Teen gunman who 'sprayed DC neighborhood with 26 rounds from an AR-15' is released on bail by self-confessed woke judge

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Chief Judge Lee F. Satterfield

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

No one could possibly be unhinged enough to commit anither crime while out on bail for another crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

Thank you. So the District played a role. And who was the appointing president?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

Thank you. So the District played a role. And who was the appointing president?

The commission simply makes nominations. The judge in this case is a magistrate judge. Magistrate judges are not appointed by a President but rather the Chief Judge. As another poster has said, the Chief Judge who made the appointment is Lee F. Satterfield. Satterfield himself is a George H.W. Bush nominee (confirmed by the Senate).

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

Thank you. So the District played a role. And who was the appointing president?

The commission simply makes nominations. The judge in this case is a magistrate judge. Magistrate judges are not appointed by a President but rather the Chief Judge. As another poster has said, the Chief Judge who made the appointment is Lee F. Satterfield. Satterfield himself is a George H.W. Bush nominee (confirmed by the Senate).

Recommendation by the JNC to serve as a judge is DC is a requirement of DC law, A judge cannot be nominated by the President unless they have been recommended by the JNC.

3 of the 7 members of the JNC are directly appointed by DC government and 2 more members are appointed by the DC Bar, which has business before the DC government.

Furthermore, DC law also requires all judges to be DC residents.

So the appointment of judges very strongly reflect the preferences of DC government.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

Thank you. So the District played a role. And who was the appointing president?

The commission simply makes nominations. The judge in this case is a magistrate judge. Magistrate judges are not appointed by a President but rather the Chief Judge. As another poster has said, the Chief Judge who made the appointment is Lee F. Satterfield. Satterfield himself is a George H.W. Bush nominee (confirmed by the Senate).

The insinuations you make about Satterfield are gross when the truth is that Satterfield is a Black man from DC who worked at DOJ before being appointed to the bench.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

GPS is a joke, it is only monitored during business hours. It's also easy to tamper with it or remove it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This young man needs to be held accountable for his actions. What can we do to change the way this was handled?

Vote Republican. Duh.

Oh, hell no. Today's Republicans all hate America and everything it stands for. They staged a violent insurrection and tried to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. They're hell bent on stripping away our rights. Screw that. Vote blue, no matter who.

Once again.......YOU voted for this. You want changes and improvement, but keep voting the same way, despite one party clearly wanting to push law and order hard, but that's not good enough for you. Next shootings in DC (sadly will be in the next 24 hrs)...go to the crime scene, and tell everyone you dont want to vote in people that will do a cleanup.

The judge is federally appointed. DC voters didn't vote for him.

Does anyone know who appointed him?

Judges are appointed by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission who members are appointed by:

- President of the United States (1 lawyer member)
- Mayor of the District of Columbia (2 members, one must be a non-lawyer)
- District of Columbia Council (1 non-lawyer member)
- Chief Judge, US District Court for the District of Columbia (federal judge)
- DC Bar (2 lawyer members)

Thank you. So the District played a role. And who was the appointing president?

You know, Google is a thing. All this information is readily available. Why do you expect others to look it up for you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Last I checked, you could be bailed out of jail for crimes. What was the bond?

I don’t understand what being “woke” has to do with following the law.

Are you suggesting he should be held without bail? In what grounds? Why do you hate America and our justice system?

DC effectively doesn't have money bail and hasn't since the early 90s. The options are release with conditions or a hold. He was released with conditions (house arrest with an ankle monitor). Legally, he could be held in DC on the basis of having been charged with a crime of violence, if the judge didn't believe that any combination of pretrial conditions would ensure both that he would appear for trial and community safety.

He is still presumed innocent until proven guilty and he still has constitutional rights despite a lot of “anti-woke” (meaning anti-America) demands. People who whine about wokeness are seriously the worst people who hate this country and its basic tenets.

Just like Trump, right? Lol!

Trump should be held without bond, or he might pay off more pornstars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

GPS is a joke, it is only monitored during business hours. It's also easy to tamper with it or remove it.

Tampering with the ankle monitor is a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

No one could possibly be unhinged enough to commit anither crime while out on bail for another crime.

I assume this is sarcasm. Have you been in DC?? The Neanderthals committing crime do not much brain activity up there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some context- the defendant was released on 24 confinement to a residence with an ankle monitor. He is pending trial, and it sure looks like the evidence at this point leads to conviction and incarceration.

Some context I cannot immediately locate- what percentage of cases involving similar conduct result in this type of pre-trial release?

I'd love the data, but anecdotally it seems fairly common for even murder suspects to be released on bail?

My question is whether this case is substantially different than results in other cases, which would mean we have an anomaly to investigate involving this judge. Alternatively, if this type of result is common, we are investigating the system as a whole.

Indeed, it's sadly common for attempted or successful murderers to be released on bail, and then assault or attempt (and sometimes succeed) murder again.

Witnesses won’t just kill themselves.

That's illegal. It's the called witness tampering.

NP but all the perpetrator will get is a second ankle monitor right? Because spraying bullets at cars is illegal too. When there are no consequences for one violent crime who cares if you commit another?

GPS is a joke, it is only monitored during business hours. It's also easy to tamper with it or remove it.

Tampering with the ankle monitor is a crime.

Are you suggesting he’d go to jail?