries might decline. |
| Do they not realize that even homemade brownies contain “shelf-safe” ingredients: sugar, cocoa powder or baker’s chocolate, etc.? |
Yeah those are not the ingredients that would be worrying them - Potassium bromate and several other harmful additives that are banned elsewhere would be the concern. Even China and Indian ban potassium bromate. |
Look at the ingredient list: those aren't in the brownies. |
What is the ingredient that makes it shelf safe in the US? Whether the extra food additives are there, the valid concern of many Europeans visiting the US is that non fresh long life products do contain additives that are banned elsewhere. |
It's the plastic sealed bag |