This post perfectly illustrates what the pp was referring to when they called out the "absolutely obnoxious behavior by supporters." |
It’s outrageous you are hostile for no reason on multiple platforms slamming the MVA when you have zero experience. |
The county isn't offering synchronous online school, either. If it's really cheaper to insource it, then the state could do that. But you don't know what contracted rates the states pay, just what they charge individuals. |
I'm not sure who you think I am or what other "platforms" I'm using. But, look at your previous post again before calling anyone else hostile. |
It’s not the state who provides education, the county does. The state provides over site. What is your obsession with the state providing it? The county woukd have to pay the state if that happened like in VA. Mcps would not get it for free. |
There aren't even enough students in Montgomery County to make MVA scale effectively (e.g., the 10-person classrooms in some grades). How could smaller counties ever do virtual without being grouped with kids from the larger counties? A state-based program makes much more sense for a niche program like virtual learning for kids. |
It could scale effectively. There was a waitlist for the MVA last year. The people who cite the data saying that the program lost more than 67% of its participants overall and lost more than 40% of its participants 2 years in a row are just mean. |
+1 the guy should have started working on behalf of MVA families the day his contract was signed on June 25 even if it was before his contracted start date of July 1. If he really cared, he would have started the outreach then without being paid and without being the actual superintendent. To heck with his contract and actual appointment start dates. To be honest, he should have started working his priorities the day he applied for the job. What a loser. |
Guess where there is not a waitlist? In person where class sizes continue to grow. Guess who would like smaller class sizes and attention? Students and families in person who continue to deal with the consequences of budget constraints. |
Some grades were under-enrolled, while other grades had stronger demand. Pulling from a broader base of students would help to even that out. |
800 students is plenty. MCPS has a number of programs with less thsn that. |
Nots with their own standalone administration, and not for kids with no identified special needs. Running an entire separate administrative and educational apparatus for 800 kids is a terrible use of money. It makes much more sense to scale that up to the state level. |
Majority have special needs |
|
Part of being a public school parent is recognizing that we live in a society, and that you are not always going to be able to maximize your own child's experience. You can try, but at the end of the day the district has to balance the needs of many different groups, and sometimes your child's group isn't going to come out on top.
Because we live in a society, I understand that my child's class might have 26 kids instead of 24 so that MCPS can have a smaller ratio at the highest-needs schools, or in classrooms where kids are dealing with significant learning differences. What I cannot stomach a is my child's class having 26 instead of 24 so that another typically developing kid down the block can have a class of 10 just because they can afford to have a parent home full-time. |
No, not across 12 grades where you'd expect class sizes to be similar to the gen ed population. And certainly not when you're trying to cover high school electives. There were entire grades that only had 30 kids. That doesn't work. I don't know why you continue to fight the obvious solution. The state needs to create a program serving all districts. It's already too late for this coming year for both Montgomery County and the state. You're just wasting your time by not turning your attention to the legislature. |