| I am always amazed at people growing businesses so quickly from scratch. Would love to know what 700k poster does. |
How is it different? My wife wanted three kids and if I said no I want to retire early and goof off let’s just not have the two extra kids. Those two kids disappear It is terminator movie where they try to kill the not yet born John Connor by killing mother pre his birth. |
It wasn't super quick - the business was started in the summer of 2020, taking four years to reach $700k/year. This is my fourth business over the last 8 years, with the first and second being complete failures, generating less than $5k in revenue each. My third business, a software app launched in 2017, did better, hitting a peak revenue of $40k per month. However, it trailed off due to covid, and I eventually gave up on it. It still generates about $15k per month in gross revenue from the most dedicated customers. The business in question (my 4th) is in real estate. We buy cheap land (below $40k), build cabins for short-term rentals with a general contractor (I had zero construction knowledge before this), refinance at 75% loan-to-value, and use the proceeds to start another. It takes 8-12 months to complete construction, and in that time, the previous cabin hopefully generates the needed 25%. If it doesn't, we add more personal money. We gained access to commercial construction loans after a couple of builds and accumulating 2 years of business tax history. This means we no longer need to have 100% of the money upfront, as the bank provides construction-to-permanent loans at 70-75%. So, we only need to buy land + 25% + buffer. This approach allows us to build 2-3 projects instead of just one. No magic involved. |
Thank you for explaining. I consider 4 years very quick! Sounds like an interesting business, though I'm sure very stressful at first. |
You are dumber than rocks. Choosing not to have additional kids is not the same as murder. |
|
You could still move to a foreign country and FIRE without a huge difference in amount. Maybe $3M with $4M to be conservative.
When I was in my 30s I thought about this a lot. Especially moving to the Caribbean. The problem is that we ultimately decided that we wanted our kids to have a different lifestyle than that. I’m not sure that the one we gave them was any better, just different. That said, no regrets. My mentaility is more about working my tail off and creating cash flow, which I ultimately did. I ended up retiring by 45 with more than $30M. For now we are still in the DMV |
+1 |
It is for the grandparents. My cousin only could have one child. Their one child got married and is Fire decided no kids. She killed off whole bloodline |
So what? Adults don’t have to have children they don’t want just so their parents will have grandkids. |
Young Adults are stupid as their minds are not fully formed. I had one friend who was original fire person. Got in IT earlier. Dropped out of college at 20 and retired 42 for food. I was at their wedding. Married a women about his age. He was insistent no kids and wife was on fence. He went back to work full time at 52 an easy job as was bored so did wife but she works part time. At his 60 birthday him and wife got into huge fight how he has a waterfront home, fancy boat, and money and no one to share it with. No kids to go to game, no one to take fishing, no one to leave money to. Why did she let him do this. Was odd was his idea. But reality started to set in at 50 and by 60 he was furious with himself. He is a dope. He has millions and wife a nurse even having two kids would not impacted much. The money not meaningless. He actually has an estate in Turks and Caicos now where he will die alone and his assets split up. |
|
The FIRE movement isn’t a good idea for most people. If you’ve done well professionally you can end up in your 40s in a career where you get paid a lot of money and still have time to enjoy your life outside of work. It’s less stressful for me to work and spend a lot of money enjoying life than it is for me to not work and scrimp and save.
My kids would also have to give up a lot to have unemployed parents. No expensive summer camp, frequent ski vacations, tutors, out of state college, etc. No babysitters so that mom and dad can have a break and focus on their marriage. FIRE also doesn’t recognize how much you’re giving up by not having an income. My salary is $280k roughly. It’s not just that I’d need $280k from investments but I’d also be giving up $280k in earnings. |
|
A lot of the FIRE claims, advocacy, and whatnot is just marketing. Many people claim to follow FIRE and advocate for it just to gain eyeballs for the ads on their social media sites. The real number of successful FIRE people is wildly smaller than the number of people who claim to have done it successfully.
Caveat Emptor. |
| If investments and income can get you to 30million by 35 sure. But definitely only have 1 kid. My sister isn't FIRE but manages to raise her kids on a shoe string while her DH retired (he inherited and they owned their house outright). She is an ED nurse and just picked up extra shifts when an expense popped up. That said, 4 kids, zero extracurriculars, zero enrichment of any kind. Travel was maybe driving to another state. Her kids were funnelled into community college and all live at home. One is now at the local 4 year. I have mixed feelings about what she did but it sounds like what the FIRE lifestyle would be with kids. |
Are they thoroughbred racehorces? |
|
FIRE is countercultural. Have you seen how many people are negative about SAHMs? That's a proxy for the general belief that if you're not working you suck in this country.
If you wanted to do FIRE with kids, you and they would have to come to terms with the fact that extremely expensive hobbies are out. No travel soccer. No private lessons for the viola. Etc. Most people aren't willing to go against the culture on this one. |